Learning approximate preconditions for methods in hierarchical plans

ICML 2005 - Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Machine Learning

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 337-344

  Ilghami, Okhtay ^a   Muñoz Avila, Héctor ^b   Nau, Dana S ^c   Aha, David W ^d  

^a University of Maryland ^*  (United States)

^b Lehigh University   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

^d NAVAL RESEARCH LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HIERARCHICAL SYSTEMS; PLANNING; PROBLEM SOLVING; SET THEORY;

DOMAIN KNOWLEDGE; HIERARCHICAL PLANS; LEARNER GENERATE SOLUTION PLANS; TRAINING SET;

LEARNING SYSTEMS;

EID: 31844435717     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1102351.1102394     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. Erol, K., Hendler, J., & Nau, D. S. (1996). Complexity results for hierarchical task-network planning. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence, 18, 69-93.
2. Garland, A., Ryall, K., & Rich, C. (2001). Learning hierarchical task models by defining and refining examples. Proceedings of the 1st Int'l Conference on Knowledge Capture (pp. 44-51).
3. Hirsh, H., Mishra, N., & Pitt, L. (1997). Version spaces without boundary sets. Proceedings of the 14th Nat'l Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 491-496).
4. Hirsh, H., Mishra, N., & Pitt, L. (2004). Version spaces and the consistency problem. Artificial Intelligence, 156, 115-138.
5. Huang, Y.-C., Selman, B., & Kautz, H. A. (2000). Learning declarative control rules for constraint-based planning. Proceedings of the 17th Int'l Conference on Machine Learning (pp. 415-422).
6. Ilghami, O., Nau, D., Muñoz-Avila, H., & Aha, D. (2002). CaMeL: Learning method preconditions for HTN planning. Proceedings of the 6th Int'l Conference on AI Planning and Scheduling (pp. 168-178).
7. Khardon, R. (1999). Learning action strategies for planning domains. Artificial Intelligence, 113, 125-148.
8. Langley, P., & Rogers, S. (2004). Cumulative learning of hierarchical skills. Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Development and Learning.
9. Martin, M., & Geffner, H. (2000). Learning generalized policies in planning using concept languages. Proceedings of the 7th Int'l Conference on Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (pp. 667-677).
10. Mitchell, T. M. (1977). Version spaces: A candidate elimination approach to rule learning. Proceedings of the 5th Int'l Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 305-310).
11. Nau, D. S., Cao, Y., Lotem, A., & Muñoz-Avila, H. (1999). SHOP: Simple hierarchical ordered planner. Proceedings of the Sixteenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 968-973).
12. Reddy, C., & Tadepalli, P. (1997). Learning goal-decomposition rules using exercises. 14th Int'l Conference on Machine Learning (pp. 278-286).
13. Ruby, D., & Kibler, D. (1993). Learning recurring sub-plans. In S. Minton (Ed.), Machine learning methods for planning, 467-497. San Mateo, CA: Kaufmann.
14. Sacerdoti, E. (1975). The nonlinear nature of plans. Proceedings of the Fourth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 206-214).
15. Tate, A. (1977). Generating project networks. Proceedings of the Fifth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 888-893).
16. van Lent, M., & Laird, J. (1999). Learning hierarchical performance knowledge by observation. Proceedings of the Sixteenth International Conference on Machine Learning (pp. 229-238).