Lack of morphological differentiation in eastern (Rhinichthys atratulus) and western (Rhinichthys obtusus) blacknose dace in Canada

Canadian Journal of Zoology

Volumn 83, Issue 11, 2005, Pages 1502-1509

  Fraser, B A ^a   Mandrak, N E ^b   McLaughlin, R L ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

^b FISHERIES AND OCEANS CANADA   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF GUELPH   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOTECHNOLOGY; MORPHOLOGY; NATURAL SCIENCES;

BLACKNOSE DACE; DIAGNOSTIC CHARACTERS; MORPHOLOGICAL DIFFERENTIATION; SUBSPECIES;

BIODIVERSITY;

FISH; INTRASPECIFIC VARIATION; MORPHOLOGY; SUBSPECIES; TAXONOMY;

CANADA; NORTH AMERICA;

RHINICHTHYS; RHINICHTHYS ATRATULUS;

EID: 31744443577     PISSN: 00084301     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1139/z05-148     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Brown, W.L., Jr., and Wilson, E.O. 1956. Character displacement. Syst. Zool. 5: 49-64.
2. Chapleau, F., and Pageau, G. 1985. Morphological differentiation of Etheostoma olmestedi and E. nigrum (Pisces: Percidae) in Canada. Copeia, 1985(4): 855-865.
3. Hubbs, C.L., and Brown, D.E.S. 1929. Materials for a distributional study of Ontario fishes. Trans. R. Can. Inst. 17(Pt. 1): 1-56.
4. Hubbs, C.L., and Lagler, K.F. 1958. Fishes of the Great Lakes re-gion. Bull. No. 26, Cranbook Institute of Science, Bloomfield Hill, Mich.
5. Jenkins, R.E., and Burkhead, N.M. 1994. Freshwater fishes of Virginia. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, Md.
6. Jolicoeur, P. 1959. Multivariate geographical variation in the wolf Canis lupus L. Evolution, 13: 283-299.
7. Mandrak, N.E., and Crossman, E.J. 1992. Postglacial dispersal of freshwater fishes into Ontario. Can. J. Zool. 10: 2247-2259.
8. Manley, B.F.J. 1994. Multivariate statistics methods: a primer. 2nd ed. Chapman and Hall, London.
9. Matthews, W.J., Jenkins R.E., and Styron, J.T. 1982. Systematics of the two forms of blacknose dace, Rhinichthys atratulus (Pisces: Cyprinidae) in a zone of syntopy, with a review of the species group. Copeia, 1982(4): 902-920.
10. Nelson, J.S., Crossman, E.J., Espinosa-Pérez, H., Findley, L.T, Gilbert, C.R., Lea, R.N., and Williams, J.D. 2004. Common and scientific names of fishes from the United States, Canada and Mexico. 6th ed. Am. Fish. Soc. Spec. Publ. No. 29.
11. Reist, J.D. 1986. An empirical evaluation of coefficients used in residual and allometric adjustment of size covariation. Can. J. Zool. 64: 1363-1368.
12. SAS Institute Inc. 2000. SAS®. Version 8 [computer program]. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, N.C.
13. SAS Institute Inc. 2001. JMP IN®. Version 4.0.4 [computer program]. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, N.C.
14. Scott, W.B., and Crossman, E.J. 1973. Freshwater fishes of Canada. Bull. Fish. Res. Board Can. 184.
15. Siegel, S., and Castellan, N.J., Jr. 1988. Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. McGraw-Hill Inc., New York.
16. Smith, C.L. 1985. The inland fishes of New York state. The New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, Albany.
17. Sokal, R.R., and Rohlf, F.J. 1995. Biometry: the principles and , practice of statistics in biological research. 2nd ed. W.H. Freeman and Company, San Francisco, Calif.