Scientists' conceptions of the boundaries between their own research and policy

Science and Public Policy

Volumn 32, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 435-444

  Waterton, Claire ^a  

^a LANCASTER UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACADEMIC RESEARCH; SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY;

EID: 31544451826     PISSN: 03023427     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3152/147154305781779218     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Abbott, Andrew (1988), The System of Professions (Chicago University Press, Chicago).
2. Callon, Michel (1994), "Is science a public good?", Science Technology and Human Values, 19, pages 395-424.
3. Dickson, David (2000), "UK Ministry under fire over handling of BSE research", Nature, 407, 26 October, page 932.
4. Etzkowitz, Henry, and Loet Leyesdorff (1997), Universities and the Global Knowledge Economy (Pinter Press, Herndon, VA).
5. Etzkowitz, Henry, and Loet Leyesdorff (2000), "The dynamics of innovation: from national systems and 'Mode 2' to a triple helix of university-industry-government relations", Research Policy, 29, pages 109-123.
6. Gibbons, Michael, Camille Limoges, Helga Nowotny, S Schwartzman, Peter Scott and M Trow (1994), The New Production of Knowledge (Sage, London).
7. Gieryn, Thomas (1995), "Boundaries of science", in S Jasanoff, G E Markle, J C Petersen and T Pinch (1995), Handbook of Science and Technology Studies (Sage, London).
8. Gieryn, Thomas (1999), Cultural Boundaries of Science: Credibility on the Line (Chicago University Press, Chicago).
9. Gilbert, Nigel, and Mike Mulkay (1984), Opening Pandora's Box: a Sociological Analysis of Scientists' Discourse (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).
10. Godin, B, and Yves Gingras (2000), "The place of universities in the production of knowledge production", Research Policy, 29, pages 273-278.
11. Guston, David (1999), "Stabilizing the boundary between US politics and science: the role of the Office of Technology Transfer as a boundary organization", Social Studies of Science, 29(1), pages 87-112.
12. Guston, David (2001), "Boundary organizations in environmental policy and science: an introduction", Science, Technology and Human Values, 26(4), pages 399-408.
13. HMSO (1918), "Report on the machinery of Government of the Ministry of Reconstruction", Cmnd 9230 (Haldene Enquiry) (HMSO, London).
14. HMSO (1971), "Rothschild report: the organization and management of government research and development", Cmnd 4814 (HMSO, London).
15. HMSO (1972), "Rothschild report: a framework for government research and development", Cmnd 5046 (HMSO, London).
16. Hunt, Jane, and Simon Shackley (1999), "Reconceiving science and policy: academic, fiducial and bureaucratic knowledge", Minerva, 37, pages 141-164.
17. Jacob, Merle, and Tomas Hellstrom (editors) (2000), The Future of Knowledge Production in the Academy (Open University Press, Milton Keynes).
18. Jasanoff, Sheila (1990), The Fifth Branch; Science Advisers as Policymakers (Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA).
19. Jasanoff, Sheila (editor) (2004), States of Knowledge: the Co-Production of Science and Social Order (Routledge, London).
20. Jasanoff, Sheila, and Brian Wynne (1998), "Science and decision-making", in S Rayner and E Malone Human Choice and Climate Change: the Societal Framework (Battelle, Columbus OH).
21. Knorr-Cetina, Karen (1981), The Manufacture of Knowledge: an Essay on the Constructivist and Contextual Nature of Science (Pergamon Press, Oxford).
22. Kuhn, Thomas (1962), The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).
23. Latour, Bruno (1993), We Have Never Been Modern, translator Catherine Porter (Harvester Wheatsheaf, Hemel Hempstead).
24. Merton, Robert (1973), The Sociology of Science (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).
25. Michael, Mike (1996), Constructing Identities (Sage, London).
26. Miller, Clarke (2001), "Hybrid management: boundary organisations, science policy, and environmental governance in the climate regime", Science Technology and Human Values, 26(4), pages 478-500.
27. Nowotny, Helga, Peter Scott and Michael Gibbons (2000), Rethinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty (Polity, London).
28. Pavitt, K (2001), "Public policies to support basic research: what can the rest of the world learn form US theory and practice? (and what should they not learn)", Industrial and Corporate Change, 10, pages 761-779.
29. Rose, Steven (2005), "I'll show you mine if ...", The Guardian, 2 June, in James Wilsdon, Brian Wynne and Jack Stilgoe, The Public Value of Science. Or How to Ensure that Science Really Matters (DEMOS Publication, London).
30. Shoret, Peter, Paul Rabinow and Peter Billings (2003), "The changing norms of the life sciences", Nature Biotechnology, 21, February, pages 123-125.
31. Slaughter, Sheila, and Gary Rhoades (1996), "The emergence of a competitiveness research and development policy coalition and the commercialization of academic science and technology", Science, Technology and Human Values, 21(3), pages 303-339.
32. Turner, Steven (1990), "Forms of patronage", in Thomas Gieryn and Susan Cozzens (editors), Theories of Science in Society (Indiana University Press, Bloomington).
33. Waterton, Claire, Brian Wynne, Robin Grove-White and Terry Mansfield (2001), Scientists Reflect on Science: Scientists' Perspectives on Contemporary Science and Environmental Policy (CSEC Report, Lancaster University).
34. Webster, Andrew (1994), "University-corporate ties and the construction of research agendas", Sociology, 28, pages 123-142.
35. Wilsdon, James, Brian Wynne and Jack Stilgoe (2005), The Public Value of Science. Or How to Ensure that Science Really Matters (DEMOS, London).
36. Woolgar, Steve (1988), Science: The Very Idea (Ellis Horwood Press, Chichester).
37. Ziman, John (1994), Prometheus Bound (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).