Documentation for institutional repositories

Learned Publishing

Volumn 19, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 57-71

  Probets, Steve ^a   Jenkins, Celia ^a  

^a LOUGHBOROUGH UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 31544472347     PISSN: 09531513     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1087/095315106775122556     Document Type: Review

References (32)

1. UK House of Commons Science and Technology Select Committee Recommendations. 2004. http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200304/ cmselect/cmsctech/399/39903.htm
2. National Institutes of Health recommendations. 2004. http://thomas.loc. gov/cgi-bin/cpquery/?&db_id=cp108&r_n=hr636.108&sel=TOC_338641&
3. arXiv.org e-print archive, http://arxiv.org/
4. Focus on Access to Institutional Resources (FAIR) Programme. http://www.jisc.ac.uk/index.cfm?name = programme_fair
5. House of Commons Select Enquiry, Third Special Report - Government Response. Feb 2005. http://www.parliament.the-stationery-office.co.uk/pa/ cm200405/cmselect/cmsctech/249/24904.htm
6. Directory of Open Access Repositories. 2005. http://www.opendoar.org/
7. Open Archives Initiative Protocol for Metadata Harvesting. http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/openarchivesprotocol.html
8. Swan, A., Needham, P., Probets, S.G., Muir, A., Oppenheim, C., O'Brien, E.A., Hardy, R., Rowland, J.F.B. and Brown, S. Developing a model for e-prints and open access journal content in UK further and higher education. Learned Publishing, 2005:18(1), 25-40 URL: www.ingentaselect.com/rpsv/catchword/alpsp/ 09531513/v18n1/s5/p25
9. Mackie, M. Filling Institutional repositories: practical strategies from the DAEDALUS project. Ariadne, 2004:39. http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue39/mackie/
10. The 2004 IR Workshop Program. SPARC group. Nov 2004. http://www.arl.org/ sparc/meetings/ir04/ir04speak.html
11. California Digital Library eScholarship Repository. http://repositories. cdlib.org/escholarship/policies.html
12. MIT DSpace Repository, http://libraries.mit.edu/dspace-mit/mit/policies/ index.html
13. Queensland University of Technology E-print Repository for Research Output, http://www.qut.edu.au/admin/mopp/F/F_01_03.html
14. Hong Kong University of Science and Technology Institutional Repository. http://library.ust.hk/info/repository.html
15. University of Melbourne - Eprint Repository. http://www.lib.unimelb.edu. au/eprints/collectionpolicy.htm
16. Open University ePrint Pilot Service, http://libeprints.open.ac.uk/about. html
17. University of Southampton Electronics and Computer Science (ECS) ePrints Service, http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lac/archpol.html
18. Yeates, R. Over the horizon: institutional repositories. VINE: The Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems, 2003:33(2), 96-100.
19. Lynch, C.A. Institutional repositories: essential infrastructure for scholarship in the digital age. ARL Newsletter, 2003:226. http://www.arl.org/ newsltr/226/ir.html
20. Day, M., Institutional repositories and research assessment. 2005. http://www.rdn.ac.uk/projects/eprints-uk/docs/studies/rae/rae-study.pdf
21. Callan, P. The development and implementation of a university-wide self-archiving policy at Queensland University of Technology (QUT): insights from the frontline. 2004. http://www.arl.org/sparc/meetings/ir04/presentations/ callan_files/callan.pdf
22. Johnson, R.K. Institutional repositories: partnering with faculty to enhance scholarly communication. D-Lib Magazine, 2002: 8(11). http://www.dlib.org/dlib/november02/johnson/11johnson.html
23. Pinfield, S., Gardner, M. and MacColl, J. Setting up an institutional e-print archive. Ariadne, 2002:31. http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue31/eprint- archives/
24. Lagoze, C., Van de Sompel, H., Nelson, M. and Warner, S. Conveying Rights Expressions about meta-data in the OAI-PMH Framework. 2004. http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/guidelines-rights.htm
25. RoMEO Project, http://www.lboro.ac.uk/departments/ls/disreseach/romeo/ index.html
26. Publisher Copyright Policies and Self Archiving. http://www.sherpa.ac.uk/ romeo.php
27. Fyffe, R. and Forrest Warner, B. Scholarly communication in a digital world: the role of an institutional repository. 2003. http://kuschlarworks.ku. edu/retrieve/186/Institutional+repository+White+Paper.doc
28. Gadd, E.A., Oppenheim, C. and Probets, S.G. Romeo Studies 2: how academics want to protect their open-access research papers. Journal of Information Science, 2003:29(5), 333-56.
29. Gadd, E.A., Oppenheim, C. and Probets, S.G. Romeo 3: How academics expect to use open-access papers. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 2003:35(3), 171-87.
30. Pinfield, S. and James, H. The digital preservation of e-prints. DLib Magazine, 2003:9(9). http://www.dlib.org/dlib/september03/pinfield/09pinfield. html
31. Swan, A., Needham, P., Probets, S., Muir, A., O'Brien, A., Oppenheim, C., Hardy, R. and Rowland, F. Delivery, management and access model for e-prints and open access journals within further and higher education. 2004. http://www.jisc.ac.uk/journals_work.html
32. Research Councils UK. RCUK announces proposed position on access to research outputs. Jun 2005. http://www.rcuk.ac.uk/press/20050628openaccess.asp