Rotated weights in global Carleman estimates applied to an inverse problem for the wave equation

Inverse Problems

Volumn 22, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 265-296

  Doubova, A ^a   Osses, A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SEVILLE   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CHILE   (Chile)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ASYMPTOTIC STABILITY; FUNCTIONS; GEOMETRY; WAVE EQUATIONS;

GEOMETRICAL CONDITIONS; TIME-DEPENDENT NEUMANN BOUNDARY MEASUREMENT; WEIGHT FUNCTIONS;

INVERSE PROBLEMS;

EID: 31844433671     PISSN: 02665611     EISSN: 13616420     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1088/0266-5611/22/1/015     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Albano P and Tataru D 2000 Carleman estimates and boundary observability for a coupled parabolic-hyperbolic system Electron. J. Differ. Eqns. 22 1-15
2. Ammari H and Uhlmann G 2004 Reconstruction of the potential from partial Cauchy data for the Schrödinger equation Indiana Univ. Math. J. 53 169-83
3. Bardos C, Lebeau G and Rauch J 1992 Sharp sufficient conditions for the observation, control and stabilization of waves from the boundary SIAM J. Control. Optim. 30 1024-465
4. Bauduoin L and Fuel J-P 2002 Uniqueness and stability in an inverse problem for the Schödinger equation Inverse Problems 18 1537-54
5. Dautray R and Lions J-L 2000 Mathematical Analysis and Numerical Methods for Science and Technology (Berlin: Springer)
6. Doubova A, Osses A and Fuel J-P 2002 Exact controllability to trajectories for semilinear heat equations with discontinuous diffusion coefficients. A tribute to J L Lions ESAIM Control Optim. Calc. Var. 8 621-61
7. Fursikov A and Imanuvilov O Yu 1996 Controllability of Evolution Equations (Lecture Notes vol 34) (Korea: Seoul National University)
8. Haraux A 1989 Séries lacunaires et contrôle semi-interne des vibrations d'une plaque rectangulaire J. Math. Pures Appl. 68457-65
9. Ho L 1986 Observabilité frontière de l'équation des ondes (Boundary observability of the wave equation) C. R. Acad. Sci., Paris I 302 443-6
10. Hörmander L 1983 The Analysis of Linear Partial Differential Operators II (Berlin: Springer)
11. Imanuvilov O Yu 2002 On Carleman estimates for hyperbolic equations Asymptotic Anal. 32 185-220
12. Imanuvilov O Yu and Yamamoto M 2001 Global uniqueness and stability in determining coefficients of wave equations Commun. Partial Differ. Equns. 26 1409-25
13. Imanuvilov O Yu and Yamamoto M 2001 Global Lipschitz stability in an inverse hyperbolic problem by interior observations Inverse Problems 17 717-28
14. Imanuvilov O Yu and Yamamoto M 2003 Determination of a coefficient in an acoustic equation with a single measurement Inverse Problems 19 157-71
15. Jaffard S 1990 Contrôle interne exact des vibrations d'une plaque rectangulaire Port. Math. 47 423-9
16. Kenig C, Sjöstrand J and Uhlmann G 2006 The Calderon problem with partial data Ann. Math, at press
17. Komornik V 1994 Exact controllability and stabilization. The multiplier method Research in Applied Mathematics vol 36 (Paris: Masson)
18. Lions J-L 1988 Contrôlabilité exacte, perturbation et stabilisation de Systèmes Distribués vol 1 (Paris: Masson)
19. Lions J-L and Magenes E 1972 Non-homogeneous Boundary Value Problems and Applications (Berlin: Springer)
20. Osses A 2001 A rotated multiplier applied to the controllability of waves, elasticity, and tangential Stokes control SIAM J. Control Optim. 40 777-800
21. Puel J-P and Yamamoto M 1997 Generic well posedness in a multidimensional hyperbolic inverse problem J. Inverse Ill-posed Problems 1 53-83
22. Fuel J-P 2006 Application of Carleman Inequalities to Controllability and Inverse problems Textes de Metodos Matematicos de 1'Instituto de Matematica de 1'UFRJ, at press
23. Tataru D 1996 Carleman estimates and unique continuation for solutions to boundary value problems J. Math. Pures Appl. 75367-408
24. Yamamoto M 1999 Uniqueness and stability in multidimensional hyperbolic inverse problems J. Math. Pures Appl. 78 65-98
25. Zhang X 2001 Explicit observability inequalities for the wave equation with lower order terms by means of Carleman inequalities SIAM J. Control Optim. 39 812-34