High-resolution EXAFS of the active site of human sulfite oxidase: Comparison with density functional theory and X-ray crystallographic results

Inorganic Chemistry

Volumn 45, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 493-495

  Harris, Hugh H ^a   George, Graham N ^b   Rajagopalan, K V ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SASKATCHEWAN   (Canada)

^c DUKE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

SULFITE OXIDASE;

ARTICLE; BINDING SITE; CHEMICAL MODEL; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; QUANTUM THEORY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SPECTROSCOPY; X RAY; X RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHY;

BINDING SITES; CRYSTALLOGRAPHY, X-RAY; HUMANS; MODELS, CHEMICAL; QUANTUM THEORY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SPECTRUM ANALYSIS; SULFITE OXIDASE; X-RAYS;

EID: 31544439387     PISSN: 00201669     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ic0512274     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Hille, R. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2002, 27, 360-367.
2. George, G. N.; Pickering, I. J.; Kisker, C. Inorg. Chem. 1999, 38, 2539-2540.
3. Li, H.-K.; Temple, C.; Rajagopalan, K. V.; Schindelin, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 7673-7680.
4. McLeod, R. M.; Farkas, W.; Fridovitch, I.; Handler, P. J. Biol. Chem. 1961, 236, 1841-1852.
5. Cohen, H. L.; Betcher-Lange, S.; Kessler, D. L.; Rajagopalan, K. V. J. Biol. Chem. 1972, 247, 7759-7766.
6. George, G. N.; Garrett, R. M.; Prince, R. C.; Rajagopalan, K. V. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 8588-8592.
7. Garrett, R. M.; Rajagopalan, K. V. J. Biol. Chem 1996, 271, 7387-7391.
8. 6 The oxidized sample was prepared at a final concentration of approximately 1.7 mM in a mixed buffer system consisting of 20 mM Tris, bis-Tris, and bis-Tris propane (pH 9.0) with no added chloride and was frozen in a 10 mm x 10 mm x 3 mm leucite cell. The reduced sample was generated from the oxidized sample by the addition of excess dithionite and trace methylviologen.
9. George, G. N.; Kipke, C. A.; Prince, R. C.; Sunde, R. A.; Enemark, J. H.; Cramer, S. P. Biochemistry 1989, 28, 5075-5080.
10. 2, a three-way split with a bond-length distribution of 0.055 Å.
11. We note that these are arbitrarily chosen examples and that there are many possible solutions.
12. Kisker, C.; Schindelin, H.; Pacheco, A.; Wehbi, W. A.; Garrett, R. M.; Rajagopalan, K. V.; Enemark, J. H.; Rees, D. C. Cell 1997, 91, 973-983.
13. The enzyme used in the XRD study was initially oxidized, but the structure has been assigned to a reduced form because photoreduction of the crystallographic sample is likely as a result of a number of factors.
14. X-ray absorption near-edge spectra are highly sensitive to the electronic structure. We observed no changes in the near-edge spectrum throughout the course of our experiment, indicating that no significant photoreduction occurred.
15. 3 Materials Studio, version 2.1.
16. Delley, B. J. Chem. Phys. 1990, 92, 508-517.
17. Delley, B. J. Chem. Phys. 2000, 113, 7756-7764.
18. -5 Hartree were used, but no vibrational analyses were performed.
19. Becke, A. D. J. Chem. Phys. 1988, 88, 2547-2553.
20. Perdew, J. P.; Wang, Y. Phys. Rev. B 1992, 45, 13244-13249.
21. Scheiner, A. C.; Baker, J.; Andzelm, J. W. J. Comput. Chem. 1997, 18, 775-795.
22. VI and calculations were performed with the appropriate overall charge of 1- for water-bound structures and 2- for hydroxide-bound structures.
23. McNaughton, R. L.; Tipton, A. A.; Rubie, N. D.; Conry, R. R.; Kirk, M. L. Inorg. Chem. 2000, 39, 5697-5706.
24. Hille, R. Chem. Rev. 1996, 96, 2757-2816
25. Aguey-Zinsou, K.-F.; Bernhardt, P. V.; Kappler, U.; McEwan, A. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 530-535.