Double simulated annealing for functional mri analysis

Journal of the Chinese Institute of Industrial Engineers

Volumn 22, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 497-508

  Yeh, Jinn Yi ^a   Fu, Ja Chih ^a  

^a DA YEH UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Activation area; Functional magnetic resonance imaging; Receiver operating characteristic; Similarity analysis; Simulated annealing

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTATIONAL METHODS; LINEAR SYSTEMS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MATHEMATICAL MODELS;

ACTIVATION AREA; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; RECEIVER-OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; SIMILARITY ANALYSIS;

SIMULATED ANNEALING;

EID: 31544476253     PISSN: 10170669     EISSN: 21517606     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10170660509509318     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Singh, M., Kim, H., Kim, T., and Khosla, D., 1994. Functional at 1.5. IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, 41 (6):1649–1655.
2. Kim, T., Al-Dayeh, L., and Singh, M., 1999. FMRI artifacts reduction using Bayesian image processing. IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, 46 (6):2134–2140.
3. Singh, M., Al-Dayeh, L., Petel, P., Kim, T., Guclu, C., and Nalcioglu, O., 1998. Correction for head movements in multi-slice EPI functional MRI. IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, 45 (4):2162–2166.
4. Bandettini, P. A., Jesmanowicz, A., Wong, E. C., and Hyde, J. S., 1993. Processing strategies for time-course data sets in functional MRI of the human brain. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 30:161–173.
5. Friston, K. J., Jezzard, P., and Turner, R., 1994. Analysis of functional MRI time-series. Human Brain Mapping, 1:153–171.
6. Constable, R. T., McCarthy, G., Allison, T., Anderson, A. W., and Gore, J. C., 1993. Functional Brain imaging at 1.5 T using conventional gradient echo MR imaging technique. Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 11:451–459.
7. Baker, J. R., Weisskoff, R. M., Stern, C. E., 1994. “ Statistical assessment of functional MRI signal change ”. In Proceedings of the 2nd Annual Meeting of the Society of Magnetic Resonance 626San Francisco, CA
8. Baumgartner, R., Windischberger, C., and Moser, E., 1998. Quantification in functional magnetic resonance imaging:fuzzy clustering vs. correlation analysis. Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 16:115–125.
9. Golay, X, Kollias, S., Stoll, G., Meier, D., Valavanis, A., and Boesiger, P., 1998. A new correlation-based fuzzy logic clustering algorithm for fMRI. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 40:249–260.
10. Sychra, J. J., Bandettini, P. A., Bhattacharya, N., and Lin, Q., 1994. Synthetic images by subspace transforms I:principal components images and related filters. Medical Physics, 21:193–201.
11. Baumgartner, R. L. Ryner, Richter, W., Summers, R., Jarmasz, M., and Somorjai, R., 2000. Comparison of two exploratory data analytical methods for fMRI:fuzzy clustering vs. principal component analysis. Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 18:89–94.
12. Pal, N. R., Bezdek, J. C., and Tsao, E.C.-K., 1993. Generalized clustering networks and Kohonen's self-organizing schem. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 4:549–556.
13. Chuang, K., Chiu, M., Lin, C., and Chen, J., 1999. Model-free functional MRI analysis using Kohonen clustering neural network and fuzzy C-means. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 18 (12):1117–1128.
14. Baumgartner, R., Somorjai, R., Summers, R., and Richter, W., 2001. Ranking fMRI time courses by minimum spanning trees:assessing coactivation in fMRI. NeuroImage, 13:734–742.
15. Dimitriadou, E., Barth, M., Windischberger, C., Hornik, K., and Moser, E., 2004. A quantitative comparison of functional MRI cluster analysis. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, 31:57–71.
16. Friston, K., 2003. Statistical Parametric Mapping (SPM) UK:Wellcome Department of Imaging Neuroscience, University College London.
17. Starck, V., 1996. “ Implementation of simulated annealing optimization method for APLAC circuit simulator ”. In Electrical Engineering Espoo:Helsinki University of Technology. Finland:Master's Thesis
18. Karayiammis, N. B., and Pai, P., 1999. Segmentation of magnetic resonance images using fuzzy algorithms for learning vector quantization. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 8 (2):172–180.
19. Chen, S., and Luk, B. L., 1999. Adaptive simulated annealing for optimization in signal processing application. Signal Processing, 79:117–128.
20. Kirkpatrick, S., Gelatt, C. D., and Vechi, M. P., 1983. Optimization by simulated annealing. Science, 220 (4598):671–680.
21. Van Erkel, A. R., and Th. Pattynama, P. M., 1998. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis:basic principles and applications in radiology. European Journal of Radiology, 27:88–94.
22. Skudlarski, P., Constable, R. T., and Gore, J. C., 1999. ROC analysis of statistical methods used in functional MRI:individual subjects. NeuroImage, 9:311–329.
23. Shan, Z. Y., Yue, G. H., and Liu, J. Z., 2002. Automated histogram-based brain segmentation in T1-weighted three-dimensional magnetic resonance head images. NeuroImage, 17:1587–1598.
24. Lange, N., Strother, S. C., Anderson, J. R., Nielsen, F. A., 1999. Plurality and resemblance in fMRI data analysis. NeuroImage, 10:282–303.
25. Gavrilescu, M., Shaw, M. E., Stuart, G. W., Eckersley, P., 2002. Simulation of the effects of global normalization procedures in functional MRI. NeuroImage, 17:532–542.