Community tree programs in Illinois, U.S.: A statewide survey and assessment

Journal of Arboriculture

Volumn 29, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 218-224

  Schroeder, Herbert W ^a   Green, Thomas L ^b   Howe, Timothy J ^c  

^a NORTH CENTRAL RESEARCH STATION   (United States)

^b WESTERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Macomb City Forester Macomb   (United States)

Author keywords

Small town; Survey research; Tree ordinance; Tree program; Urban and community forestry

Indexed keywords

EID: 3142777927     PISSN: 02785226     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Dwyer, J. F., E.G. McPherson, H.W. Schroeder, and R.A. Rowntree. 1992. Assessing the benefits and costs of the urban forest. J. Arboric. 18(5):227-234.
2. Dwyer, J. F., H. W. Schroeder, and P. H. Gobster. 1991. The significance of urban trees and forests: Toward a deeper understanding of values. J. Arboric. 17(10):276-284.
3. Getz, D.A., A. Karow, and J.J. Kielbaso. 1982. Inner city preferences for trees and urban forestry programs. J. Arboric. 8(10):258-263.
4. Green, T.L., T.J. Howe, and H.W Schroeder. 1998. Illinois Small Community Tree Programs: Attitudes, Status, and Needs. Final Report of the Illinois Small Community Tree Program Survey. Western Illinois University. Macomb, IL. 166 pp (available on-line at www.na.fs.fed.us/spfo/pubs/ uf/il-treesurvey/frames.htm.).
5. Green, T. L., H.W. Schroeder, and T.J. Howe. 2002. Community Tree Programs in Illinois: Attitudes, Status, and Needs. Final Report of the Illinois Community Tree Program Surveys. Western Illinois University. Macomb, IL 242 pp (available on-line at www.na.fs.fed.us/spfo/ pubs/uf/IL-TreeSurveyLarge/Frames. htm.).
6. Hull, R.B. 1992. How the public values urban forests. J. Arboric. 18(2):89-101.
7. Illinois Department of Conservation. 1981. Report of the Urban Forestry Survey. Illinois Department of Conservation, Division of Forest Resources. Springfield, IL. 21 pp.
8. Kielbaso, J.J., B. Beauchamp, K. Larison, and C. Randall. 1988. Trends in Urban Forestry Management. International City Management Association Baseline Data Report (20) 1. Washington, DC. 17 pp.
9. Miller, R.W 1997. Urban Forestry: Planning and Managing Urban Greenspaces (2nd ed.). Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ. 502 pp.
10. Ricard, R.M. 1994.1994 Urban and Community Forestry Survey Results. University of Cooperative Extension Report. 62 pp.
11. Schroeder, H.W. 1991. The psychological value of trees. The Public Garden 5:17-19.
12. Schroeder, H.W. and W.N. Cannon, Jr. 1983. The esthetic contribution of trees to residential streets in Ohio-towns. J. Arboric. 9(9):237-243.
13. Schroeder, H.W. and S. R. Ruffolo. 1996. Householder evaluations of street trees in a Chicago suburb. J. Arboric. 22(l):35-43.
14. Stewart, C.A. 1988. Urban Forestry Practices in Illinois: Analysis of a Survey. Illinois Council on Forestry Development, Illinois Department of Conservation, Division of Forest Resources, Springfield, IL. 41 pp.
15. Tschantz, B.A., and P.L. Sacamano. 1994. Municipal Tree Management in the United States. Davey Resource Group and Communication Research Associates Report. 72 pp.
16. United States Census Bureau. 2002. Annual Time Series of Population Estimates: Incorporated Places. eire.census.gov/popest/archives/place/placest. php.