ROC analysis for markers with mass at zero

Statistics in Medicine

Volumn 25, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 623-638

  Schisterman, Enrique F ^a   Reiser, Benjamin ^b   Faraggi, David ^b  

^a EUNICE KENNEDY SHRIVER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH AND HUMAN DEVELOPMENT   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HAIFA   (Israel)

Author keywords

Box Cox power transformations; Coronary calcium score; Diagnostic markers; Mann Whitney statistic; Mixture model

Indexed keywords

CALCIUM;

ARTICLE; CORONARY ARTERY ATHEROSCLEROSIS; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DISEASE MARKER; ELECTRON BEAM TOMOGRAPHY; EXPLANATORY VARIABLE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; ROC CURVE; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AREA UNDER CURVE; BIOLOGICAL MARKERS; CALCIUM; COHORT STUDIES; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CORONARY ARTERIOSCLEROSIS; CORONARY VESSELS; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; DIAGNOSTIC TESTS, ROUTINE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; ROC CURVE; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 31744444280     PISSN: 02776715     EISSN: 10970258     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/sim.2301     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Zhou XH, Obuchowski NA, McClish DK. Statistical Methods in Diagnostic Medicine. Wiley: New York, 2002.
2. Shapiro DE. The interpretation of diagnostic tests. Statistical Methods in Medical Research 1999; 8:113-134.
3. Zou KH, Hall WJ, Shapiro DE. Smooth non-parametric receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for continuous diagnostic tests. Statistics in Medicine 1997; 16:2143-2156.
4. Bamber DC. The area above the ordinal dominance graph and the area below the receiver operating characteristic graph. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 1975; 12:387-415.
5. Kotz S, Lumelskii Y, Pensky M. The Stress-strength Model and its Generalizations. World Scientific: Singapore, 2003.
6. Faraggi D, Reiser B. Estimation of the area under the ROC curve. Statistics in Medicine 2002; 21:3093-3106.
7. Zou KH, Tempany CM, Fielding JR, Silverman SG. Original smooth receiver operating characteristic curves estimation from continuous data: statistical methods for analyzing the predictive value of spiral CT of ureteral stones. Academic Radiology 1998; 5:680-687.
8. Zou KH, Hall WJ. Two transformation models for estimating an ROC curve derived from continuous data. Journal of Applied Statistics 2000; 27(5):621-631.
9. Zou KH, Hall WJ. Semiparametric and parametric transformation models for comparing diagnostic markers with paired design. Journal of Applied Statistics 2002; 29(6):803-816.
10. O'Malley A, Zou KH. Bayesian hierarchical transformation models for receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. ASA Proceedings of the Joint Statistical Meetings 2002; 2541-2549.
11. Shaw U, Raggi P, Schisterman EF, Berman DS, Callister TQ. Prognostic value of cardiac risk factors and coronary artery calcium screening for all-cause mortality. Radiology 2003; 228:826-833.
12. Delong ER, Delong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL. Comparing the area under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics 1988; 44:837-844.
13. Doksum KA, Wong CW. Statistical test based on transformed data. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1983; 78:411-417.
14. Faraggi D. Adjusting ROC curves and related indices for covariates. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series D-The Statistician 2003; 52:179-192.
15. Smith PJ, Thompson TJ. Correcting for confounding in analyzing receiver operating characteristic curves. Biometrical Journal 1996; 38:857-863.
16. Tosteson ANA, Begg CB. A general regression methodology for ROC curve estimation. Medical Decision Making 1988; 8:204-215.
17. Pepe MS. The Statistical Evaluation of Medical Tests for Classification and Prediction. Oxford Statistical Science Series, 2003.
18. Davidson MH, Kurlandsky SB, Kleinpell RM, Maki KC. Lipid management and the elderly. Prev Cardio 2003; 6:128-133.
19. Schisterman EF, Whitcomb BW. Coronary age as a risk factor in the modified Framingham risk score. BMC Med Imaging 2004; 4(1):1.