Calibration of incomplete demand systems in quantitative analysis

Applied Economics

Volumn 36, Issue 8, 2004, Pages 839-847

  Beghin, John C ^a,b   Bureau, Jean Christophe ^c   Drogué, Sophie ^c  

^a IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b INRA   (France)

^c AGROPARISTECH   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CALIBRATION; CONSUMPTION BEHAVIOR; DEMAND ANALYSIS; FOOD CONSUMPTION; METHODOLOGY;

ASIA; EURASIA; FAR EAST; KOREA;

EID: 3142694212     PISSN: 00036846     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0003684042000229550     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Baltas, G. (2002) An applied analysis of brand demand structure, Applied Economics, 34, 1171-5.
2. Beghin, J. C., Bureau, J.-C. and Park, S. J. (2002) Food Security and Agricultural Protection in South Korea, Working paper (revised September 2002), Department of Economics, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa. (Available at http://www. econ.iastate.edu/research).
3. Deaton, A. and Muellbauer, J. (1980) An almost ideal demand system, American Economic Review, 70, 312-26.
4. Fang, C. and Beghin, J. C. (2002) Urban demand for edible oils and fats in China. Evidence from Household Survey data, Journal of Comparative Economics, 30, 1-22.
5. Keller, W. J. (1984) Some simple but flexible differential consumer demand systems, Economics Letters, 16, 77-82.
6. Lacaux, P. and Théodor, R. (1986) Analyse Numérique Matricielle Appliquée à l'Art de L'Ingénieur, Vol. 1, Masson P, Paris.
7. LaFrance, J. T. (1985) Linear demand functions in theory and practice, Journal of Economic Theory, 37, 147-66.
8. LaFrance, J. T. (1998) The LINQUAD incomplete demand model, Working Paper, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of California, Berkeley.
9. LaFrance, J. T., Beatty, T. K. M., Pope, R. D. and Agnew, G. K. (2002) The U.S. distribution of income and Gorman Engel curves for food, Journal of Econometrics, 107, 235-57.
10. LaFrance, J. T. and Hanemann, W. M. (1989) The dual structure of incomplete demand systems, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 71, 262-74.
11. Lau, L. J. (1978) Testing and imposing monotonicity, convexity, and quasi-convexity constraints, in Production Economics: A Dual Approach to Theory and Applications (Eds) M. Fuss and D. McFadden, North-Holland, Amsterdam, Appendix A4.
12. Moschini, G. (1999) Specification of the demand structure of national models and welfare calculations, Memorandum prepared for the USDA-WTO Project, February, Ames, Iowa.
13. Moschini, G. (2001) A flexible multistage demand system based on indirect separability, Southern Economic Journal, 68(1), 22-41.
14. OECD (2000) A Matrix Approach to Evaluation Policy: Preliminary Findings from the PEM pilot Studies of Crop Policy in the EU, The US, Canada and Mexico, Document COM/AGR/CA/TD/TC/(99)117, March, Paris.
15. Roningen, V., Sullivan, J. and Dixit, P. (1991) Documentation of the Static World Policy Simulation (SWOPSIM) Modeling Framework, USDA/ATAD/ERS, Washington, DC, September.
16. Selvanathan, E. A. (1985) An even simpler differential demand system, Economics Letters, 19, 343-7.