Response of benthic invertebrates to disturbance from stream restoration: The importance of bryophytes

Hydrobiologia

Volumn 523, Issue 1-3, 2004, Pages 37-45

  Korsu, Kai ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OULU   (Finland)

Author keywords

benthic macroinvertebrates; bryophytes; disturbance; recovery; refugium; stream restoration

Indexed keywords

BRYOPHYTES; INVERTIBRATES;

OCEAN HABITATS; RIVERS;

MICROORGANISMS;

BENTHOS; BRYOPHYTE; DISTURBANCE; INVERTEBRATE; REFUGIUM; RESTORATION ECOLOGY; STREAM;

EURASIA; EUROPE; FINLAND; NORTHERN EUROPE; SCANDINAVIA;

ANIMALIA; BRYOPHYTA; BRYOPHYTES; INVERTEBRATA; PTERIDOPHYTA;

EID: 3142658856     PISSN: 00188158     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/B:HYDR.0000033086.09499.86     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Bjornn, T. C., 1971. Trout and salmon movements in two Idaho streams as related to temperature, food, stream flow, cover, and population density. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 100: 423-438.
2. Boulton, A. J., G. M. Spangaro & P. S. Lake, 1988. Macroinvertebrate distribution and recolonization on stones subjected to varying degrees of disturbance: an experimental approach. Archiv für Hydrobiologie 113: 551-576.
3. Brusven, M. A., W. R. Meehan & R. C. Biggam, 1990. The role of aquatic moss on community composition and drift of fish-food organisms. Hydrobiologia 196: 39-50.
4. Cellot, B., 1996. Influence of side-arms on aquatic macroinvertebrate drift in the main channel of a large river. Freshwater Biology 35: 149-164.
5. Cobb, D. G., T. D. Galloway & J. F. Flannagan, 1992. Effects of discharge and substrate stability on density and species composition of stream insects. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 49: 1788-1795.
6. Englund, G., 1991. Effects of disturbance on stream moss and invertebrate community structure. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 10: 143-153.
7. Graham, A. A., D. J. McCaughan & F. S. McKee, 1988. Measurement of surface area of stones. Hydrobiologia 157: 85-87.
8. Haapala, A., 2001. Importance of particulate organic matter to invertebrate communities of boreal woodland streams - implications for stream restoration. Ph.D. thesis, Jyväskylä studies in biological and environmental science 96, University of Jyväskylä 2001.
9. Haapala, A. & T. Muotka, 1998. Seasonal dynamics of detritus and associated macroinvertebrates in a channelized boreal stream. Archiv für Hydrobiologie 142: 171-189.
10. Jutila, E., 1992. Restoration of salmonid rivers in Finland. In Boon, P. J., P. Calow & G. E. Petts (eds), River Conservation and Management. John Wiley, Chichester: 353-362.
11. Laasonen, P., T. Muotka & I. Kivijärvi, 1998. Recovery of macroinvertebrate communities from stream habitat restoration. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 8: 101-113.
12. Lake, P. S., 1990. Disturbing hard and soft bottom communities: a comparison of marine and freshwater environments. Australian Journal of Ecology 15: 477-488.
13. Lake, P. S., 2000. Disturbance, patchiness, and diversity in streams. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 19: 573-592.
14. Lancaster, J. & L. R. Belyea, 1997. Nested hierarchies and scale-dependence of mechanisms of flow refugium use. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 16: 221-238.
15. Lancaster, J. & A. G. Hildrew, 1993. Characterizing in-stream flow refugia. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 50: 1663-1675.
16. Mackay, R. J., 1992. Colonization by lotie macroinvertebrates: a review of processes and patterns. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 49: 617-628.
17. Malmqvist, B. & C. Brönmark, 1984. Functional aspects of a lake outlet versus a springfed stream ecosystem. Verhandlungen der internationale Vereiningun für theoretiche und angewandte Limnologie 22: 1992-1996.
18. Matthaei, C. D., U. Uehlinger, E. I. Meyer & A. Frutiger, 1996. Recolonization by invertebrates after experimental disturbance in a Swiss prealpine river. Freshwater Biology 35: 233-248.
19. Matthaei, C. D., U. Uehlinger & A. Frutiger, 1997. Response of benthic invertebrates to natural versus experimental disturbance in a Swiss prealpine river. Freshwater Biology 37: 61-77.
20. Matthaei, C. D., K. A. Peacock & C. R. Townsend, 1999. Patchy surface stone movement during disturbance in a New Zealand stream and its potential significance for the fauna. Limnology and Oceanography 44: 1091-1102.
21. Matthaei, C. D., C. J. Arbuckle & C. D. Townsend, 2000. Stable surface stones as refugia for invertebrates during disturbance in a New Zealand stream. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 19: 82-93.
22. Muotka, T. & P. Laasonen, 2002. Ecosystem recovery in restored headwater streams: the role of enhanced leaf retention. Journal of Applied Ecology 39: 145-156.
23. Muotka, T., R. Paavola, A. Haapala, M. Novikmec & P. Laasonen, 2002. Long-term recovery of stream habitat structure and benthic invertebrate communities from in-stream restoration. Biological Conservation 105: 243-253.
24. Palmer, M. A., A. E. Bely & K. E. Berg, 1992. Response of invertebrates to lotie disturbance: a test of the hyporheic refuge hypothesis. Oecologia 89: 182-194.
25. Poole, W. L. & K. W. Stewart, 1976. The vertical distribution of macrobenthos within the substratum of the Brazos River, Texas. Hydrobiologia 50: 151-160.
26. Reice, S. R., 1985. Experimental disturbance and the maintenance of species diversity in a stream community. Oecologia 67: 90-97.
27. Resh, V. H., A. V. Brown, A. P. Covich, M. E. Gurtz, H. W. Li, G. W. Minshall, S. R. Reice, A. L. Sheldon, J. B. Wallace & R. C. Wissmar, 1988. The role of disturbance in stream ecology. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 7: 433-455.
28. Robinson, C. T. & P. Burgherr, 1999. Seasonal disturbance of a lake outlet benthic community. Archiv für Hydrobiologie 145: 297-315.
29. Shaw, D. W. & G.W. Minshall, 1980. Colonization of an introduced substrate by stream macroinvertebrates. Oikos 34: 259-271.
30. Stream Bryophyte Group, 1999. Roles of bryophytes in stream ecosystems. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 18: 151-184.
31. Suren, A. M., 1991. Bryophytes as invertebrate habitat in two New Zealand alpine streams. Freshwater Biology 26: 399-418.
32. Suren, A. M. & M. J. Winterbourn, 1992. The influence of periphyton, detritus and shelter on invertebrate colonization of aquatic bryophytes. Freshwater Biology 27: 327-339.
33. Tikkanen, P., P. Laasonen, T. Muotka A. Huhta, & K. Kuusela, 1994. Short-term recovery of benthos following disturbance from stream habitat rehabilitation. Hydrobiologia 273: 121-130.
34. Townsend, C. D., 1989. The patch dynamics concept of stream community ecology. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 8: 36-50.
35. Vuori, K.-M. & T. Muotka, 1999. Benthic communities in humic streams. In Keskitalo, J. & P. Eloranta (eds), Limnology of Humic Waters. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden, The Netherlands: 193-207.
36. Williams, D. D., 1980. Temporal patterns in recolonization of stream benthos. Archiv für Hydrobiologie 9(1): 56-74.