Applicability of Sherwood correlations for natural organic matter (NOM) transport in nanofiltration (NF) membranes

Journal of Membrane Science

Volumn 240, Issue 1-2, 2004, Pages 49-65

  Lee, Sangyoup ^a   Amy, Gary ^b   Cho, Jaeweon ^a  

^a Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology (GIST)   (South Korea)

^b UCB 450   (United States)

Author keywords

Combined film thermodynamic model; Diffusion coefficient; Mass transfer coefficient; NOM NF system; Pore Peclet number; Sherwood correlation

Indexed keywords

DIFFUSION; LAMINAR FLOW; MASS TRANSFER; PH EFFECTS; THERMODYNAMICS;

MEMBRANE SCIENCE; SHERWOOD CORRELATION;

POLYMERIC MEMBRANES;

ORGANIC MATTER; WATER;

MASS TRANSFER; NANOFILTRATION; ORGANIC MATTER; ORGANIC MEMBRANE; TRANSPORT PROPERTY;

ARTICLE; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; CROSSFLOW FILTRATION; DIFFUSION; DIFFUSION COEFFICIENT; FLOW RATE; IONIC STRENGTH; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MEMBRANE CHANNEL; MEMBRANE FILTER; NANOFILTRATION; PH; POROSITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SUCTION; TRANSPORT KINETICS; WATER PERMEABILITY;

EID: 3142608868     PISSN: 03767388     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2004.04.011     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Eriksoon P. Nanofiltration extends the range of membrane filtration. Environ. Progress. 7:1988;58
2. Nystrom M., Kaipia L., Luque S. Fouling and retention of nanofiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 98:1995;249
3. Amy G.L., Cho J. Interaction between natural organic matter (NOM) and membranes: rejection and fouling. Water Sci. Technol. 40:1999;131
4. Cho J., Amy G.L., Pellegrino J. Membrane filtration of natural organic matter: initial comparison of rejection and flux decline characteristics with ultrafiltration and nonofiltration membranes. Water Res. 33:1999;2517
5. Hong S.K., Elimelech M. Chemical and physical aspects of natural organic matter (NOM) fouling of nanofiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 132:1997;159
6. Braghetta A., DiGiano F.A., Bell W.P. Nanofiltration of natural organic matter: pH and ionic strength effects. J. Environ. Eng. ASCE. 123:1997;628
7. Nilson J., DiGiano F.A. Influence of NOM composition on nanofiltration. J. Am. Water Works Assoc. 88:1996;53
8. W.F. Blatt, in: P. Meares (Ed.), Membrane Separation Processes, Elservier, Amsterdam, 1976.
9. Brian P.L.T. Concentration polarization in reverse osmosis desalination with variable flux and incomplete salt rejection. Ind. Eng. Chem. Fundam. 4:1965;439
10. Spiegler K.S., Kedem O. Thermodynamic of hyperifltration (reverse osmosis): critera for efficient membranes. Desalination. 1:1966;311
11. Kedem O., Katchalsky A. Thermodynamic analysis of the permeability of biological membranes to non-electrolytes. Biochem. Biophys. Acta. 27:1958;229
12. Sherwood T.K., Brian P.L., Fisher R.E. Desalination by reverse osmosis. Ind. Eng. Chem. Fundam. 6:1967;2
13. Linton W.H., Sherwood T.K. Mass transfer from solids shapes to water in streamline and turbulent flow. Chem. Eng. Progress. 46:1950;258
14. M. Mulder, Basic Principles of Membrane Technology, Kluwer Academic Publisher, Dordrecht/Boston/London, 1991.
15. Sutzkover I., Hasson D., Semiat R. Simple technique for measuring the concentration polarization level in a reverse osmosis system. Desalination. 131:2000;117
16. Murthy Z.V.P., Gupta S.K. Sodium cyanide separation and parameter estimation for reverse osmosis thin film composite polyamide membrane. J. Membr. Sci. 154:1999;89
17. Mason E.A., Lonsdale H.K. Statistical-mechanical theory of membrane transport. J. Membr. Sci. 51:1990;1
18. S. Sourirajan (Ed.), Reverse Osmosis and Synthetic Membranes: Theory-Technology-Engineering, National Research Council of Canada, 1977.
19. Jonsson G., Bossen C.E. Water and solute transport through cellulose acetate reverse osmosis membranes. J. Appl. Chem. 16:1966;153
20. Tandon A., Gupta S.K., Agarwal G.P. Modelling of protein transmission through ultrafiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 97:1994;83
21. Mochisuki S., Zydney A.L. Dextran transport through asymmetric ultrafiltration membranes: comparison with hydrodynamic models. J. Membr. Sci. 68:1992;21
22. Collins M.R., Amy G.L., Steelink C. Molecular weight distribution, carboxylic acidity, and humic content of aquatic organic matter: implications for removal during water treatment. Environ. Sci. Technol. 20:1986;1028
23. Shim Y., Lee H.J., Lee S., Moon S.H., Cho J. Effects of natural organic matter and ionic species on membrane surface charge. Environ. Sci. Technol. 36:2002;3864
24. Wang Y., Combe C., Clark M.M. The effects of pH and calcium on the diffusion coefficient of humic acid. J. Membr. Sci. 183:2001;49
25. E.L. Cussler, Diffusion: Mass transfer in fluid systems, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1984, pp. 132-143.
26. Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 83rd ed., CRC Press, 2002.