Assessing groundwater vulnerability using travel time and specific surface area as indicators

Hydrogeology Journal

Volumn 6, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 441-449

  Maxe, Lena ^a   Johansson, Per Olof ^b  

^a ROYAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

^b VBB Viak   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 3142647541     PISSN: 14312174     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s100400050166     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Aastrup M, Thunholm B, Johnson J, Bertills U, Berntell A (1995) Groundwater chemistry in Sweden. Swedish Environmental Protection Agency, Report 4416, 52 pp
2. Aller LT, Bennett T, Lehr JH, Petty RJ, Hackett G (1987) DRASTIC: a standardized system for evaluating ground water pollution potential using hydrogeologic settings. US Environmental Protection Agency/600/2-87/035, Washington, DC, 455 pp
3. Barber C, Bates LE, Barron R, Allison H (1993) Assessment of the relative vulnerability of groundwater to pollution: a review and background paper for the conference workshop on vulnerability assessment. J Aust Geol Geophys 14:147-154
4. Carlsson B (1993) Principles for waste disposal: hazardous waste. Terratema AB, Swedish Environmental Protection Agency, Report 4230, 60 pp (in Swedish)
5. Civita M (1994) Vulnerability maps of aquifers subjected to pollution: theory and practice. Pitagora Editrice, Bologna (in Italian)
6. Danish Environmental Protection Agency (1995) Groundwater protection zoning, Copenhagen. Projects on soil and groundwater from the Danish Environmental Protection Agency (Miljøstyrelsen), 14:81 pp (in Danish)
7. Ericsson LO (1988) A Srategy for groundwater use and protection, VIAK. Preliminary reports to the Swedish Environmental Protection Agency (in Swedish)
8. Fredericia J (1990) Saturated hydraulic conductivity of clayey tills and the role of fractures. In: Haldorsen S (ed) Hydrogeological properties of Nordic tills. Nordic Hydrological Programme, Report 25, pp 67-95
9. Hatva T (1994) Effect of gravel extraction on groundwater. In: Soveri J, Suokko T (eds) Future groundwater resources at risk. Proceedings of the Helsinki conference, June 1994, International Association of Hydrological Sciences, Publ 222, pp 427-434
10. Helldén J (1990) Investigation of waste deposit sites: method development and application in Östergötland. Swedish Environmental Protection Agency, Report 3859, 35 pp (in Swedish)
11. Hillel D (1980) Fundamentals of soil physics. Academic Press, London
12. Jarvis NJ, Bergström L, Brown CD (1995) Pesticide leaching models and their use for management purposes. In: Roberts TR, Kearney PC (eds) Environmental behaviour of agrochemicals. John Wiley & Sons, New York, pp 85-220
13. Johansson P-O, Knutsson G, Lindström R, Maxe L, Pellbäck-Scharp C (1993) Groundwater vulnerability assessment: a short state of the art and an outline for research activities and development of methodologies. Dept. of Land and Water Resources, The Royal Institute of Technology, Report to Swedish Environmental Protection Board, 35 pp
14. Lind B (1990) The role of sediment structures for determining the saturated hydraulic conductivity of till. In: Haldorsen S (ed) Hydrogeological properties of Nordic tills. Nordic Hydrological Programme, Report 25, pp 57-66
15. Lindström R, Scharp C (1995) Approaches to groundwater vulnerability assessments: a state of the art report. Division of Land and Water Resources, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, 77 pp
16. Lundberg A (1974) Infiltration and percolation in top soils: a compilation of Nordic investigations. International Hydrological Decade, Report 35, 58 pp (in Swedish)
17. National Research Council (1993) Ground water vulnerability assessment: predicting relative contamination potential under conditions of uncertainty. National Academy Press, Washington, DC
18. National Rivers Authority (1992) Policy and practice for the protection of groundwater. National Rivers Authority, Bristol, 52 PP
19. Pennell KD, Boyd SA, Abriola LM (1995) Surface area of soil organic matter re-examined. J Soil Sci Soc Am 59:1012-1018
20. Rosén L (1994) A study of the DRASTIC methodology with emphasis on Swedish conditions. Ground water 32:278-285
21. Rosén L, Gustafson G (1993) Groundwater vulnerability: suggestions for further concept development. Dept. of Geology, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg B 383, 18 PP
22. Schleyer R (1994) Quantification of groundwater vulnerability using statistical methods. In: Soveri J, Suokko T (eds) Future groundwater resources at risk. Proceedings of the Helsinki conference, June 1994, International Association of Hydrological Sciences, Publ 222, pp 85-95
23. Swedish Geological Survey (1969) Geological map. Stockholm SO. Swedish Geological Survey, Series Ae, no 3
24. Swedish Geological Survey (1985) Description and appendices to the hydrogeological map of Halland county. Swedish Geological Survey, Series Ah, no 8, 73 pp (in Swedish)
25. Swedish Geological Survey (1993) Comments on map for groundwater protection, Haninge municipality. Swedish Geological Survey, 4 pp (in Swedish)
26. Sverdrup H, Warfvinge P (1992) Critical loads for groundwater. In: Sandén P, Warfvinge P (eds) Modelling groundwater response to acidification. Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute Reports, Hydrology, no 5, 210 pp
27. Troedsson T, Nykvist N (1973) Soil science and soil conservation, Almqvist and Wiksell Läromedel AB, Stockholm (in Swedish)
28. Vrba J, Zaporozec A (eds) (1994) Guidebook on mapping groundwater vulnerability. International Contributions to Hydrogeology, vol 16, 131 pp. Verlag Heinz Heise GmbH & Co KG, Hannover