A critical guide to Bush v. Gore scholarship

Annual Review of Political Science

Volumn 7, Issue , 2004, Pages 297-313

  Hasen, Richard L ^a  

^a Loyola Law School Los Angeles   (United States)

Author keywords

2000 presidential election; Election law; Supreme Court; Voting technology

Indexed keywords

EID: 3142698550     PISSN: 10942939     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1146/annurev.polisci.6.121901.085832     Document Type: Review

References (78)

1. Abramowicz M, Stearns ML. 2001. Beyond counting votes: the political economy of Bush v. Gore. Vanderbilt Law Rev. 54:1849-1928
2. Ackerman BA, ed. 2002. Bush v. Gore: The Question of Legitimacy. New Haven, CT/London: Yale Univ. Press
3. Alvarez RM, Sinclair DE, Wilson CH. 2004. Counting ballots and the 2000 election: What went wrong? See Crigler et al. 2004, pp. 34-50
4. Ansolabehere SD. 2002. Voting machines, race, and equal protection. Elect. Law J. 1:61-70
5. Ansolabehere SD, Stewart III C. 2004. Voting technology and lost votes in the United States. J. Polit. In press
6. Baker v. Carr, 369 U.S. 186 1962
7. Barstow D, Van Natta D. 2001. How Bush took Florida: mining the overseas absentee vote. New York Times, July 15:A1
8. Bartels LM, Zaller JR. 2001. Al Gore and George Bush's not-so-excellent adventure. PS: Polit. Sci. Polit. Mar. 1:9-20
9. Black v. McGuffage, 209 F. Supp.2d 889 (N.D. Ill 2002)
10. Briffault R. 2001. Bush v. Gore as an equal protection case. Fla. State Univ. Law Rev. 29:325-76
11. Bush v. Gore, 531 U.S. 98 2000
12. California Democratic Party v. Jones, 530 U.S. 567 2000
13. Calmes J, Foldessy EP. 2001. Florida revisited: in election review, Bush wins without Supreme Court help. Wall Street J., Nov. 12:A1
14. Caltech-MTT Voting Technology Project. 2001. Voting - what is, what could be. July 2001 rep. http://vote.caltech.edu/Reports/2001report.html
15. Ceaser JW, Busch AE. 2001. The Perfect Tie: The True Story of the 2000 Presidential Election. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield
16. Chemerinsky E. 2004. Bush v. Gore and Fed-eralism. See Crigler et al. 2004, pp. 91-101
17. Crigler AN, Just MR, McCaffery EJ, eds. 2004. Rethinking the Vote: The Politics and Prospects of American Election Reform. New York: Oxford Univ. Press
18. Dershowitz AM. 2001. Supreme Injustice : How the High Court Hijacked Election 2000. New York: Oxford Univ. Press
19. Downie L, ed. 2001. Deadlock: The Inside Story of America's Closest Election. New York: PublicAffairs
20. Dworkin R. 2002a. Introduction. See Dworkin 2002b, pp. 1-55
21. Dworkin R, ed. 2002b. A Badly Flawed Election: Debating Bush v. Gore, the Supreme Court, and American Democracy. New York: New
22. Elhauge E. 2001. The lessons of Florida 2000. Policy Rev. Dec. 1:15-36
23. Ely JH. 1980. Democracy and Distrust: A Theory of Judicial Review. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
24. Epstein RA. 2001. "In such manner as the legislature thereof may direct:" the outcome in Bush v Gore defended. See Sunstein & Epstein 2001, pp. 13-37
25. Fried C. 2002. An unreasonable reaction to a reasonable decision. In Bush v. Gore: The Question of Legitimacy, ed. BA Ackerman, pp. 3-19. New Haven, CT/London: Yale Univ. Press
26. Garrett E. 2001. Leaving the decision to Congress. See Sunstein & Epstein 2001, pp. 38-54
27. Gibson JL, Caldeira GA, Spence LK. 2003. The Supreme Court and the US presidential election of 2000: wounds, self-inflicted or otherwise? Br. J. Polit. Sci. 33:535-56
28. Gillman H. 2001. The Votes That Counted: How the Court Decided the 2000 Presidential Election. Chicago/London: Univ. Chicago Press
29. Gore v. Harris, 772 So.2d 1243 (Fla. 2000)
30. Greene A. 2001. Understanding the 2000 Election: A Guide to the Legal Battles That Decided the Presidency. New York/London: New York Univ. Press
31. Harper v. Virginia State Board of Elections, 383 U.S. 663 1966
32. Hasen RL. 2001 a. Bush v. Gore and the future of equal protection law in elections. Fla. State Univ. Law Rev. 29:377-406
33. Hasen RL. 2001b. A "tincture of justice:" Judge Posner's failed rehabilitation of Bush v. Gore. Texas Law Rev. 80:137-54
34. Hasen RL. 2003. The Supreme Court and Election Law: Judging Equality from Baker v. Carr to Bush v. Gore. New York: New York Univ. Press
35. Hasen RL. 2004. After the storm: the uses, normative implications, and unintended consequences of voting reform research in post Bush v. Gore equal protection challenges. See Crigler et al. 2004, pp. 185-99
36. Herron MC, Sekhon JS. 2004. Black candidates and black voters: assessing the impact of candidate race on uncounted vote rates. J. Polit. In press
37. Issacharoff S. 2001. Political judgments. See Sunstein & Epstein 2001, pp. 55-76
38. Issacharoff S, Karlan PS, Pildes RH, eds. 2001. When Elections Go Bad: The Law of Democracy and the Presidential Election of 2000. New York: Foundation. 2nd ed.
39. Issacharoff S, Pildes RH. 1998. Politics as markets: partisan lockups of the democratic process. Stanford Law Rev. 50:643-717
40. Jacobson AJ, Rosenfeld M. 2002. The Longest Night: Polemics and Perspectives on Election 2000. Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
41. Karlan PS. 2001. The newest equal protection: regressive doctrine on a changeable court. See Sunstein & Epstein 2001, pp. 77-97
42. Keating D, Balz D. 2001. Florida recounts would have favored Bush; but study finds Gore might have won statewide tally of all uncounted ballots. Washington Post, Nov. 12:A1
43. Kramer LD. 2001. The Supreme Court in politics. In The Unfinished Election of 2000, ed. JN Rakove, pp. 105-157. New York: Basic Books
44. Krent HJ. 2001. Judging judging: the problem of second-guessing state judges' interpretation of state law in Bush v. Gore. Fla. State Univ. Law Rev. 29:493-534
45. Krosnick JA, Miller JM, Tichy MR 2004. An unrecognized need for ballot reform: the effects of candidate name order on election outcomes. See Crigler et al. 2004, pp. 51-74
46. Lowenstein DH, Hasen RL. 2001. Election Law: Cases and Materials. Durham, NC: Carolina Acad. 2nd ed.
47. Lund N. 2002. The unbearable lightness of Bush v. Gore. Cardozo Law Rev. 23:1219-79
48. Marshall WP. 2001. The Supreme Court, Bush v. Gore, and rough justice. Fla. State Univ. Law Rev. 29:787-809
49. McConnell MW. 2001. Two-and-a-half cheers for Bush v. Gore. See Sunstein & Epstein 2001, pp. 98-122
50. Merzer M, ed. 2001. The Miami Herald Report: Democracy Held Hostage. New York: St. Martin's
51. Miller v. Johnson, 515 U.S. 900 1995
52. Mulroy SJ. 2002. Lemonade from lemons: Can advocates convert Bush v. Gore into a vehicle for reform? Georgetown J. Poverty Law Policy 9:357-77
53. NORC Florida Ballot Project. 2001. http://www.norc.uchicago.edu/fl/index. asp
54. Palm Beach County Canvassing Board v. Harris, 772 So.2d 1220 (FL 2000) (decision vacated by Bush v. Palm Beach County Canvassing Bd., 531 U.S. 70 2000)
55. Pildes RH. 2001. Democracy and disorder. See Sunstein & Epstein 2001, pp. 140-64
56. Pildes RH. 2002. Constitutionalizing democratic politics. See Dworkin 2002b, pp. 155-86
57. Polsby NW. 2002. Holy cow! Preliminary reflections on the 2000 election. See Dworkin 2002b, pp. 265-83
58. Posner RA. 2001a. Florida 2000: a legal and statistical analysis of the election deadlock and the ensuing litigation. Supreme Court Rev. 2000:1-60
59. Posner RA. 2001b. Breaking the Deadlock: The 2000 Election, the Constitution, and the Courts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
60. Pushaw RJ. 2001. Bush v. Gore: looking at Baker v. Carr in a conservative mirror. Const. Comment. 18:359-402
61. Radin MJ. 2002. Can the rule of law survive Bush v. Gore? See Ackerman 2002, pp. 110-25
62. Raskin JB. 2003. Overruling Democracy: The Supreme Court vs, the American People. New York: Routledge
63. Reynolds v. Sims, 377 U.S. 533 1964
64. Saltman RG. 1975. Effective use of computing technology in vote-tallying. Natl. Bur. Standards NBSIR 75-687, March
65. Schotland RA. 2002. In Bush v. Gore: Whatever happened to the due process ground? Loyola Univ. Chicago Law J. 34:211-43
66. Schwartz PM. 2002. Voting technology and democracy. NY Univ. Law Rev. 77:625-98
67. Shaw v. Reno, 509 U.S. 630 1993
68. Smith HH. 2001. History of the Article II independent state legislature doctrine. Fla. State Univ. Law Rev. 29:731-84
69. Southwest Voter Registration Educ. Project v. Shelley, 344 F.3d. 882 (9th Cir. 2003) (decision vacated by 344 F.3d 914)
70. Sunstein CR. 2001a. Introduction: of law and politics. See Sunstein & Epstein 2001, pp. 1-12
71. Sunstein CR. 2001b. Order without law. See Sunstein & Epstein 2001, pp. 205-22
72. Sunstein CR, Epstein RA, eds. 2001. The Vote: Bush, Gore, and the Supreme Court. Chicago/London: Univ. Chicago Press
73. Tomz M, Van Houweling RP. 2003. How does voting equipment affect the racial gap in voided ballots? Am. J. Polit. Sci. 47:46-60
74. Tribe LH. 2002. Freeing eroG v. hsuB from its hall of mirrors. See Dworkin 2002b, pp. 105-54
75. Wand JN, Shotts KW, Sekhon JS, Mebane WR, Brady HE. 2001. The butterfly did it: the aberrant vote for Buchanan in Palm Beach County, Florida. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 95:693-810
76. Wesberry v. Sanders, 376 U.S. 1 1964
77. Wright JW, ed. 2001. 36 Days: The Complete Chronicle of the 2000 Presidential Election Crisis. New York: Times Books
78. Yoo JC. 2001. In defense of the Court's legitimacy. See Sunstein & Epstein 2001, pp. 223-40