Dehulling capacity and storability of naked oat

Agricultural and Food Science

Volumn 13, Issue 1-2, 2004, Pages 198-211

  Kirkkari, Anna Maija ^a   Peltonen Sainio, Pirjo ^b   Lehtinen, Pekka ^c  

^a Work Efficiency Institute   (Finland)

^b PLANT PRODUCTION RESEARCH   (Finland)

^c AALTO UNIVERSITY   (Finland)

Author keywords

Avena sativa L. Nuda; Combine harvesters; Germination; Grain; Grain moisture; Groat; Hulls; Naked oat; Storage; Threshing

Indexed keywords

AVENA; AVENA NUDA; AVENA SATIVA; MILETINAE; NUDA;

EID: 3142726416     PISSN: 14596067     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2137/1239099041837969     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. Boland, P. & Lawes, D.A. 1973. The inheritance of naked grain character in oats studied in a cross between the naked variety Caesar and the husked variety BO 1/11. Euphytica 22: 582-591.
2. Bonnett, O.T. 1961. The oat plant: Its histology and development. Bulletin 672. University of Illinois, Agricultural Experiment Station. 112 p.
3. Cuddeford, D. 1995. Oats for animal feed. In: Welch, R.W. (ed.). The oat crop, production and utilization. Chapman & Hall, London, UK. p. 321-368.
4. Deane, D. & Commers, E. 1986. Oat cleaning and processing. In: Webster, F.H. (ed.). Oats: chemistry and technology. American Association of Cereal Chemists, St Paul, MN. p. 371-412.
5. Fulcher, R.G. 1986. Morphological and chemical organization of the oat kernel. In: Webster, F.H. (ed.). Oats: chemistry and technology. American Association of Cereal Chemists, St Paul, MN. p. 47-71.
6. Heiniö, R.-L., Lehtinen, P., Oksman-Caldentey, K.-M. & Poutanen, K. 2002. Differences between sensory profiles and development of rancidity during long-term storage of native and processed oat. Cereal Chemistry 79: 367-375.
7. Jenkins, G. 1973. The effect of sowing date and photoperiod on panicle morphology in naked oats. Annals of Applied Biology 73: 85-94.
8. Kangas, A., Salo, Y. & Vuorinen, M. 2001. Paljasjyväisten kauralajikkeiden satoisuus. (The yield of naked oat). In: Kaurasta elinvoimaa. EKT-sarja 1221. Helsinki, Finland. p. 77-83. (In Finnish).
9. Kibite, S. 2002. An isozyme marker linked to the N-1 gene Governing nakedness in oat. Oat Newsletter v. 48. Updated 2 Oct 2002. Cited 1 Apr 2003. Available on the Internet: http://wheat.pw.usda.gov/ggpages/newsletter/v48/ Isozyme.htm
10. Kirkkari, A.-M., Peltonen-Sainio, P. & Rita, H. 2001. Reducing grain damage in naked oat through gentle harvesting. Agricultural and Food Science in Finland 10: 223-229.
11. Lawes, D.A. 1971. Oat improvement - recent research and developments. Field Crop Abstracts 24: 203-215.
12. Lawes, D.A. & Boland, P. 1974. Effect of temperature on the expression of the naked grain character in oats. Euphytica 23: 101-104.
13. Machan, F. 1998. Performance and quality of naked oat cultivars of the world collection, Czech Republik, 1995-1997. Updated 2 Aug 1998. Cited 3 Oct 1999. Available on the Internet: http://wheat.pw.usda.gov/ggpages/oatnewsletter/ oatnews_main.html
14. Ougham, H.J., Lapitova, G. & Valentine, J. 1996. Morphological and biochemical characterization of spikelet development in naked oats (Avena sativa). New Phytologist 134: 5-12.
15. Peltonen-Sainio, P., Kontturi, M., Rajala, A. & Kirkkari, A.-M. 2004. Impact dehulling oat grain to improve quality of on-farm produced feed. I Hullability and associated changes in nutritive value and energy content. Agricultural and Food Science 13: 18-28.
16. Peltonen-Sainio, P., Muurinen, S., Vilppu, M., Rajala, A., Gates, F. & Kirkkari, A.-M. 2001. Germination and grain vigour of naked oat in response to grain moisture at harvest. Journal of Agriculture Science, Cambridge 137: 147-156.
17. Thorton, M.S. 1986. Investigations into the problems associated with the development of naked oats as a crop. PhD. Thesis: University of Wales, Aberystwyth.
18. Valentine, J. 1995. Naked oats. In: Welch, R.W. (ed.). The oat crop, production and utilization. Chapman & Hall, London, UK. p. 504-527.
19. Welch, R.W. 1995. Naked oats. In: Welch, R.W. (ed.). The oat crop, production and utilization. Chapman & Hall, London, UK. p. 279-320.