Retrospective follow-up of transplantation of kidneys from 'marginal' donors

Kidney International

Volumn 69, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 546-552

  Dahmane, D ^a   Audard, V ^a   Hiesse, C ^b,e   Pessione, F ^b   Bentaarit, B ^a   Barrou, B ^c   Rondeau, E ^d   Cohen, S ^b   Lang, P ^a   Grimbert, P ^a  

^a FACULTÉ DE MÉDECINE   (France)

^b Agence de la Biomedecine   (France)

^c PITIÉ SALPÊTRIÈRE HOSPITAL   (France)

^d HÔPITAL TENON   (France)

^e Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Pointe a Pitre   (Guadeloupe)

Author keywords

Graft survival; Kidney transplantation; Marginal donor

Indexed keywords

CREATININE;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ATHEROMA; CONTROLLED STUDY; CREATININE BLOOD LEVEL; CREATININE CLEARANCE; FOLLOW UP; GRAFT SURVIVAL; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMAN; KIDNEY DONOR; KIDNEY FUNCTION; KIDNEY GRAFT; KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION; LONG TERM CARE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; SURVIVAL RATE; SURVIVAL TIME;

ADULT; AGE FACTORS; ATHEROSCLEROSIS; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; CREATININE; DONOR SELECTION; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; GRAFT REJECTION; GRAFT SURVIVAL; HEMODYNAMIC PROCESSES; HUMANS; KIDNEY; KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION; MIDDLE AGED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TISSUE AND ORGAN PROCUREMENT; TISSUE DONORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 31544437469     PISSN: 00852538     EISSN: 15231755     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/sj.ki.5000102     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Gridelli B, Remuzzi G. Strategies for making more organs available for transplantation. N Engl J Med 2000; 343: 404-410.
2. Vivas CA, O'Donovan RM, Jordan ML et al. Cadaveric renal transplantation using kidneys from donors greater than 60 years old. Clin Transplant 1992; 6: 77-82.
3. Belger MA. Changing donor pattern study of cadaveric kidney donors in the UK and Republic of Ireland, 1985-1994. Transplant Proc 1997; 29: 106-107.
4. Alexander JW, Vaughn WK. The use of 'marginal' donors for organ transplantation. The influence of donor age on outcome. Transplantation 1991; 51: 135-141.
5. Rosengard BR, Feng S, Alfrey E et al. Report of the Crystal City meeting to maximize the use of organs recovered from the cadaveric donor. Am J Transplant 2002; 2: 701-711.
6. Port FK, Bragg-Gresham JL, Metzger R et al. Donor characteristics associated with reduced graft survival: an approach to expanding the pool of kidney donors. Transplantation 2002; 74: 1281-1286.
7. United Network for Organ Sharing 2000. Annual Report of the US Scientific Registry for Transplant recipients and the Organ and Transplantation Network. : Richmond, VA, USA, 2000.
8. Ojo AO, Hanson JA, Meier-Kriesche H et al. Survival in recipients of marginal cadaveric donor kidneys compared with other recipients and wait-listed transplant candidates. J Am Soc Nephrol 2001; 12: 589-597.
9. Schnitzler MA, Whiting JF, Brennan DC et al. The expanded criteria donor dilemma in cadaveric renal transplantation. Transplantation 2003; 75: 1940-1945.
10. Hariharan S, Mc Bride MA, Bennett LE, Cohen EP. Risk factors for renal allograft survival form older cadaver donors. Transplantation 1997; 64: 1748-1754.
11. Ciciarelli J, Iwaki Y, Mendez R. The influence of donor age on kidney graft survival in the 1990s. Clin Transplant 1999; 13: 335-340.
12. Ojo AO, Leichtman AB, Punch JD et al. Impact of pre-existing donor hypertension and diabetes mellitus on cadaveric renal transplant outcomes. Am J Kidney Dis 2000; 36: 153-159.
13. Carter JT, Lee CM, Weinstein RJ et al. Evaluation of the older cadaveric donor hypertension and creatinine clearance on graft performance and survival. Transplantation 2000; 70: 765-771.
14. Kuo PC, Johnson LB, Schweitzer EJ et al. Utilization of the older donor for renal transplantation. Am J Surg 1996; 172: 551-555.
15. Lee CM, Scandling JD, Shen GK et al. The kidneys that nobody wanted. Transplantation 1996; 62: 1832-1841.
16. Lee CM, Scandling JD, Pavlakis M et al. A review of the kidneys that nobody wanted. Transplantation 1998; 65: 213-219.
17. Pessione F, Cohen S, Durand D et al. Multivariate analysis of donor risk factors for graft survival in kidney transplantation. Transplantation 2003; 75: 361-367.
18. Rhandawa P. Role of donor kidney biopsies in renal transplantation. Transplantation 2001; 71: 1361-1365.
19. Tullius SG, Volk HD, Neuhaus P. Transplantation of organs from marginal donors. Transplantation 2001; 72: 1341-1349.
20. Cosio FG, Qiu W, Henry ML et al. Factors related to the donor organ are major determinants of renal allograft function and survival. Transplantation 1996; 62: 1571-1576.
21. Alfrey EJ, Lee CM, Scandling JD et al. Expanded criteria for donor kidneys: an update on outcome in single versus dual kidney transplants. Transplant Proc 1997; 29: 3671-3673.
22. Higgins RM, Sheriff R, Bittar AA et al. The quality of function of renal allografts is associated with donor age. Transplant Int 1995; 8: 221-225.
23. Bunnapradist S, Gritsch HA, Peng A et al. Dual kidneys from marginal adult donors as a source for cadaveric renal transplantation in the United States. J Am Soc Nephrol 2003; 14: 1031-1036.
24. Remuzzi G, Grinyo J, Ruggenenti P et al., the double kidney transplant group (DKG). Early experience with dual transplantation in adults using expanded donor criteria. J Am Soc Nephrol 1999; 10: 2591-2598.
25. Andres A, Morales JM, Herrero JC et al. Double versus single allografts from aged donors. Transplantation 2000; 69: 2060-2066.
26. Tullius SG, Reutzel A, Egermann F et al. Contribution of prolonged ischemia and donor age to chronic allograft dysfunction. J Am Soc Nephrol 2000; 11: 1317-1324.
27. De Fijter JW, Mallat MJ, Doxiadis II et al. Increased immunogenicity and cause of graft loss of old donor kidneys. J Am Soc Nephrol 2001; 12: 1538-1541.
28. Schlieper G, Ivens K, Voiculescu A et al. Eurotransplant senior program 'old for old': results form 10 patients. Clin Transplant 2001; 15: 100-1005.
29. Opelz G. Very short ischaemia is not the answer. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2002; 17: 715-716.