The reproducibility of perceptually regulated exercise responses during short-term cycle ergometry

International Journal of Sports Medicine

Volumn 25, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 362-367

  Hartshorn, J E O ^a   Lamb, K L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Exercise prescription; Limits of agreement analysis; Production mode; Rating of perceived exertion (RPE); Reproducibility

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; BICYCLE ERGOMETER; CLINICAL ARTICLE; EXERCISE; FEMALE; HEART RATE VARIABILITY; HUMAN; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; OXYGEN CONSUMPTION; PERCEPTION; RATING SCALE; REPRODUCIBILITY; VALIDATION PROCESS; VOLUNTEER;

ADULT; EXERCISE TEST; EXERTION; FEMALE; HEART RATE; HUMANS; MALE; OXYGEN CONSUMPTION; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 3142768439     PISSN: 01724622     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-2004-815840     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. American College of Sports Medicine. Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription. 6th ed. Baltimore: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, 2000
2. Atkinson G. A comparison of statistical methods for assessing measurement repeatability in ergonomics research. In: Atkinson G, Reilly T (Eds). Sport, Leisure and Ergonomics. London: E & FN Spon, 1995: 218-222
3. Atkinson G, Nevill AM. Statistical methods for addressing measurement error (reliability) in variables relevant to sports medicine. Sports Med 1998; 26: 217-238
4. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; 1: 307-310
5. Bland JM, Altman DG. A note on the use of the intraclass correlation coefficient in the evaluation of agreement between two methods of measurement. Comput Biol Med 1990; 20: 337-340
6. Borg GAV. An Introduction to Borg's RPE Scale. New York: Movement Publications, 1985
7. Borg G. Borg's RPE Scale: A Method for Measuring Perceived Exertion. Stockholm: Borg Perception, 1994
8. Borg G. Borg's Perceived Exertion and Pain Scales. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, 1998
9. British Association of Sport and Exercise Sciences. Physiological Testing Guidelines. 3rd ed. Leeds: British Association of Sport and Exercise Sciences, 1997
10. Buckley JP, Eston RG, Sim J. Ratings of perceived exertion in braille: validity and reliability in production mode. Br J Sports Med 2000; 38: 297-302
11. Cohn JN. Clinical implications of the haemodynamic effects of beta-blockade. Am J Cardiol 1985; 5: 125-128
12. Dunbar CC, Glickman-Weiss EL, Bursztyn DA, Kurtich M, Quiroz A, Conley P. A submaximal treadmill test for developing target ratings of perceived exertion for outpatient cardiac rehabilitation. Percept Mot Skills 1998; 87: 755-759
13. Eston RG, Connolly D. The use of perceived exertion for exercise prescription in patients receiving β-blocker therapy. Sports Med 1996; 21: 176-190
14. Eston RG, Lamb KL. Effort perception. In: Armstrong N, Van Mechelen W (Eds). Pediatric Exercise Science and Medicine. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000: 85-91
15. Eston RG, Parfitt G, Campbell L, Lamb KL. Reliability of effort perception for regulating exercise intensity in children using the Cart and Load Effort Rating (CALER) Scale. Fed Exerc Sci 2000; 12; 388-397
16. Gutman MC, Squires RW, Pollock ML. Perceived exertion-heart rate relationship during exercise testing and training in cardiac patients. J Cardiac Rehabil 1981; 1: 52-59
17. Lamb KL. Test-retest reliability in quantitative physical education research: a commentary. Eur Phys Ed Rev 1998; 4: 145-152
18. Lamb K, Eston RG, Corns D. The reliability of ratings of perceived exertion during progressive treadmill exercise. Br J Sports Med 1999; 33: 336-339
19. Nevill AM, Atkinson G. Assessing agreement between measurements recorded on a ratio scale in sports medicine and sports science. Br J Sports Med 1997; 31: 314-318
20. Noble BJ. Clinical applications of perceived exertion. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1982; 14: 406-411
21. Noble BJ, Robertson RJ. Perceived Exertion. Champaign: Human Kinetics, 1996: 280-285
22. Pollock ML, Wilmore JH, Fox SM. Exercise in Health and Disease: Evaluation and Prescription for Prevention and Rehabilitation. Philadelphia: Saunders, 1984
23. Pollock ML, Jackson AS, Foster C. The use of the perception scale for exercise prescription. In: Borg G, Ottoson D (Eds). Perception of Exertion in Physical Work. London: Macmillan, 1986: 161-178
24. Rankin G, Stokes, M. Reliability of assessment tools in rehabilitation: an illustration of appropriate statistical analyses. Clin Rehabil 1998; 12: 187-199
25. Reilly T, Atkinson G, Waterhouse J. Biological Rhythms and Exercise. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997: 51-53
26. Robertson, RJ. Exercise testing and prescription using RPE as a criterion variable. Int J Sport Psychol 2001; 32: 177-188
27. Thompson J, Lamb KL. The effect of perceptual anchoring on the reliability of exercise regulation in young children. J Sports Sci 2001; 19: 27-28
28. Vincent J. Statistics in Kinesiology. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics Books, 1994: 180
29. Williams JG, Eston RG, Furlong B. CERT: a perceived exertion scale for young children. Percept Mot Skills 1994; 79: 1451-1458