Understanding in the shape understanding system

International Journal of Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence

Volumn 18, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 727-745

  Les, Zbigniew ^a   Les, Magdalena ^a  

^a Qu Jadwiga Res Inst Understanding   (Australia)

Author keywords

Intelligence test; Shape understanding; Visual concept; Visual reasoning

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE PROCESSING; LEARNING SYSTEMS; NEURAL NETWORKS; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHYSIOLOGY; SEMANTICS; VISION; VISUALIZATION;

INTELLIGENCE TESTS; PICTOGRAPHIC IMAGES; SHAPE UNDERSTANDING SYSTEMS; VISUAL CONCEPTS; VISUAL REASONING;

OBJECT RECOGNITION;

EID: 3142661017     PISSN: 02180014     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1142/S0218001404003356     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. P. Attneave, Some informational aspects of visual perception, Psychol. Rev. 61 (1954) 183-193.
2. J. Bala and H. Wechsler, Shape analysis using genetic algorithms, Patt. Recogn. Lett. 14 (1993) 965-973.
3. J. Bala and H. Wechsler, Shape analysis using hybrid learning, Patt. Recogn. 29(8) (1996) 1323-1333.
4. R. Barthes, The Challenge of Semiotics (University of California Press, Berkeley, 1994).
5. P. J. Besl and R. C. Jain, Three-dimensional object recognition, Comput. Surv. 17(1) (1985) 75-154.
6. B. Bhanu and O. D. Faugeras, Shape matching of two-dimensional objects, IEEE Trans. Patt. Anal. Mach. Intell. 6(2) (1984) 137-156.
7. I. Biederman, Recognition by components: a theory of human image understanding, Psychol. Rev. 94 (1987) 115-147.
8. T. O. Binford, Survey of model-based image analysis system, Int. J. Robot. Res. 1(1) (1982) 18-64.
9. C. K. Bliss, Semantography (Blissymbolics) (Semantography, Blissymbolics, Publication, Sydney, 1963).
10. R. T. Chin and C. R. Dyer, Model-based recognition in robot vision, Comput. Surv. 18(1) (1986) 67-108.
11. J. Culler, The Pursuit of Signs: Semiotics, Literature, Deconstruction (Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, 1981).
12. A. Frutiger, Signs and Symbols: Their Design and Meaning (Van Nostrand Reinhold, NY, 1989).
13. J. J. Gibson, The Perception of the Visual World (Houghton, 1950).
14. Y. He and A. Kundu, 2-D shape classification using hidden Markov model, IEEE Trans. Patt. Anal. Mach. Intell. 13(11) (1991) 1172-1184.
15. W. Horton, The Icon Book. Visual Symbols for Computer System and Documentation (John Wiley, NY, 1994).
16. J. Hummel and I. Biederman, Dynamic binding in neural network for shape recognition, Psychol. Rev. 99 (1992) 480-517.
17. B. Kartikeayan and A. Sarkar, Shape description by time series, IEEE Trans. Patt. Anal. Mach. Intell. 11(9) (1989) 977-984.
18. W. Koehler, Gestalt Psychology (Liverlight, 1929).
19. J. Koenderink, The structure of images, Biol. Cybern. 50 (1984) 363-370.
20. J. Koenderink, Dynamic shape, Biol. Cybern. 53 (1986) 383-396.
21. K. Koffka, Principles of Gestalt Psychology (Harcourt Brace, Jovanovic, 1935).
22. Z. Les, An aesthetic evaluation method based on image understanding approach, in First Int. Conf. Visual Information Systems VISUAL'96, Melbourne, 1996.
23. Z. Les, The processing method as a set of image transformations in shape understanding, Int. J. Comput. Graph. 25 (2001) 223-233.
24. Z. Les, Shape understanding. Possible classes of shapes, Int. J. Shape Model. 7(1) (2001) 75-109.
25. Z. Les, Shape understanding system: understanding the thin object, Int. J. Comput. Graph. 26(6) (2002) 951-970.
26. Z. Les and M. Les, System of experts to perform an epistemological task of shape understanding, in IASTED Int. Conf. Software Engineering, 2000, Las Vegas.
27. Z. Les and M. Les, Understanding as a new paradigm in the design of the intelligent systems in automotive and transportation technology, in Automotive and Transportation Technology International Conf., ATT, 2001, Barcelona.
28. Z. Les and M. Les, Shape understanding system: application of fuzzy sets, neural networks and statistical methods in the process of visual thinking, in 10th IEEE Conference on Fuzzy Systems, 2001, Melbourne.
29. Z. Les and M. Les, Shape understanding system: the visual reasoning process, Int. J. Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence 17(4) (2002) 663-683.
30. Z. Les and M. Les, Shape understanding system: convex class - understanding of the convex objects, J. Electron. Imag. 12(2) (2003) 327-341.
31. Z. Les and M. Les, Shape understanding as knowledge generation, Trans. Data Knowl. Engin. 16(2) (2004) 1-11.
32. Z. Les and M. Les, Visual thinking as a part of understanding process - a new way of problem solving and communication of the intelligent systems in automotive and transportation technology, in Automotive and Transportation Technology International Conf., ATT, 2002, Paris.
33. S. Loncaric, A survey of shape analysis techniques, Patt. Recogn. 31(8) (1998) 983-1001.
34. C. H. Lu and J. G. Dunham, Shape matching using polygon approximation and dynamic alignmen, Patt. Recogn. Lett. 14 (1993) 945-949.
35. S. I. Mahmoud, Arabic character recognition using Fourier descriptors and character contour encoding, Patt. Recogn. 27(6) (1994) 815-824.
36. D. Marr and K. Nishihara, Representation and recognition of the spatial organization of three dimensional shapes, in Proc. Roy. Soc. London, Series B200 (1978) 269-294.
37. D. Marr, Vision (Freeman, San Francisco, 1982).
38. W. Noth, Handbook of Semiotics (Indiana University Press, Bloomington, 1990).
39. N. R. Pal, P. Pal and A. K. Basu, A new shape representation scheme and its application to shape discrimination using a neural network, Patt. Recogn. 26(4) (1993) 543-551.
40. S. Palmer, Visual perception and world knowledge: notes on a model of sensory-cognitive interaction, in Explorations in Cognition, ed. R. Norman (Freeman, San Francisco, 1975).
41. T. Pavlidis and F. Ali, A hierarchical syntactic shape analyzer, IEEE Trans. Patt. Anal. Mach. Intell. PAMI-1(1) (1977) 2-9.
42. S. Pinker, Visual cognition: an introduction, in Visual Cognition, ed. S. Pinker (MIT Press, Cambridge MA, 1984) 1-63.
43. A. R. Pope, Model-Based Object Recognition, a Survey of Recent Research, Department of Computer Science, The University of British Columbia, 1994.
44. P. Quinlan, Differing approaches to two-dimensional shape recognition, Psychol. Bull. 109 (1991) 224-241.
45. W. Richards and D. Hoffman, Codon constraints on elosed 2-D shapes, Graph. Imag. Process. 31 (1985) 265-281.
46. A. Samal and J. Edwards, Generalized Hough transform for natural shapes, Patt Recogn. Lett. 18 (1997) 473-480.
47. B. Tversky and K. Hemenway, Objects, parts and categories, J. Exp. Psychol.: General 113 (1984) 169-193.