Global media and politics: Transnational communication regimes and civic cultures

Annual Review of Political Science

Volumn 7, Issue , 2004, Pages 125-148

  Bennett, W Lance ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

Citizen information; Media and democracy; Media markets; Media ownership; National media systems

Indexed keywords

EID: 3142666265     PISSN: 10942939     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1146/annurev.polisci.7.012003.104804     Document Type: Review

References (74)

1. Bagdikian B. 1997. The Media Monopoly. Boston: Beacon. 5th ed.
2. Baum M. 2002. Sex, lies and war: how soft news brings foreign policy to the inattentive public. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 96(2):91-109
3. Bennett WL. 1998. The uncivic culture: communication, identity and the rise of lifestyle politics. P.S. Polit. Sci. Polit. 31:741-61
4. Bennett WL. 2003a. Communicating global activism: strengths and vulnerabilities of networked politics. Inf. Commun. Soc. 6(2): 143-68
5. Bennett WL. 2003b. News: The Politics of Illusion. New York: Longman. 5th ed.
6. Bennett WL. 2004. The twilight of mass media news. In Freeing the Press, ed. T Cook. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State Univ. Press. In press
7. Bennett WL, Entman RM, eds. 2001. Mediated Politics: Communication in the Future of Democracy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
8. Blumler J, Kavanagh D. 1999. The third age of political communication: influences and features. Polit. Commun. 16:209-30
9. Bourdieu P. 1996. On Television. New York: W.W. Norton
10. Bourdieu P. 2002. Some questions for the true masters of the world. Berkeley J. Sociol. 46:170-76
11. Brants K. 1998. Who's afraid of infotainment? Eur. J. Commun. 8:104-21
12. Cappella J, Jamieson KH. 1997. The Spiral of Cynicism: The Press and the Public Good. New York: Oxford Univ. Press
13. Carnoy M, Castells M, Cohen SS, Cardozo FH. 1993. The New Global Economy in the Information Age. University Park: Penn. State Univ. Press
14. Castells M. 1997. The Power of Identity. Oxford, UK: Blackwell
15. Cole J. 2003. Surveying the Digital Future. UCLA Internet Report. Year Three. UCLA Cent. Commun. Policy
16. Compaigne B, Gomery D. 2000. Who Owns the Media? Competition and Concentration in the Mass Media Industry. Mahwah, NJ: Laurence Erlbaum. 3rd ed.
17. Cook T. 1998. Governing with the News. Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
18. Dahlgren P. 1995. Television and the Public Sphere. London: Sage
19. Davis R. 1999. The Web of Politics: The Internet's Impact on the American Political System. New York: Oxford Univ. Press
20. Economist. 2002. Special report: media conglomerates. 363:67-69
21. Entman RM. 1989. Democracy Without Citizens: Media and the Decay of American Politics. Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
22. Esser R 1999. Tabloidization of news: a comparative analysis of Anglo-American and German press journalism. Eur. J. Commun. 14(3):291-324
23. Falk R. 1997. Resisting 'globalisation-from-above' through 'globalisation-from-below.' New Polit. Econ. 2(1): 11-25
24. Ferguson K. 1998. World information Sows and the impact of new technology: Is there a need for international communications policy and regulation? Soc. Sci. Comput. Rev. 16(3):252-67
25. Ferguson T, Rogers J. 1981. The Reagan victory: corporate coalitions in the 1980 campaign. In The Hidden Election: Politics and Economics in the 1980 Presidential Campaign, ed. T Ferguson, J Rogers, pp. 1-27. New York: Pantheon
26. Freeman LA. 2000. Closing the Shop: Information Cartels and Japan's Mass Media. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
27. Friedland J. 1994. Hard news. Far East. Econ. Rev. March 10:44-46
28. Garnham N. 1992. The media and the public sphere. In Habermas and the Public Sphere, ed. C Calhoun, pp. 359-76. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
29. Giddens A. 1991. Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in Late Modern Age. Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press
30. Graber DA. 2001. Processing Politics: Learning from Television in the Internet Age. Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
31. Graber DA, Bimber B, Bennett WL, Davis R, Norris P. 2004. The Internet and politics: emerging perspectives. In The Internet and the Academy, ed. M. Price, H. Nissenbaum, New York: Peter Lang Publishing. In press
32. Gunther R, Mughan A. 2000. The political impact of the media: a reassessment. In Democracy and the Media: A Comparative Perspective, ed. R Gunther, A Mughan, pp. 402-48. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
33. Hanson J. 1997. Winning the hearts and minds of TV viewers in Japan. Journal August:23-28
34. Herman E, McChesney R. 1997. The Global Media: The New Visionaries of Corporate Capitalism. London: Cassell
35. Hertz N. 2001. The Silent Takeover: Global Capitalism and the Dream of Democracy. New York: Free
36. Hughes S, Lawson C. 2003. Propaganda and crony capitalism: partisan bias in Mexican television news. Presented at Annu. Meet. Int. Commun. Assoc., May 24-27, San Diego, CA
37. Inglehart R. 1997. Modernization and Postmodernization: Cultural, Economic, and Political Change in 43 Societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
38. Jordan K, Hauser K, Foster S. 2003. The augmented social network: building identity and trust into the next generation internet. Rep. for Link Tank presented at PlaNetWork conference, San Francisco, CA, June 3. http:// collaboratory.planetwork.net/linktank_whitepaper/ASN2003-05-15.pdf
39. Katzenstein PJ, ed. 1996. The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics. New York: Columbia Univ. Press
40. Keck M, Sikkink K. 1998. Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. New York: Cornell Univ. Press
41. Knight G. 1989. Reality effects: tabloid television news. Queen's Q. 96(1):94-108
42. Kuhn R. 1995. The Media in France. London: Routledge
43. Lang S. 2004. The state of local politics: media and political communication in the age of glocalization. In Political Communication in International Perspective., ed. W Esser, B Pfetsch. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press. In press
44. Mazzoleni G. 1995. Towards a 'videocracy?' Italian political communication at a turning point. Eur. J. Commun. 10(3):291-319
45. McChesney R. 1999. Rich Media, Poor Democracy: Communication Politics in Dubious Times. Urbana: Univ. Ill. Press
46. McChesney R. 2001. Global media, neoliberalism, and imperialism. Mon. Rev. 52(10):1-19. http://www.monthlyreview.org/301rwm.htm
47. Murdock G. 1990. Redrawing the map of the communications industries: concentration and ownership in the era of privatization. In Public Communication: The New Imperatives, ed. M Ferguson, pp. 1-15. Beverly Hills: Sage
48. Norris P. 2000. A Virtuous Circle: Political Communication in Postindustrial Societies. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
49. Ó Siochrú B, Girard B, Mahan A. 2002. Global Media Governance. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield
50. Patterson TE. 1993. Out of Order. New York: Knopf
51. Patterson TE. 2000. Doing well and doing good: how soft news and critical journalism are shrinking the news audience and weakening democracy - and what new outlets can do about it. KSG Work. Pap. Ser. RWP01-001. Joan Shorenstein Cent. Press, Polit., Public Policy, Kennedy School Gov., Harvard Univ.
52. Pew Research Center. 2003. Global Attitudes Project: Views of a Changing World. Washington, DC: Pew Res. Cent, for People and Press
53. Pool I de S. 1983. Technologies of Freedom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
54. Pool I de S. 1990. Technologies Without Boundaries: On Telecommunication in a Global Age. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
55. Price ME. 1996. Television, the Public Sphere and National Identity, Oxford, UK: Clarendon
56. Putnam R. 1988. Diplomacy and domestic politics: the logic of two-level games. Int. Org. 42(3):427-60
57. Putnam R. 2000. Bowling Alone. New York: Simon & Schuster
58. Rahn WM, Rudolph TM. 2001. National identities and the future of democracy. See Bennett & Entman 2001, pp. 453-67
59. Rheingold H. 2002. Smart Mobs: The Next Social Revolution. New York: Perseus
60. Rosenstiel T, Gottlieb C, Brady LA. 2000. Time of peril for TV news: quality sells, but commitment - and viewership - continue to fade. Columbia Journal. Rev. Nov./Dec.:84-92
61. Schiller H. 1996. Informational Inequality: The Deepening Social Crisis in America. London: Routledge
62. Schudson M. 1998. The Good Citizen: A History of American Civic Life. New York: Free
63. Sender H. 1994. Image problems: Japan's public broadcaster faces an uncertain future. Far East. Econ. Rev. Oct. 6:80-81
64. Sikkink K. 2003. Beyond the boomerang: transnational networks and the dynamic interaction of domestic and international opportunity structures. Presented at Conf. "Transnational Processes and Social Movements," July 22-26, Villa Serbelloni, Bellagio, Italy
65. Sinclair J, Cunningham S, Jacka E. 1996. New Patterns in Global Television: Peripheral Vision. Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
66. Smith A. 1991. The Age of Behemoths: The Globalization of Mass Media Firms. New York: Priority/Twentieth Century Fund
67. Sparks C. 2001. The internet and the global public sphere. See Bennett & Entman 2001, pp. 75-98
68. Sparks C, Tulloch J. 2000. Tabloid Tales: Global Debates Over Media Standards. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield
69. Stevenson N. 2000. The future of public media cultures: cosmopolitan democracy and ambivalence. Inf. Commun. Soc. 3(2):192-214
70. Stratham P. 1996. Television news and the public sphere in Italy. Eur. J. Commun. 11:511-56
71. Thomson JE. 1990. State practices, international norms, and the decline of mercenarism. Int. Stud. Q. 34(1):23-47
72. Thussu DK. 1997. Globalisation of the 'infotainment' industry. Third World Q. 18(2):391-96
73. World Social Forum. 2003. http://www.forumsocialmundial.org.br/main.asp? id_menu=19&cd_language=2
74. Zaller J. 2003. A new standard of news quality: burglar alarms for the monitorial citizen. Polit. Commun. 20:109-30