Visual evoked potentials and event related potentials in congenitally deaf subjects

Physiological Research

Volumn 54, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 577-583

  Chlubnova J ^a   Kremlacek J ^a   Kubova Z ^a   Kuba, M ^a  

^a CHARLES UNIVERSITY   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

Deaf subjects; Event related potentials; Motion VEPs; Pattern reversal VEPs; Sign language

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; BRAIN CORTEX; BRAIN FUNCTION; CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COGNITION; CONGENITAL DEAFNESS; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; EVOKED VISUAL RESPONSE; FEMALE; HEARING; HUMAN; MALE; OCCIPITAL CORTEX; SEX ROLE; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISION; VISUAL STIMULATION; VISUAL SYSTEM;

ADOLESCENT; COGNITION; DEAFNESS; EVOKED POTENTIALS, VISUAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; OCCIPITAL LOBE; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; SIGN LANGUAGE; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 31544472850     PISSN: 08628408     EISSN: 08628408     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. ACHIM A: Signal detection in averaged evoked potentials: Monte Carlo comparison of the sensitivity of different methods. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 96: 574-584, 1995.
2. ARMSTRONG BA, SEVILLE HJ, HILLYARD SA, MITCHELL TV: Auditory deprivation affects processing of motion, but not color. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 14: 422-434, 2002.
3. BAVELIER D, TOMANN A, HUTTON C, MITCHELL T, CORINA D, LIU G, SEVILLE H: Visual attention to the periphery is enhanced in congenitally deaf individuals. J Neurosci 20: 1-6, 2000.
4. BRANDEIS D, LEHMANN D: Event-related potentials of the brain and cognitive processes: approaches and applications. Neuropsychologia 24: 151-168, 1986.
5. FINNEY EM, DOBKINS KR: Visual contrast sensitivity in deaf versus hearing populations: exploring the perceptual consequences of auditory deprivation and experience with a visual language. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 11: 171-183, 2001.
6. FINNEY EM, CLEMENTZ BA, HICKOK G, DOBKINS KR: Visual stimuli activate auditory cortex in deaf subjects: evidence from MEG. Neuroreport 14: 1425-1427, 2003.
7. KREMLÁČEK J, KUBA M, KUBOVÁ Z, VÍT F: Simple and powerful visual stimulus generator. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 58: 175-180, 1999.
8. KUBA M, KUBOVÁ Z: Visual evoked potentials specific for motion-onset. Doc Ophthalmol 80: 83-89, 1992.
9. KUBA M, KREMLÁČEK J, KUBOVÁ Z: Cognitive evoked potentials related to visual perception of motion in human subjects. Physiol Res 47: 265-270, 1998.
10. KUBA M, CHLUBNOVÁ J, KREMLÁČEK J, KUBOVÁ Z: Maturation and ageing of central nervous system according to visual evoked potentials parameters. Physiol Res 53: 52P, 2004.
11. KUBOVÁ Z, KUBA M, SPEKREIJSE H, BLAKEMORE C: Contrast dependence of motion-onset and pattern-reversal evoked potentials. Vision Res 35: 197-205, 1995.
12. KUBOVÁ Z, KUBA M, PEREGRIN J, NOVÁKOVÁ V: Visual evoked potential evidence for magnocellular system deficit in dyslexia. Physiol Res 45: 87-89, 1996.
13. KUBOVÁ Z, KREMLÁČEK J, SZANYI J, CHLUBNOVÁ J, KUBA M: Visual event related potentials to moving stimuli: normative data. Physiol Res 51: 199-204, 2002.
14. KUBOVÁ Z, CHLUBNOVÁ J, SZANYI J, KUBA M, KREMLÁČEK J: Influence of physiological changes of glycemia on VEPs and visual ERPs. Physiol Res 54: 245-250, 2005.
15. NEVILLE HJ, LAWSON D: Attention to central and peripheral visual space in a movement detection task: an eventrelated potential and behavioral study. II. Congenitally deaf adults. Brain Res 405: 268-283, 1987.
16. POLICH J: P300 clinical utility and control of variability. J Clin Neurophysiol 15: 14-33, 1998.
17. SAMAR VJ, PARASNIS I, BERENT GP: Deaf poor readers' pattern reversal visual evoked potentials suggest magnocellular system deficits: implications for diagnostic neuroimaging of dyslexia in deaf individuals. Brain Lang 80: 21-44, 2002.
18. TANAKA K, SAITO H: Analysis of motion of the visual field by direction, expansion/contraction, and rotation cells clustered in the dorsal part of the medial superior temporal area of the macaque monkey. J Neurophysiol 62: 626-41, 1989.