A new EPOC in Australian health research

Medical Journal of Australia

Volumn 184, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 4-5

  Gruen, Russell L ^a   Buchan, Heather ^b   Davies, Jan ^b   Mayhew, Alain ^c   Grimshaw, Jeremy M ^c  

^a MENZIES SCHOOL OF HEALTH RESEARCH   (Australia)

^b National Institute of Clinical Studies   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUSTRALIA; CANCER THERAPY; COCHRANE LIBRARY; EDITORIAL; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; HEALTH CARE ACCESS; HEALTH CARE AVAILABILITY; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH SERVICE; HUMAN; LICENSING; MANPOWER; MEDICAL AUDIT; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MEDICAL SPECIALIST; NURSE PRACTITIONER; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PATIENT CARE; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRESCRIPTION; PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE; PROFESSIONAL STANDARD;

EID: 31444443055     PISSN: 0025729X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2006.tb00085.x     Document Type: Editorial

References (4)

1. Clarke M. The Cochrane Collaboration: providing and obtaining the best evidence about the effects of health care. Eval Health Prof 2002; 25: 8-11.
2. Egger M, Smith GD, O'Rourke K. Rationale, potentials, and promise of systematic reviews. In: Egger M, Smith GD, Altman DG, editors. Systematic reviews in health care: meta-analysis in context. 2nd ed. London: BMJ Books, 2001.
3. Lavis JN, Posada FB, Haines A, Osei E. Use of research to inform public policymaking. Lancet 2004; 364: 1615-1621.
4. Bero LA, Eccles M, Grilli R, et al, editors. Effective practice and organisation of care group. About the Cochrane Collaboration (Collaborative Review Groups) 2002, Issue 1. Available at: http://www.epoc.uottawa.ca/ (accessed Nov 2005).