Lambertian Correction for Rough and Specular Surfaces

Institute of Mathematics and its Applications Vision, Video, and Graphics 2003, VVG 2003

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 213-220

  Robles Kelly, Antonio ^a   Hancock, Edwin R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INTERACTIVE COMPUTER GRAPHICS; REFLECTION;

GAUSS MAPS; IMAGE DATA; LAMBERTIAN; LAMBERTIAN REFLECTANCE; REFLECTANCE FUNCTIONS; REFLECTANCE MODELING; ROUGH SURFACES; SPECULAR SURFACE; TABULAR REPRESENTATIONS; UNIT SPHERES;

LIGHT SOURCES;

EID: 3142769878     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. S. Nayar and R. Bolle. Reflectance based object recognition. International Journal of Computer Vision, 17(3):219-240, 1996.
2. R. O. Dror, E. H. Adelson, and A. S. Willsky. Recognition of surface reflectance properties from a single image under unknown real-world illumination. In Proc. of the IEEE Worksho on Identifying Objects Across Variations in Lighting, 2001.
3. B. K. P. Horn and M. J. Brooks. The variational approach to shape from shading. CVGIP, 33(2):174-208, 1986.
4. G. Brelstaff and A. Blake. Detecting specular reflection using lambertian constraints. In Int. Conf. on Comp. Vision, pages 297-302, 1988.
5. B. van Ginneken, M. Starvridi, and J. J. Koenderink. Diffuse and specular reflectance from rough surfaces. Applied Optics, 37(1):130-139, 1998.
6. P. Beckmann and A. Spizzochino. The Scattering of Electromagnetic Waves from Rough Surfaces. Pergamon, New York, 1963.
7. C. L. Vernold and J. E. Harvey. A modified beckmann-kirchoff scattering theory for non-paraxial angles. In Scattering and Surface Roughness, number 3426 in Proc. of the SPIE, pages 51-56, 1998.
8. R. L. Cook and K. E. Torrance. A reflectance model for computer graphics. volume 15, pages 307-316, 1981.
9. B. T. Phong. Illumination for computer generated pictures. Communications of the ACM, 18(6):311-317, 1975.
10. C. Schlick. A survey of shading and reflectance models. Computer Graphics Forum, 13(2):121-131, 94.
11. L. B. Wolff. On the relative brightness of specular and diffuse reflection. In Int. Conf. on Comp. Vision and Patt. Recognition, pages 369-376, 1994.
12. S. K. Nayar and M. Oren. Visual appearance of matte surfaces. SCIENCE, 267:1153-1156, 1995.
13. G. J. Ward. Measuring and modeling anisotropic reflection. Computer Graphics, 26(2):265-272, 1992.
14. S. Westin, J. Arvo, and K. Torrance. Predicting reflectance functions from complex surfaces. In SIGGRAPH 92 Conference Proceedings, pages 255-264, 1992.
15. X. He, P. Heynen, R. Phillips, K. Torrance, D. Salesin, and D. Greenberg. A fast and accurate light reflection model. In Siggraph 92 Conference Proceedings, volume 26, pages 253-254, 1992.
16. P. Schröder and W. Sweldens. Spherical wavelets: Efficiently representing functions on the sphere. In Siggraph 95 Conference Proceedings, pages 161-172, 1995.
17. E. P.F. Lafortune, Sing-Choong Foo, K. E. Torrance, and D. P. Greenberg. Non-linear approximation of reflectance functions. In SIGGRAPH 97 Conference Proceedings, pages 117-126, 1997.
18. K. J. Dana and S. K. Nayar. Correlation model for 3d texture. In Int. Conf. on Comp. Vision, pages 1061-1066, 1999.
19. A. Zisserman.and P. Giblin and A. Blake. The information available to a moving observer from specularities. Image and Vision Computing, (7):38-42, 1989.
20. H. Ragheb and E. R. Hancock. Highlight removal using shapefrom- shading. In European Conf. on Comp. Vision, number 2351 in LNCS, pages 626-641, 2002.