Effect of herbicides on field violet (Viola arvensis) in four direct-seeded canola management systems

Weed Technology

Volumn 19, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 608-622

  Degenhardt, Rory E ^f   Harker, K Neil ^f   Topinka, A Keith ^f   McGregor, William R ^f   Hall, Linda M ^a,b,c,d,e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SASKATCHEWAN   (Canada)

^b LACOMBE RESEARCH CENTRE   (Canada)

^c ALBERTA AGRICULTURE AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT   (Canada)

^d Dow AgroSciences Canada Inc   (Canada)

^e UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

^f NONE

Author keywords

Canola management systems; Clopyralid; Ethametsulfuron; Herbicide evaluation; Weed control

Indexed keywords

ANNUAL PLANT; CANOLA; CHEMICAL CONTROL; CULTIVAR; GROWTH RESPONSE; HERBICIDE; TILLAGE; WEED CONTROL; YIELD RESPONSE;

ALBERTA; CANADA; NORTH AMERICA;

BRASSICA NAPUS; BRASSICA NAPUS VAR. NAPUS; VIOLA ARVENSIS; VIOLACEAE;

EID: 31544464989     PISSN: 0890037X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1614/WT-04-154R1.1     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada. 1995. A National Ecological Framework for Canada. Ottawa, ON: Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Ecological Stratification Working Group, Research Branch, Centre for Land and Biological Resources Research, and Environment Canada, State of the Environment Directorate, Ecozone Analysis Branch.
2. Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada. 1999. Canadian Ecodistrict Climate Normals 1961-1990. Web Page: http://sis.agr.gc.ca/cansis/nsdb/ecostrat/district/ climate.html. Accessed: January 11, 2003.
3. Alberta Agriculture, Food, and Rural Development. 1999. Winter Annual Weed Control in Direct Seeding Systems. Agdex 519-5. Edmonton, AB: Alberta Agriculture, Food, and Rural Development, Print Media Branch. 5 p.
4. Alex, J. F. and C. M. Switzer. 1976. Ontario Weeds: Descriptions, Illustrations and Keys to their Identification. Guelph, ON: Ontario Agricultural College. 200 p.
5. Ali, S. 2003. Crop Protection 2003. Agdex 606-1. Edmonton, AB: Alberta Agriculture, Food, and Rural Development. 520 p.
6. Bachthaler, V. G., F. Neuner, and H. Kees. 1986. Development of the field pansy (Viola arvensis Murr.) in dependence of soil conditions and agricultural management. Nachrichtenbl. Pflanzenschutz DDR 38:33-41.
7. Baskin, J. M. and C. C. Baskin. 1995. Variation in the annual dormancy cycle in buried seeds of the weedy winter annual Viola arvensis. Weed Res. 35:353-362.
8. Becker, R., A. Ulrich, C. Hedtke, and B. Honermeier. 2001. Impact of transgenic herbicide resistant rape on the agroecosystem. Bundesgesundh.bl. Gesundh.forsch. Gesundh.schutz 44:159-167.
9. Blackshaw, R. E., G. Anderson, and J. Dekker. 1987. Interference of Sinapsis arvensis L. and Chenopodium album L. in spring rapeseed (Brassica napus L.). Weed Res. 27:207-213.
10. Brierly, J. A., T. C. Martin, and D. J. Speiss, eds. 2001. AGRASID 3.0: Agricultural Region of Alberta Soil Inventory Database (Version 3.0). Alberta Soil Information Centre, Research Branch, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada and Conservation and Development Branch, Alberta Agriculture, Food, and Rural Development: Web page: http://wwwl.agnc. gov.ab.ca/Sdepartment/deptdocs.nsf/all/ sag6903? Accessed: January 1, 2003.
11. Bruce, J. A., J. Boyd, D. Penner, and J. J. Kells. 1996. Effect of growth stage and environment on foliar absorption, translocation, metabolism, and activity of nicosulfuron in quackgrass (Elytrigia repens). Weed Sci. 44: 447-454.
12. [CASCC] Canadian Agricultural Services Coordinating Committee. 1998. Research report ECW/EDI ID: 98FV3IET. Ottawa, ON: Expert Committee on Weeds, Eastern Section, Research Branch, Agriculture Canada.
13. Clayton, G. W., K. N. Harker, J. T. O'Donovan, M. N. Baig, and M. J. Kidnie. 2002. Glyphosate timing and tillage system effects on glyphosate-resistant canola (Brassica napus). Weed Technol. 16:124-130.
14. de St. Remy, E. A. and P. A. O'Sullivan. 1986. Duration of tartary buckwheat (Fagopyrum tataricum) interference in several crops. Weed Sci. 34:381-286.
15. Donn, G. 1982. Der einfluß von klimafaktoren auf die herbizide wirkung von ammonium-(3-amino-3-carboxy-propyl)-methylphosphinat (glufosinate). Mededelingen van de Faculteit Landbouwwetenschappen Rijksuniversiteit Gent 647:105-110.
16. Doohan, D. J. and T. J. Monaco. 1992. The biology of Canadian weeds. 99. Viola arvensis Murr. Can. J. Plant Sci. 72:187-201.
17. Doohan, D. J., T. J. Monaco, and T. J. Sheets. 1991. Factors influencing germination of field violet (Viola arvensis). Weed Sci. 39:601-606.
18. Doran, J. W. and M. S. Smith. 1987. Organic matter management and utilization of soil and fertilizer nutrients. In Soil Fertility and Organic Matter as Critical Components of Production Systems. Madison, WI: Soil Science Society of America Special Publication 19. Pp. 53-72.
19. Downey, R. K. and J. Buth. 2003. Transgenic rapeseed-grower adoption and consumer acceptance. In Proceedings of the 11th International Rapeseed Congress. Copenhagen, Denmark: Narayana. Pp. 1190-1194.
20. Etheridge, R. E., W. E. Hart, R. M. Hayes, and T. C. Mueller. 2001. Effect of venturi-type nozzles and application volume on postemergence herbicide efficacy. Weed Technol. 15:75-80.
21. Ewald, J. A. and N. J. Aebischer. 1999. Pesticide Use, Avian Food Resources and Bird Densities in Sussex. Peterborough, UK: Joint Nature Conservation Committee JNCC Report 296. 103 p.
22. Fogelfors, H. 1973. The development of some weed species under different conditions of light and their competitive ability in barley stands. In Reports of the Agricultural College of Sweden. Series B, Volume 19. Uppsala, Sweden: Lantbrukshögskolan. 233 p.
23. Forcella, F. 1987. Herbicide resistant crops: yield penalties and weed thresholds for oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.). Weed Res. 27:31-34.
24. Froment, M. A. and D. Turley. 1998. Evaluation of herbicides for autumn broad-leaved weed control in winter linseed (Linum usitatissimum). Tests Agrochem. Cultiv. 19:28-29.
25. Froud-Williams, R. J., R. J. Chancellor, and D.S.H. Drennan. 1984. The effects of seed burial and soil disturbance on emergence and survival of arable weeds in relation to minimal cultivation. J. Appl. Ecol. 21:629-641.
26. Gummesson, G. 1983. Chemical and non-chemical control-changes in weed stand following different control measures. In Swedish Weed Conference. Volume 24. Uppsala, Sweden: College of Agriculture, Department of Plant Husbandry and Research Information Centre. 239 p.
27. Hyvonen, T., E. Ketoja, and J. Salonen. 2003. Abundance of weeds in spring cereal fields in Finland. Weed Res. 43:348-356.
28. Kakes, P. 1982. Genecological investigations on zinc plants. V. Barriers to gene flow limiting the introgression of Viola arvensis (Murr.) into Viola calaminaria Lej. Spp. Westfalica (Lej.) Ernst. Acta Bot. Neerl. 31:371-378.
29. Kenward, M. G. and J. H. Roger. 1997. Small sample inference for fixed effects from restricted maximum likelihood. Biometrics 53:983-997.
30. Krausz, R. E. and B. G. Young. 2001. Response of glyphosate-resistant soybean (Glycine max) to trimethylsulfonium and isopropylamine salts of glyphosate. Weed Technol. 15:745-749.
31. Lanclos, D. Y., E. P. Webster, W. Zhang, and S. D. Linscombe. 2003. Response of glufosinate-resistant rice (Oryza sativa) to glufosinate application timings. Weed Technol. 17:157-160.
32. Leeson, J. Y., A. G. Thomas, and L. M. Hall. 2002. Alberta Weed Survey of Cereal, Oilseed and Pulse Crops in 2001. Saskatoon, SK: Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Saskatoon Research Centre Weed Survey Series Publication 02-1.
33. Lundkvist, A. 1997. Predicting optimal application time for herbicides from estimated growth rate of weeds. Agric. Sys. 54:223-242.
34. Madsen, K. H. and J. C. Streibig. 1999. Modeling of Herbicide Use in Genetically Modified Herbicide Resistant Crops 2. Svendborg, Denmark: Ministry of Environment and Energy, Danish Environmental Protection Agency Environmental Project 450.
35. Mallory-Smith, C. A. and E. J. Retzinger. 2003. Revised classification of herbicides by site of action for weed resistance management strategies. Weed Technol. 17:605-619.
36. Marshall, G., I. N. Morrison, L. Friesen, and W. Rother. 1989. Effects of 'volunteer' wheat and barley on the growth and yield of rapeseed. Can. J. Plant Sci. 69:445-453.
37. Martin, S. G., R. C. Van Acker, and L. F. Friesen. 2001. Critical period of weed control in spring canola. Weed Sci. 49:326-333.
38. Nordmeyer, H. and M. Dunker. 1999. Variable weed densities and soil properties in a weed mapping concept for patchy weed control. In Proceedings of the 2nd European Conference on Precision Agriculture. Sheffield, UK: Sheffield Academic. Pp. 453-462.
39. O'Donovan, J. T. 1992. Seed yields of canola and volunteer barley as influenced by their relative times of emergence. Can. J. Plant Sci. 72:263-267.
40. Odum, E. P. 1965. Germination of ancient seeds: floristical observations and experiments with archaeologically dated soil samples. Dansk Bot. Ark. 24:2.
41. Petersen, J. and K. Hurle. 2001. Influence of climatic conditions and plant physiology on glufosinate-ammonium efficacy. Weed Res. 41:31-39.
42. Pilorgé, E. and C. Mircovich. 1999. Weed control strategies using GMO herbicide tolerant oilseed rape. In Proceedings of the 10th International Rapeseed Congress: Web page: www.regional.org.au/au/gcirc/2/325.htm. Accessed: January 1, 2003.
43. Prostko, E. P., J. K. Norsworthy, and P. A. Raymer. 2003. Soybean (Glycine max) response to glyphosate, difiubenzuron, and boron combinations. Weed Technol. 17:186-189.
44. [SAS] Statistical Analysis Systems. 1999. SAS/STAT® User's Guide, Version 8. Cary, NC: SAS.
45. Schroeder, D., H. Mueller-Schaerer, and C.S.A. Stinson. 1993. A European weed survey in 10 major crop systems to identify targets for biological control. Weed Res. 33:449-458.
46. Seefeldt, S. S., J. E. Jensen, and E. P. Fuerst. 1995. Log-logistic analysis of herbicide dose-response relationships. Weed Technol. 9:218-227.
47. Statistics Canada. 2002. 2001 Census of Agriculture. Web page: http://www.statcan.ca/english/freepub/95F0301XIE/index.htm. Accessed: January 1, 2003.
48. Steel, R. G. and J. H. Torrie. 1980. Principles and Procedures of Statistics: A Biometrical Approach. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill. 633 p.
49. Tabachnick, B. G. and L. S. Fidell. 2001. Using Multivariate Statistics. 4th ed. Boston: Allyn and Bacon. 966 p.
50. Thomas, A. G., R. F. Wise, B. L. Frick, and L. T. Juras. 1996. Saskatchewan Weed Survey of Cereal, Oilseed and Pulse Crops in 1995. Saskatoon, SK: Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Saskatoon Research Centre Weed Survey Series Publication 96-1.
51. Thomas, A. G., B. L. Frick, and L. M. Hall. 1998. Alberta Weed Survey of Cereal and Oilseed Crops in 1997. Saskatoon, SK: Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Saskatoon Research Centre Weed Survey Series Publication 98-2.
52. Wallsgrove, R. M., A. J. Keys, P. J. Lea, and B. J. Miflin. 1983. Photosynthesis, photorespiration and nitrogen metabolism. Plant Cell. Environ. 6: 301-309.
53. Wicks, G. A. and G. E. Hanson. 1995. Effect of rainfall on glyphosate plus 2,4-D performance on Echinochloa crus-galli. Weed Sci. 43:666-670.
54. Wicks, G. A., W. L. Felton, and S. M. Welsby. 1993. Effect of rainfall on glyphosate performance on stressed grass weeds following wheat harvest. Plant Prot. Q. 8:2-6.
55. Xie, H. S., A. I. Hsiao, and W. A. Quick. 1997. Influence of drought on graminicide phytotoxicity in wild oat (Avena fatua) grown under different temperature and humidity conditions. J. Plant Growth Regul. 16:233-237.