Institutional perspectives on science-policy boundaries

Science and Public Policy

Volumn 32, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 418-422

  Raman, Sujatha ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK; SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY; TECHNOLOGY POLICY;

EID: 31544478526     PISSN: 03023427     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3152/147154305781779245     Document Type: Editorial

References (21)

1. Commission of the European Communities (2001a), European Governance: A White Paper, COM 428, 25 July, Brussels.
2. Commission of the European Communities (2001b), Science and Society: Action Plan, COM 714 (final), 4 December, Brussels.
3. Etzkowitz, Henry, and Loet Leydesdorff (2000), "The dynamics of innovation: from national systems and 'Mode 2' to a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations", Research Policy, 29, pages 109-123.
4. Evans, Robert (1997), "Soothsaying or science: falsification, uncertainty and social change in macro-econometric modelling", Social Studies of Sciences, 27(3), pages 395-438.
5. Fischer, Frank (1990), Technocracy and the Politics of Expertise (Sage Publishers, Newbury Park CA).
6. Gibbons, Michael, Camille Limoges, Helga Nowotny, Simon Schwartzman, Peter Scott and Martin Trow (1994), The New Production of Knowledge (Sage Publishers, London).
7. Gieryn, Thomas (1983), "Boundary work and the demarcation of science from non-science: strains and interests in professional ideologies of scientists", American Sociological Review, 48, pages 781-795.
8. Gieryn, Thomas (1995), "Boundaries of science" in S Jasanoff, G E Markle, J C Petersen and T Pinch (editors), Handbook of Science and Technology Studies (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks CA).
9. Guston, David (2000), Between Politics and Science: Assuring the integrity and productivity of research (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).
10. Guston, David (2001), "Boundary organisations in environmental policy and science: an introduction", Science, Technology and Human Values, 26(4), pages 399-408.
11. Halffman, Willem, and Rob Hoppe (2005), "Science-policy boundaries: a changing division of labour in Dutch expert policy advice", in S Maassen and P Weingart (editors), Democratization of Expertise? Exploring Novel forms of Scientific Advice in Political Decision-making (Kluwer, Dordrecht).
12. Hellström, Tomas, and Merle Jacob (2003), "Boundary organisations in science: from discourse to construction", Science and Public Policy, 30(4), pages 235-238.
13. House of Lords Select Committee on Science and Technology (2000), Science and Society, 23 February (HMSO, London).
14. Hunt, Jane, and Simon Shackley (1999), "Reconceiving science and policy: academic, fiducial and bureaucratic knowledge", Minerva, 37, pages 141-164.
15. Jacob, Merle (2005), "Boundary work in contemporary science policy: a review", Prometheus, 23(2), pages 195-207.
16. Jasanoff, Sheila (1987), "Contested boundaries in policy-relevant science", Social Studies of Science, 17, pages 195-230.
17. Jasanoff, Sheila (1990), The Fifth Branch: science advisers as policymakers (Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA).
18. OST, Office of Science and Technology (2000), Guidelines 2000: Scientific Advice and Policy Making (Department of Trade and Industry, HMSO, London).
19. OST, Office of Science and Technology (2001), Code of Practice for Scientific Advisory Committees (Department of Trade and Industry, HMSO, London).
20. Slaughter, Sheila, and Larry Leslie (1997), Academic Capitalism: Politics, Policies, and the Entrepreneurial University (The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore MA).
21. Weingart, Peter (1999), "Scientific expertise and political accountability", Science and Public Policy, 26(3), pages 151-161.