Cotton sensitivity to pyrithiobac applied under two irrigation regimes

Journal of Cotton Science

Volumn 7, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 236-241

  Corkern, Christopher B ^a   Reynolds, Daniel B ^b   Griffin, James L ^c   Jordan, David L ^d   Miller, Donnie K ^e   Vidrine, P Roy ^f  

^a LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY AGRICULTURAL CENTER   (United States)

^d NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e Northeast Research Station LSU Agricultural Center   (United States)

^f Louisiana State University at Alexandria   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GOSSYPIUM; GOSSYPIUM HIRSUTUM;

COTTON; CULTIVATION; WATER; WEED CONTROL;

EID: 3142744047     PISSN: 15243303     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Bryson, T.C., C.E. Snipes, and D.R. Shaw. 1991. Effects of DPX-PE350 on weed control and cotton growth and yield. p. 957. In Proc. Beltwide Cotton Conf., San Antonio, TX. 8-13 Jan. 1991. Natl. Cotton Counc. Am., Memphis, TN.
2. Byrd, D.D., Jr. and A.C. York. 1987. Interactions of fluometuron and MSMA with fluazifop and sethoxydim. Weed Sci. 35:270-276.
3. Crowder, S.H., W.H. Mitchell, and C.S. Williams. 1992. DPX-PE350: A ne w cotton herbicide. p. 343. In Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc., 45th, Little Rock, AR, Jan. 20-22, 1992, Southern Weed Science Society, Champaign, IL.
4. Guthrie, D.S. and A.C. York. 1989. Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) development and yield following fluometuron postemergence applied. Weed Technol. 3:501-504.
5. Harrison, M.A., R.M. Hayes, and T.C. Mueller. 1996. Environment affects cotton and velvetleaf response to pyrithiobac. Weed Sci. 44:241-247.
6. Jordan , D.L., M.R. McClelland, and R.E. Frans. 1993. Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) response to DPX-PE350 applied postemergence. Weed Technol. 7:159-162.
7. Keeling, J.W., C.G. Henniger, and J.R. Abernathy. 1993. Effects of DPX-PE350 on cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) growth, yield, and fiber quality. Weed Technol. 7:930-933.
8. Light, G.G., P.A. Dotray, and J.R. Mahan. 1999. Thermal dependence of pyrithiobac efficacy in Amaranthus palmeri. Weed Sci. 47:644-650.
9. Light, G.G., P.A. Dotray, and J.R. Mahan. 2001. A thermal application range for postemergence pyrithiobac applications. Weed Sci. 29:543-548.
10. McIntosh, M.S. 1982. Analysis of combined experiments. Agron. J. 75:153-155.
11. Miller, D.K. and J.L. Griffin. 1993. Soybean (Glycine max) cultivar response to AC 263,222 as influenced by supplemental irrigation. Weed Technol. 7:920-924.
12. Newson, L.J., D.R. Shaw, and D.R. Hydrick. 1992. Cultivar response of soybean to AC 263,222 as influenced by soil moisture. p. 43. In Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc., 45th, Little Rock, AR, Jan. 20-22, 1992, Southern Weed Science Society, Champaign, IL.
13. Shankle, M.W., R.M. Hayes, V.H. Reich, and T.C. Mueller. 1996. MSMA and pyrithiobac effects on cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) development, yield, and quality. Weed Sci. 44:137-142.
14. Smith, M.C., M.R. McClelland, P.C. Carter, C.B. Corkern, and D.B. Reynolds. 1996. Weed control and cotton varietal sensitivity with Staple herbicide. p. 1536-1540. In Proc. Beltwide Cotton Conf., Nashville, TN. 9-12 Jan. 1996. Natl. Cotton Counc. Am., Memphis, TN.
15. Snipes, C.E. and J.D. Byrd, Jr. 1994. The influence of fluometuron and MSMA on cotton yield and fruiting characteristics. Weed Sci. 42:210-215.