Complications following combined transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate needle biopsies and transurethral resection of the prostate

Archives of Andrology

Volumn 52, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 123-127

  Shen, B Y ^a   Chang, P L ^a   Lee, S H ^a   Chen, C L ^a   Tsui, K H ^a  

^a CHANG GUNG UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Benign prostatic hyperplasia; Complications; Infection; Prostate biopsies

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BODY TEMPERATURE; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE SEVERITY; DYSURIA; FEVER; FREQUENCY ANALYSIS; HEMATURIA; HEMOSPERMIA; HOSPITAL ADMISSION; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; LENGTH OF STAY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL RECORD; MICTURITION DISORDER; NEEDLE BIOPSY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE BIOPSY; PROSTATE CANCER; PROSTATE HYPERTROPHY; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTOR; SAFETY; SAMPLE SIZE; SCREENING TEST; SURGEON; TRANSRECTAL ULTRASONOGRAPHY; TRANSURETHRAL RESECTION; URINARY TRACT INFECTION; URINE RETENTION;

AGED; BIOPSY, NEEDLE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSTATE; PROSTATIC HYPERPLASIA; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TRANSURETHRAL RESECTION OF PROSTATE; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, INTERVENTIONAL;

EID: 31844438318     PISSN: 01485016     EISSN: 15210375     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01485010500316014     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Coplen DE, Andriole GL, et al. (1991): The ability of systematic transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy to detect prostate cancer in men with the clinical diagnosis of benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Urol 146:75-77.
2. Crawford ED, Haynes AL Jr, et al. (1982): Prevention of urinary tract infection and sepsis following transrectal prostatic biopsy. J Urol 127:449-451.
3. Cooner WH, Mosley BR, et al. (1988): Clinical application of transrectal ultrasonography and prostate specific antigen in the search of prostate cancer. J Urol 139:758-761.
4. Cooner WH., Mosley BR, et al. (1990): Prostate cancer detection in a clinical urological practice by ultrasonography, digital rectal examination and prostate specific antigen. J Urol 143:1146-1149.
5. Gustafsson O, Norming U, et al. (1990): Complications following combined transrectal aspiration and core biopsy of the prostate. Scand J Urol Nephrol 24:249-251.
6. Hodge KK, McNeal JE, et al. (1989): Random systematic versus directed ultrasound guided transrectal core biopsies of the prostate. J Urol 142:71-74.
7. Hodge KK, McNeal JE, Stamey TA (1989): Ultrasound guided transrectal core biopsies of the palpably abnormal prostate. J Urol 142:66-70.
8. Jones JS, Patel AR, Ulchaker JC (2003): Periprostatic block eliminates pain of transrectal prostate biopsy. Am J Uro Rev 4:160-164.
9. Levine MA, Ittman M, et al. (1998): Two consecutive sets of transrectal ultrasound guided sextant biopsies of the prostate for the detection of prostate cancer. J Urol 159:471-475.
10. Naughton CK, Smith DS, et al. (1998): Clinical and pathologic tumor characteristics of prostate cancer as a function of the number of biopsy cores: a retrospective study. Urology 52:808-813.
11. Tsui KH, Shen BY, et al. (2004): Probability based diagnostic biopsy specimens as predictors of tumor grade and stage found. Arch Androl 50(5):333-337.
12. Thompson PM, Talbot RW, et al. (1980): Transrectal biopsy of the prostate and bacteraemia. Br J Surg 67:127-128.
13. Thompson PM, Pryor JP, et al. (1982): The problem of infection after prostatic biopsy: the case for the transperineal approach. Br J Urol 54:736-740.