Molecular dynamics simulations of surface tensions of aqueous electrolytic solutions

Journal of Physical Chemistry B

Volumn 108, Issue 26, 2004, Pages 9077-9084

  Bhatt, Divesh ^a   Newman, John ^a   Radke, C J ^a  

^a University of California   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BOLTZMANN DISTRIBUTION; DIELECTRIC CONTINUUM; ELECTROSTATIC POTENTIAL; GIBBS ADSORPTION EQUATION;

APPROXIMATION THEORY; BOUNDARY CONDITIONS; CARRIER CONCENTRATION; DIFFUSION; ELECTROLYTES; HYDROPHOBICITY; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PERMITTIVITY; SOLUTIONS; SOLVENTS; SURFACE TENSION; THERMODYNAMICS;

MOLECULAR DYNAMICS;

EID: 3142692651     PISSN: 15206106     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/jp037212d     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Washburn, E. W. International Critical Tables of Numerical Data. Physics, Chemistry, and Technology; McGraw-Hill: New York, 1928; Vol. IV.
2. Onsager, L.; Samaras, N. N. T. J. Chem. Phys. 1934, 2, 528.
3. Bhuiyan, L. B.; Bratko, D.; Outhwaite, C. W. J. Phys. Chem. 1991, 95, 336.
4. Bostrom, M.; Williams, D. R. M.; Ninham, B. W. Langmuir 2001, 17, 4475.
5. Karraker, K. A.; Radke, C. J. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2002, 96, 231.
6. Manciu, M.; Ruckenstein, E. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2003, 705, 63.
7. Collins, K. D.; Washabaugh, M. W. Q. Rev. Biophys. 1985, 18, 323.
8. Newman, J. Electrochemical Systems; Prentice Hall: New York, 1991; Chapter 7.
9. Hummer, G.; Pratt, L. R.; Garcia, A. E. J. Phys. Chem. 1996, 100, 1206.
10. Garde, S.; Hummer, G.; Paulaitis, M. E. J. Chem. Phys. 1998, 108, 1552.
11. Heinzinger, K.; Bopp, P.; Jancso, G. Acta Chim. Hung. 1985, 121, 27.
12. Schafer, K.; Masia, A. P.; Juntgen, H. Z. Elektrochem. 1955, 59, 425.
13. Wagman, D. J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 1982, 11 (supplement 2).
14. Berendsen, H. J. C.; Grigera, J. R.; Straatsma, T. P. J. Phys. Chem. 1987, 91, 6269.
15. Wheeler, D. R. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of California, Berkeley, 2002.
16. Heinzinger, K. Physica 1985, 131B, 196.
17. Nose, S. Mol. Phys. 1984, 52, 255.
18. Hoover, W. G. Phys. Rev. A 1985, 31, 1695.
19. Frenkel, D.; Smit, B. Understanding Molecular Simulations; Academic Press: New York, 1991; Chapter 6.
20. Allen, M. P.; Tildesley, D. J. Computer Simulation of Liquids; Clarendon Press: Oxford, 1987; Chapter 7.
21. de Leeuw, S. W.; Perram, J. W.; Smith, E. R. Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 1980, 373, 27.
22. Karasawa, N.; Goddard, W. A. J. Phys. Chem. 1989, 93, 7320.
23. Wheeler, D. R.; Rowley, R. L. Mol. Phys. 1998, 94, 555.
24. Bhatt, D.; Newman, J.; Radke, C. J. J. Phys. Chem. B 2003, 107, 13076.
25. Alejandre, J.; Tildesley, D. J.; Chapela, G. A. J. Chem. Phys. 1995, 102, 4574.
26. Irving, J. H.; Kirkwood, J. G. J. Chem. Phys. 1950, 18, 817.
27. Walton, J. P. R. B.; Tildesley, D. J.; Rowlinson, J. S. Mol. Phys. 1983, 48, 1357.
28. Nose, S.; Klein, M. L. Mol. Phys. 1983, 50, 1055.
29. Huang, D. M.; Geissler, P. L.; Chandler, D. J. Phys. Chem. B 2001, 105, 6704.
30. Kalra, A.; Tugcu, N.; Cramer, S. M.; Garde, S. J. Phys. Chem. B 2001, 105, 6380.
31. Jungwirth, P.; Tobias, D. J. J. Phys. Chem. B 2001, 105, 10468.
32. Wilson, M. A.; Pohorille, A.; Pratt, L. R. Chem. Phys. 1989, 129, 209.
33. Marrink, S.-J.; Mareelja, S. Langmuir 2001, 17, 7929.
34. 1 For NaF, experimental results are available up to only about 0.5 M; the dashed line is mainly an extrapolation. Moreover, as mentioned in the Introduction, any comparison between MD specific Na"F" solution and experimental NaF solution is not to be taken quantitatively.
35. Daiguji, H.; Hihara, E. Heat Mass Transfer 1999, 35, 213.
36. Jackson, J. D. Classical Electrodynamics; John Wiley and Sons: New York, 1999; Chapter 4.
37. Yeh, I.-C.; Berkowitz, M. L. J. Chem. Phys. 1999, 111, 3155.
38. de Leeuw, S. W.; Perram, J. W. Mol. Phys. 1979, 37, 1313.
39. Yang, P.-K.; Liaw, S.-H.; Lim, C. J. Phys. Chem. B 2002, 106, 2973.
40. Svensson, B. R.; Woodward, C. E. Mol. Phys. 1988, 64, 247.