Goal programming-based AHP criteria weight learning algorithm

Qinghua Daxue Xuebao/Journal of Tsinghua University

Volumn 44, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 466-469

  Li, Xin ^a   Liu, Lianchen ^a   Wu, Cheng ^a  

^a TSINGHUA UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Analytic hierarchy process; Computer network; E commerce; Goal programming; Vendor selection

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER NETWORKS; ELECTRONIC COMMERCE; HIERARCHICAL SYSTEMS; STRUCTURED PROGRAMMING; TREES (MATHEMATICS);

ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS; GOAL PROGRAMMING; VENDOR SELECTION;

LEARNING ALGORITHMS;

EID: 3142748136     PISSN: 10000054     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Saaty T L. The Analytic Hierarch Process [M]. New York, McGraw-Hill, 1980.
2. Saaty T L. Modeling unstructured decision problems: a theory of analytical hierarchies [J]. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 1978, 20(3): 147-157.
3. Vargas L G. An overview of the analytic hierarchy process and its applications [J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 1990, 48: 2-8.
4. Byun D H. The AHP approach for selecting an automobile purchase model [J]. Information and Management, 2001, 38(5): 289-297.
5. Badri M A. A combined AHP-GP model for quality control systems [J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2001, 72(1): 27-40.
6. LIU Qian, CHAI Yueting, LI Fangyun. Research on vendor selection in the agile supply chain [A]. Proceedings of the 3rd World Congress on Intelligent Control and Automation [C]. Hefei, 2000. 1038-1942. (in Chinese)
7. Webber S A, Apostolou B, Hassell J M. The sensitivity of the analytic hierarchy process to alternative scale and cue presentations [J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 1997, 96(2): 351-362.
8. Hurley W J. The analytic hierarchy process: a note on an approach to sensitivity which preserves rank order [J]. Computer sand Operations Research, 2001, 28(2): 185-188.
9. Millet I, Saaty T L. On the relativity of relative measures - accommodating both rank preservation and rank reversals in the AHP [J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2000, 121(1): 205-212.
10. Xu Z. On consistency of the weighted geometric mean complex judgment matrix in AHP [J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2000, 126: 683-687.
11. Monsuur H. An intrinsic consistency threshold for reciprocal matrices [J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 1997, 96(2): 387-391.
12. Saaty T L, Hu G. Ranking by eigenvector versus other methods in the analytichierarchy process [J]. Applied Mathematics Letters, 1998, 11(4): 121-125.
13. Escobar M T, Moreno-Jimenez J M. A linkage between the analytic hierarchy process and the compromise programming models [J]. Omega, 2002, 30(5): 359-365.
14. Rosenbloom E S. A probabilistic interpretation of the final rankings in AHP [J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 1997, 96(2): 371-378.
15. Saaty T L. Scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures [J]. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 1977, 15: 234-281
16. LI Yucun, LIU Lianchen, ZHANG Long, et al. Establishment of user management model of cooperation e-commerce platform [J]. Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 2002, 8(3): 169-172. (in Chinese)