The Ethics of Research Involving Animals: A review of the Nuffield Council on Bioethics report from three Rs perspective

Alternatives to Laboratory Animals

Volumn 33, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 659-662

  Hendriksen, Coenraad F M ^a,b  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b NETHERLANDS VACCINE INSTITUTE   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL TESTING ALTERNATIVE; ANIMAL TESTING REDUCTION; ANIMAL TESTING REFINEMENT; ANIMAL TESTING REPLACEMENT; ANIMAL USE; BIOETHICS; EXPERIMENTAL ANIMAL WELFARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESEARCH; REVIEW;

ANIMALIA;

EID: 31444456487     PISSN: 02611929     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/026119290503300604     Document Type: Review

References (6)

1. Nuffield Council on Bioethics (2005). The ethics of research involving animals. XXXVI + 335pp. London, UK: Nuffield Council on Bioethics.
2. Joint Research Centre. (2004). REACH and the need for Intelligent Testing Strategies. Institute for Health and Consumer Protection, European Commission, Joint Research Centre (I), EUR 21554. pp. 1-32.
3. van der Jagt, K., Munn, S., Torslov, J. & de Bruijn, J. (2004). Alternative approaches can reduce the use of test animals under REACH. European Commission, EUR 21405 EN. pp. 1-27.
4. Metz, B., Hendriksen, C.F., Jiskoot, W. & Kersten, G.F. (2002). Reduction of animal use in human vaccine quality control: opportunities and problems. Vaccine 20, 2411-2430.
5. Ren, R., Costantini, F., Gorgacz, E.J., Lee J.J. & Racaniello, V.R. (1990). Transgenic mice expressing a human poliovirus receptor: a new model for poliomyelitis. Cell 63, 353-362.
6. Wood, D. (1999). Neurovirulence. Developments in Biological Standardization 101, 127-129.