Assessing health risk behaviors among adolescents: The effect of question wording and appeals for honesty

Journal of Adolescent Health

Volumn 35, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 91-100

  Brener, Nancy D ^a,c   Grunbaum, Jo Anne ^a   Kann, Laura ^a   Mcmanus, Tim ^a   Ross, Jim ^b  

^a NATIONAL CENTER FOR CHRONIC DISEASE PREVENTION AND HEALTH PROMOTION   (United States)

^b MACRO INTERNATIONAL INC   (United States)

^c CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION   (United States)

Author keywords

Adolescents; Health behavior; Surveys

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CHILD HEALTH; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRUG ABUSE; FEMALE; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; MALE; POPULATION RESEARCH; PREVALENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; RANDOMIZATION; REVIEW; RISK ASSESSMENT; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; STUDENT;

EID: 3142707255     PISSN: 1054139X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1054-139X(03)00339-2     Document Type: Review

References (18)

1. Kann L., Kolbe L.J., Collins J.L. Measuring the health risk behaviors of adolescents The Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System. Public Health Rep. 108:(Suppl 1):1993;2-10
2. Johnston L.D., O'Malley P.M., Bachman J.G. Monitoring the Future national results on adolescent drug use Overview of key findings, 2001. 2002;National Institute on Drug Abuse, Bethesda, MD. NIH Pub. No. 02-5105
3. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Summary of Findings from the 2000 National Household Survey on Drug Abuse. 2001;Office of Applied Studies, Rockville, MD. DHHS Pub. No. (SMA) 01-3549 (NHSDA Series H-13)
4. Grunbaum J.A., Kann L., Kinchen S.A., et al. Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance - United States, 2001. In: MMWR CDC Surveill Summ. 51:(SS-4):2002;1-64
5. Johnston L.D., O'Malley P.M., Bachman J.G. Monitoring the Future national survey results on drug use, 1975-2001. Vol 1 Secondary school students. 2002;National Institute on Drug Abuse, Bethesda, MD
6. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Summary of findings from the 2001 National Household Survey on Drug Abuse: Vol II. Technical appendices and selected data tables. DHHS Pub. No. (SMA) 02-3759 (NHSDA Series H-18):2002;Office of Applied Studies, Rockville, MD
7. Hennessy K., Ginsberg C. Substance use survey data collection methodologies Introduction. J Drug Issues. 31:2001;595-598
8. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. 2000 National Household Survey on Drug Abuse Field Interviewer Manual. 1999;Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Rockville, MD
9. Cowan C.D. Coverage, sample design, and weighting in three federal surveys. J Drug Issues. 31:2001;599-614
10. Fendrich M., Johnson T.P. Examining prevalence differences in three national surveys of youth Impact of consent procedures, mode, and editing rules. J Drug Issues. 31:2001;615-642
11. Fowler F.J., Stringfellow V.L. Learning from experience Estimating teen use of alcohol, cigarettes, and marijuana from three survey protocols. J Drug Issues. 31:2001;643-664
12. Harrison L.D. Understanding the difference in youth drug prevalence rates produced by the MTF, NHSDA, and YRBS studies. J Drug Issues. 31:2001;665-694
13. Sudman S. Examining substance abuse data collection methodologies. J Drug Issues. 31:2001;695-716
14. Gfroerer J., Wright D., Kopstein A. Prevalence of youth substance use The impact of methodological differences between two national surveys. Drug Alcohol Depen. 47:1997;19-30
15. Coggeshall M.B., Kingery P.M. Cross-survey analysis of school violence and disorder. Psychol Schools. 38:2001;107-116
16. Quality Education Data National Education Database. Denver, CO: Quality Education Data, Inc., 2001
17. U.S. Bureau of the Census. School enrollment - social and economic characteristics of students: October 2000 (PPL-148) Available at: www.census.gov/population/www/socdemo/school/ppl-148.html. (Accessed July 5, 2002)
18. Bauer U.E., Johnson T.M. Editing data What difference do consistency checks make? Am J Epidemiol. 151:2000;921-926