-
1
-
-
0033147122
-
-
Supernova Cosmology Project Collaboration, S. Perlmutter, Astrophys. J. 517, 565 (1999)
-
(1999)
Astrophys. J.
, vol.517
, pp. 565
-
-
Perlmutter, S.1
-
3
-
-
0039243415
-
-
Supernova Search Team Collaboration, A. G. Riess, Astron. J. 116, 1009 (1998).
-
(1998)
Astron. J.
, vol.116
, pp. 1009
-
-
Riess, A.G.1
-
12
-
-
0034238082
-
-
T. D. Saini, S. Raychaudhury, V. Sahni, and A. A. Starobinsky, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 1162 (2000).
-
(2000)
Phys. Rev. Lett.
, vol.85
, pp. 1162
-
-
Saini, T.D.1
Raychaudhury, S.2
Sahni, V.3
Starobinsky, A.A.4
-
14
-
-
85039028833
-
-
http://snap.lbl.gov/
-
http://snap.lbl.gov/
-
-
-
-
17
-
-
0037098372
-
-
I. Maor, R. Brustein, J. McMahon, and P. J. Steinhardt, Phys. Rev. D 65, 123003 (2002).
-
(2002)
Phys. Rev. D
, vol.65
, pp. 123003
-
-
Maor, I.1
Brustein, R.2
McMahon, J.3
Steinhardt, P.J.4
-
20
-
-
33646617635
-
-
M. Goliath, R. Amanullah, P. Astier, A. Goobar, and R. Pain, “Supernovae and the nature of the dark energy,” astro-ph/0104009.
-
Supernovae and the nature of the dark energy
-
-
Goliath, M.1
Amanullah, R.2
Astier, P.3
Goobar, A.4
Pain, R.5
-
25
-
-
17144391472
-
-
G. Huey, L. M. Wang, R. Dave, R. R. Caldwell, and P. J. Steinhardt, Phys. Rev. D 59, 063005 (1999).
-
(1999)
Phys. Rev. D
, vol.59
, pp. 63005
-
-
Huey, G.1
Wang, L.M.2
Dave, R.3
Caldwell, R.R.4
Steinhardt, P.J.5
-
27
-
-
3843050306
-
-
J. A. Frieman, D. Huterer, E. V. Linder, and M. S. Turner, Phys. Rev. D 67, 083505 (2003).
-
(2003)
Phys. Rev. D
, vol.67
, pp. 83505
-
-
Frieman, J.A.1
Huterer, D.2
Linder, E.V.3
Turner, M.S.4
-
29
-
-
4243499582
-
-
C. J. Odman, A. Melchiorri, M. P. Hobson, and A. N. Lasenby, Phys. Rev. D 67, 083511 (2003).
-
(2003)
Phys. Rev. D
, vol.67
, pp. 83511
-
-
Odman, C.J.1
Melchiorri, A.2
Hobson, M.P.3
Lasenby, A.N.4
-
31
-
-
85039015160
-
-
Recall that our criterion for indistinguishable models is that their (Formula presented)’s do not differ by more than 1% in the range (Formula presented)
-
Recall that our criterion for indistinguishable models is that their (Formula presented)’s do not differ by more than 1% in the range (Formula presented)
-
-
-
-
32
-
-
85039013214
-
-
It is worth noting here that although (Formula presented) is interpreted as a contribution to the vacuum energy which has (Formula presented) offsetting (Formula presented) from zero and allowing V to have negative regions can yield (Formula presented) while the field is still dynamical. For example, if (Formula presented) is the kinetic energy of the field), then (Formula presented)
-
It is worth noting here that although (Formula presented) is interpreted as a contribution to the vacuum energy which has (Formula presented) offsetting (Formula presented) from zero and allowing V to have negative regions can yield (Formula presented) while the field is still dynamical. For example, if (Formula presented) is the kinetic energy of the field), then (Formula presented)
-
-
-
|