Majority vote following a debate

Social Choice and Welfare

Volumn 23, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 115-125

  Gilboa, Itzhak ^a,b   Vieille, Nicolas ^c  

^a TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

^b YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c ECOLE POLYTECHNIQUE   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 3142718796     PISSN: 01761714     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00355-003-0243-9     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Aragones E, Gilboa I, Postlewaite A, Schmeidler D (2002) Rhetoric analogies and induction, mimeo
2. Athreya R, Gilboa I, Schmeidler D (2002) Bad examples, mimeo
3. Downs A (1957) An economic theory of democracy. Harper & Row, New York
4. Gilboa I, Schmeidler D (1999) Inductive inference: An axiomatic approach. Mimeo
5. Glazer J, Rubinstein A (2001) Debates and decisions: On a rationale of argumentation rule. Games Econ Behav 36: 158-173
6. Grice HP (1975) Logic and conversation. In: Cole P, Morgan JL (eds) Syntax and semantics, vol. 3: Speech acts. Academic Press, New York, pp 41-58
7. Grice HP (1989) Studies in the way of words. Harvard University Press, Harvard
8. Hollard G, Le Breton M (1996) Logrolling and a McGarvey Theorem for separable tournaments. Soc Choice Welfare 13: 451-455
9. McGarvey DC (1953) A Theorem on the construction of voting paradoxes. Econometrica 21: 608-610
10. Nakamura K (1979) The vetoers in a simple game with ordinal preferences. Int J Game Theory 8: 55-61
11. Vieille N (2002) Random walks and voting theory. Math Oper Res (forthcoming)