Characteristics of assistive technology service delivery models: Stakeholder perspectives and preferences

Disability and Rehabilitation

Volumn 27, Issue 24, 2005, Pages 1461-1470

  Ripat, Jacquie ^a,b   Booth, Ann ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANITOBA   (Canada)

^b NONE   (Canada)

Author keywords

Assistive technology; Qualitative study; Service delivery model

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY; CANADA; CASE STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HUMAN; HYPOTHESIS; INTERVIEW; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; NONBIOLOGICAL MODEL; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; RECORDING;

ADULT; DECISION MAKING; DELIVERY OF HEALTH CARE; DISABLED PERSONS; FEMALE; FOCUS GROUPS; HUMANS; MALE; QUALITY OF LIFE; REHABILITATION; RESEARCH DESIGN; SELF-HELP DEVICES;

EID: 31644432109     PISSN: 09638288     EISSN: 14645165     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09638280500264535     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Cook, A and Hussey, S.(2002) Assistive technology: Principles and practice. 2nd edition. St. Louis MO: Mosby.
2. Deitz, J.(1998) Pediatric augmented mobility. In Designing and using assistive technology. Baltimore MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.
3. (2001) Assistive technology connections: A summary of meeting the needs of Californians with disabilities. Alliance for technology access.
4. Cowan, D and Turner-Smith, A. (1999) The user's perspective on the provision of electronic assistive technology: Equipping for life British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 62, pp. 75-79.
5. Cowan, D and Turner-Smith, A. (1999) The funding agencies' perspective on the provision of electronic assistive technology: Equipped for life British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 62, pp. 2-6.
6. Health Canada [Internet]. Ottawa, Canada; 2004-[cited 2004 December 14]; Available from: http://www.hcc.gc.ca/medicare/home.htm.
7. Ringaert, L. The delivery of assistive technology viewed from the consumer perspective: Independent living considerations, University of Manitoba, 1997 [unpublished].
8. Craddock, G and McCormack, L. (2002) Delivering an AT service: A client-focused, social and participatory service delivery model in assistive technology in Ireland Disability and Rehabilitation, 24, pp. 160-170.
9. Leonard, C and Biggs, H. (1996) The delivery of equipment and home adaptations to people with disabilities in New Zealand: A review of an innovative model of service provision British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 59, pp. 583-585.
10. Schoech, D and Cavalier, A and Hoover, B. (1993) A model for integrating technology into a multi-agency community service delivery system Assistive Technology, 5, pp. 11-23.
11. Nochajski, S and Oddo, C and Beaver, K. (1999) Technology and transition: Tools for success Technology and Disability, 11, pp. 93-101.
12. Speziale, H and Carpenter, D.(2003) Qualitative research in nursing: Advancing the humanistic imperative. 3rd ed. Philadephia PA: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins.
13. Berg, B.(2001) Qualitative research methods for the social sciences. 4th ed. Boston MA: Allyn and Bacon.
14. Burnard, P. (1991) A method of analysing interview transcripts in qualitative research Nurse Education Today, 11, pp. 461-466.
15. Booth, A and Ripat, J.(2001) Identifying categories of need. In Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists Annual Conference. Calgary, Alberta
16. Scherer, M. (2002) The change in emphasis from people to person: introduction to the special issue on Assistive Technology Disability and Rehabilitation, 24, pp. 1-4.
17. Hocking, C. (1999) Function or feelings: Factors in abandonment of assistive devices Technology and Disability, 11, pp. 3-11.
18. Wessels, R and deWitte, L and Andrich, R and (2000) IPPA, a user-centred approach to assess effectiveness of assistive technology provision Technology and Disability, 13, pp. 105-115.
19. Bell, P and Hinojosa, J. (1995) Perception of the impact of assistive devices on daily life of three individuals with quadriplegia Assistive Technology, 7, pp. 87-94.
20. Scherer, M. (1996) Outcomes of assistive technology use on quality of life Disability and Rehabilitation, 18, pp. 439-448.
21. deJonge, D and Rodger, S and Fitzgibbon, H. (2001) Putting technology to work: Users' perspective on integrating assistive technology in the workplace Work, 16, pp. 77-89.
22. Scherer, M.(1996) Living in the state of stuck: How technology impacts the lives of people with disabilities. 2nd ed. Cambridge MA: Brookline Books.
23. Stern, M and Restall, G and Ripat, J.(2000) The use of self-reflection to improve client-centred processes. In Individuals in context: A practical guide to client-centred practice. Thorofare NJ: Slack Inc.
24. Jedeloo, S and deWitte, L and Linssen, B and Schrijvers, A. (2002) Client satisfaction with service delivery of assistive technology for outdoor mobility Disability and Rehabilitation, 24, pp. 550-557.
25. Scherer, M.(1998) Matching person and technology (revised). Webster NY: Institute for Matching Person & Technology, Inc.
26. Law, M and Baptiste, S and Carswell, A and McColl, M and Polatajko, H and Pollock, N.(1998) Canadian Occupational Performance Measure. Ottawa ON: CAOT Publications.
27. Price, R and Glickstein, M and Horton, D and Sherman, S and Fazio, R.(1987) Principles of psychology 2nd ed. Glenview IL: Scott, Foresman and Company.
28. Riemer-Reiss, M. (1999) Applying Rogers' diffusion of innovations theory to assistive technology discontinuance Journal of Applied Rehabilitation Counseling, 30, pp. 16-21.
29. Lenker, J and Paquet, V. (2003) A review of conceptual models for assistive technology outcomes research and practice Assistive Technology, 15, pp. 1-15.
30. Louise-Bender Pape, T and Kim, J and Weiner, B. (2002) The shaping of individual meanings assigned to assistive technology: A review of personal factors Disability and Rehabilitation, 24, pp. 5-20.