Should the gold rule? Assessing "equivalent protections" for research participants across international borders

Hastings Center Report

Volumn 35, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 12-13

  Sugarman, Jeremy ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADVISORY COMMITTEE; BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; GOVERNMENT REGULATION; HUMAN; INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION; LAW; LEGAL ASPECT; RESEARCH ETHICS; RESEARCH SUBJECT; SHORT SURVEY; STANDARD; UNITED STATES;

BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;

ADVISORY COMMITTEES; ETHICS, RESEARCH; GOVERNMENT REGULATION; HUMANS; INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION; LEGISLATION; RESEARCH SUBJECTS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 31544480107     PISSN: 00930334     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/3528327     Document Type: Short Survey

References (5)

1. J. Sugarman et al., "International Perspectives on Protecting Human Research Subjects," in Ethical Issues in International Research: Clinical Trials in Developing Countries, Volume II: Commissioned Papers and Staff Analysis (Bethesda, Md.: National Bioethics Advisory Commission, May 2001), E1-30.
2. 45 Code of Federal Regulations 46. 101(h).
3. Equivalent Protections Working Group, Department of Health and Human Services, Report of the Equivalent Protections Working Group, July 17, 2003; available at http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/international/EPWGReport2003.pdf.
4. Department of Health and Human Services, "Protection of Human Subjects: Proposed Criteria for Determinations of Equivalent Protection," Federal Register 70, no. 57 (March 25, 2005): 15322-15327, 15323.
5. Sugarman et al., "International Perspectives."