On the principle of minimal relative motion the bar, the circle with a dot, and the ellipse

Journal of Vision

Volumn 3, Issue 10, 2003, Pages 625-629

  Liu, Zili ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Depth; Minimal relative motion; Rigidity; Stereokinesis; Structure from motion

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; COMPUTER ANALYSIS; EYE MOVEMENT; KINETICS; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; VISION; VISUAL ILLUSION; VISUAL STIMULATION; VISUAL SYSTEM;

DEPTH PERCEPTION; HUMANS; MODELS, THEORETICAL; MOTION PERCEPTION; OPTICAL ILLUSIONS; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PERCEPTUAL CLOSURE; ROTATION;

EID: 3142755072     PISSN: 15347362     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/3.10.5     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Beghi, L., Xausa, E., & Zanforlin, M. (1991a). Analytic determination of the depth effect in stereokinetic phenomena without a rigidity assumption. Biological Cybernetics, 65, 425-432.
2. Beghi, L., Xausa, E., De Biasio, C., & Zanforlin, M. (1991b). Quantitative determination of the three-dimensional appearances of a rotating ellipse without a rigidity assumption. Biological Cybernetics, 65, 433-440.
3. Braunstein, M. L., & Andersen, G. J. (1986). Testing the rigidity assumption: a reply to Ullman. Perception, 15, 641-646.
4. Grzywacz, N., & Yuille, A. (1991). Theories for the visual perception of local velocity and coherent motion. In M. Landy and J. A. Movshon (Eds.), Computational models of visual processing. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
5. Heeger, D., & Simoncelli, E. (1991). Model of visual motion sensing. In L. Harris & M. Jenkin (Eds.), Spatial Vision in Humans and Robots. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6. Hildreth, E. (1984). The Measurement of Visual Motion. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
7. Musatti, C. L. (1924). Sui fenomeni stereocinetici. Archivio Italiano di Psicologia, 3, 105-120.
8. Simoncelli, E., & Heeger, D. (1992). A computational model for perception of two-dimensional pattern velocities [Abstract]. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, 33, 954.
9. Ullman, S. (1979). The Interpretation of Structure from Motion. Proceedings of Royal Society of London, B, 203, 405-426.
10. Ullman , S. (1984). Rigidity and misperceived motion. Perception, 13, 219-220.
11. Weiss, Y., Simoncelli, E. P., & Adelson, E. H. (2002). Motion illusions as optimal percepts. Nature Neuroscience, 5, 598-604.
12. Zanforlin, M. (1988). Stereokinetic phenomena as good gestalts. Gestalt Theory, 10, 187-214.
13. Zanforlin, M. (2000). The various appearances of a rotating ellipse and the minimum principle: a review and an experimental test with non-ambiguous percepts. Gestalt Theory, 22, 157-184.