The effects of interpretive authority on classroom discussions of poetry: Lessons from one teacher

Communication Education

Volumn 54, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 271-288

  Smith, Michael W ^a,d   Connolly, William ^b,c  

^a TEMPLE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Rancocas Valley Regional High School   (United States)

^c ROWAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d Ritter Hall ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

Authority; Classroom discourse; Literature; Teaching and learning

Indexed keywords

EID: 31844434788     PISSN: 03634523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/03634520500442145     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Agresti, A. (2002). Categorical data analysis (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.
2. Appleman, D. (2000). Critical encounters in high school English: Teaching literary theory to adolescents. New York: Teachers College Press.
3. Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). The dialogic imagination: Four essays byM. M. Bakhtin, M. Holquist (Ed.), (C. Emerson & M. Holquist, Trans.), Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
4. Cazden, C. (2001). Classroom discourse: The language of teaching and learning (2nd ed.). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
5. Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. (1993). Inside/outside: Teacher research and knowledge. New York: Teachers College Press.
6. Geisler, C. A. (2004). Analyzing streams of language: Twelve steps to the systematic coding of text, talk, and other verbal data. Boston, MA: Pearson Longman.
7. Hillocks, G., Jr. (1995) Teaching writing as reflective practice, New York: Teachers College Press.
8. Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14-26.
9. Marshall, J. D., Smagorinsky, P., & Smith, M. W. (1995). The language of interpretation: Patterns of discourse in discussions of literature. Urbana, IL: NCTE.
10. Newkirk, T. (1984). Looking for trouble: A way to unmask our readings. College English, 46, 756-766.
11. Nystrand, M. (with A. Gamoran, R. Kachur & C. Prendergast) (1997). Opening dialogue: Understanding the dynamics of language and learning in the English classroom. New York: Teachers College Press.
12. Powell, R., McLaughlin, H. J., Savage, T., & Zehm, Z. (2001). Classroom management: Perspectives on the social curriculum. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall.
13. Rabinowitz, P. (1998). "A thousand times and never like": Re-reading for class. In P. Rabinowitz & M. W. Smith, Authorizing readers: Resistance and respect in the teaching of literature. New York: Teachers College Press.
14. Rex, L. A., & McEachen, D. (1999). "If anything is odd, inappropriate, confusing, or boring, it's probably important": The emergence of inclusive academic literacy through English classroom discussion practices. Research in the Teaching of English, 34, 65-131.
15. Rose, M. (1995). Possible lives: The promise of public education in America. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
16. Smith, M. W., & Strickland, D. (2001). Complements or conflicts: Conceptions of discussion and multicultural literature in a teachers-as-readers discussion group. Journal of Literacy Research, 33, 137-168.