A novel approach for direct measurement of the thickness of the liquid-like layer at the ice/solid interface

Journal of Physical Chemistry B

Volumn 108, Issue 26, 2004, Pages 8759-8762

  Kaverin, Alexander ^a   Tsionsky, Vladimir ^a,b   Zagidulin, Dmitrij ^a,c   Daikhin, Leonid ^a   Alengoz, Elena ^a   Gileadi, Eliezer ^a  

^a TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

^b ST PETERSBURG STATE UNIVERSITY   (Russian Federation)

^c UNIVERSITY OF GUELPH   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CRYSTAL RESONATORS; ELECTRIC ADMITTANCE; ELLIPSOMETRY; ICE; INFRARED RADIATION; MAGNETIC RESONANCE; PHOTOELECTRON SPECTROSCOPY; SURFACE PHENOMENA; THERMOSTATS; THICKNESS MEASUREMENT; VISCOELASTICITY;

LIQUID-LIKE LAYERS; QUARTZ CRYSTAL MICROBALANCE (QCM); QUARTZ CRYSTAL RESONATOR; WIRE REGELATION;

PHASE INTERFACES;

EID: 3142736603     PISSN: 15206106     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/jp031299l     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Fletcher, N. H. Philos. Mag. 1968, 18, 1287.
2. Hobbs, P. V. Ice Physics; Clarendon Press: Oxford, 1974.
3. Gilpin, R. R. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 1980, 77, 435.
4. Dash, J. G.; Fu, H. Y.; Wettlaufer, J. S. Rep. Prog. Phys. 1995, 58, 115.
5. Petrenko, V. F.; Whitworth, R. W. Physics of Ice; Oxford University Press: New York, 1999.
6. Beaglehole, D.; Wilson, P. J. Phys. Chem. 1994, 98, 8096.
7. Bluhm, H.; Ogletree, D. F.; Fadley, C. S.; Hussain, Z.; Salmeron, N. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 2002, 14, L 227.
8. Ishizaki, T.; Maruyama, M.; Furukawa, Y.; Dash, J. G. J. Cryst. Growth 1996, 163, 455.
9. Sadtchenko, V.; Ewing, G. E.; Nutt, D. R.; Stone, A. J. Langmuir 2002, 18, 4632.
10. Sadtchenko, V.; Ewing, G. E. J. Chem. Phys. 2002, 116, 4686.
11. Barer, S. S.; Kvlividze, V. I.; Sobolev, V. D.; Churaev, N. V.; Kurzaev, A. B. Dokt. Akad. Nauk SSSR 1977, 235, 601.
12. Barer, S. S.; Churaev, N. V.; Derjaguin, B. V.; Kiseleva, O. A.; Sobolev, V. D. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 1980, 74, 173.
13. Churaev, N. V.; Bardasov, S. A.; Sobolev, V. D. Colloid Surf. A 1993, 79, 11.
14. Pittenger, B.; Fain, S. C.; Coehran, M. J.; Donev, J. M. K.; Robertson, B. E.; Szuchmacher, A.; Overney, R. M. Phys. Rev. B 2001, 63, 4102.
15. Wilen, L. A.; Dash, J. G. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1995, 74, 5076.
16. Tsionsky, V.; Zagidulin, D.; Gileadi, E. J. Phys. Chem. B 2002, 106, 13089.
17. Tsionsky, V.; Daikhin, L.; Zagidulin, D.; Urbakh, M.; Gileadi, E. J. Phys. Chem. B 2003, 107, 12485.
18. Vetter, K. J. Elektrochemische Kinetik; Springer-Verlag: Berlin, Gottingen, Heidelberg, 1961; p 530.
19. Faraday, M. Philos. Mag. 1840, 17, 162.
20. Thompson, J. Proc. R. Soc. 1858, A9, 141.
21. Note that ΔF is the difference between the fundamental frequency of the resonator under given conditions and that of the unloaded resonator, i.e., a resonator having no contact with any viscous medium.
22. 2O (for a LLL in contact with ice) the corresponding point for δΓ (curve 4 in Figure 4c) is marked by an arrow. In this case, the LLL was so thin that vibrations of the resonator were impeded to the point where it become difficult to measure the resonance parameters and all we can state is that δΓ is larger than 70 kHz.