The CTY talent search: International applicability and practice in Ireland

High Ability Studies

Volumn 7, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 179-190

  Barnett, Linda Boliek ^a   Gilheany, Sheila ^b  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b DUBLIN CITY UNIVERSITY   (Ireland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 3142619682     PISSN: 13598139     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0937445960070208     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. BARNETT, L.B. & DURDEN, W.G. (1993). Education patterns of academically talented youth. Gifted Child Quarterly, 37(4), 161-168.
2. BARNETT, L.B., FAVAZZA, A.E. & DURDEN, W.G. (1983, April). Finding the gifted: A system that searches out and nurtures talented students. American Education, 40-43.
3. BRODY, L.E. & KOLITCH, E.R. (1992). Mathematics acceleration of highly talented students: An evaluation. Gifted Child Quarterly, 36(2), 78-85.
4. BURTON, N.W. (1988). Survey II: Test-taking history for 1980-81 young SAT-takers (Report No. 88-1). New York: College Entrance Examination Board.
5. BURDEN, W. G. (1994). The optimal match: A primer for change. Baltimore, MB: Center for Talented Youth, The Johns Hopkins University,
6. DURDEN, W. G. (1995). Collaboration with a legacy - The Johns Hopkins University CTY - University of Hamburg Models for the Advancement of Mathematically Talented Youth. In B. Zimmermann (Ed), Kaleidoskop elementar-mathematischen Entdeckens [The kaleidoscope of mathematical discovery] (pp.21-28). Bad Salzdetfurth: Franzbecker.
7. GOLDSTEIN, D., STOCKING, V.B. & SAWYER, R.N. (1992). The talented adolescent: Data from TIP's first decade. In N. Colangelo, S.G. Assouline & D.L. Ambroson (Eds.), Talent development: Proceedings from The 1991 Henry B. and Jocelyn Wallace National Research Symposium on Talent Development (pp.298-318). Unionville, NY: Trillium Press.
8. HUNT, J.McV. (1961). Intelligence and experience. New York: Ronald.
9. KEATING, D.P. & STANLEY, J.C. (1972). Extreme measures for the exceptionally gifted in mathematics and science. Educational Researcher, 1, 3-7.
10. MARYLAND TASK FORCE ON GIFTED AND TALENTED EDUCATION. (1994). Renewing our commitment to the education of gifted and talented students: An essential component of educational reform. In Recommendations for Gifted and Talented Education in Maryland, Baltimore, MD.
11. MILLS, C.J., ABLARD, K.E. & LYNCH, S.J. (1992). Academically talented students' preparation for advanced-level course work after an individually paced precalculus class. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 16(1), 3-17.
12. ROBINSON, N.S. & ROBINSON, H.B. (1982). The optimal match: Devising the best compromise for the highly gifted student. In D. Feldman (Ed.), New directions for child development. Developmental approaches to giftedness and creativity, No. 17, (pp. 79-94). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
13. STANLEY, J.C. (1976). Use of tests to discover talent. In D.P. Keating (Ed.), Intellectual talent: Research and development (pp. 3-22). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
14. STANLEY, J.C. (1977). The predictive value of the SAT for brilliant seventh- and eighth-graders. College Board Review, 106, 30-37.
15. STANLEY, J.C. (1990). Leta Hollingworth's contributions to above-level testing of the gifted. Roeper Review, 12(3), 166-177.
16. STANLEY, J.C., HUANG, I. & ZHU, X. (1986). SAT-M scores of highly selected students in Shanghai tested when less than 13 years old. College Board Review, 140, 10-13 & 28-29.
17. VAN TASSEL-BASKA, J. (1984). The Talent Search as an identification model. Gifted Child Quarterly, 28(4), 172-176.
18. VAN TASSEL-BASKA, J. (1986). The use of aptitude tests for identifying the gifted: The Talent Search concept. Roeper Review, 5(3), 185-189.