Performance of Holstein clones in the United States

Journal of Dairy Science

Volumn 87, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 729-738

  Norman, H D ^a   Lawlor, T J ^b   Wright, J R ^a   Powell, R L ^a  

^a AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH SERVICE   (United States)

^b Holstein Association USA Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

Clone; Embryo splitting; Nuclear transfer; Yield performance

Indexed keywords

ANIMALIA;

LIPID; MILK PROTEIN;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; CATTLE; CELL NUCLEUS TRANSPLANTATION; CHEMISTRY; CLONING; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FEMALE; GENETICS; GENOTYPE; LACTATION; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MILK; PEDIGREE; PHYSIOLOGY; REGISTER; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; UNITED STATES;

ANIMALS; CATTLE; CLONING, ORGANISM; FEMALE; GENOTYPE; LACTATION; LIPIDS; MALE; MILK; MILK PROTEINS; NUCLEAR TRANSFER TECHNIQUES; PEDIGREE; REGISTRIES; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 3142657509     PISSN: 00220302     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(04)73216-6     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Center for Veterinary Medicine, Food and Drug Administration. 2001. Update on livestock cloning. Online: http://www.fda.gov/cvm/index/updates/ clones.htm. Accessed Dec. 11, 2003.
2. Committee on Defining Science-Based Concerns Associated with Products of Animal Biotechnology, Board on Agriculture and Natural Resources, National Research Council. 2002. Animal Biotechnology: Science-Based Concerns. National Academies Press, Washington, DC. Online: http://www.nap.edu/books/0309084393/ html. Accessed Dec. 11, 2003.
3. Echternkamp, S. E., and K. E. Gregory. 2002. Reproductive, growth, feedlot, and carcass traits of twin vs single births in cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 80(E. Suppl. 2):E64-E73. Online: http://www.asas.org/jas/symposia/esupp2/ jas2051.pdf. Accessed Dec. 11, 2003.
4. ImmGen, Inc. 2001. About blood typing. Online: http://www.immgen. com/Services/Verification/Bloodtyping.html. Accessed Dec. 11, 2003.
5. Robl, J. M., R. Prather, F. Barnes, W. Eyestone, D. Northey, B. Gilligan, and N. L. First. 1987. Nuclear transplantation in bovine embryos. J. Anim. Sci. 64:642-647.
6. VanRaden, P. M., A. H. Sanders, M. E. Tooker, R. H. Miller, and H. D. Norman. 2002. Daughter pregnancy rate evaluation of cow fertility. AIPL Res. Rep. DPR1(11-02). Online: http:/aipl.arsusda. gov/docs/reference/fertility/ DPR_rpt.htm. Accessed Dec 11, 2003.
7. Van Vleck, L. D. 1999. Implications of cloning for breed improvement strategies: are traditional methods of animal improvement obsolete? J. Anim. Sci. 77/J. Dairy Sci. 82( Suppl. 2):111-121.
8. Willadsen, S. M. 1979. A method for culture of micromanipulated sheep embryos and its use to produce monozygotic twins. Nature 277:298-300.
9. Young, L. E., K. D. Sinclair, and I. Wilmut, 1998. Large offspring syndrome in cattle and sheep. Rev. Reprod. 3:155-163.