Imaging of the lower limb arteries: When, how and why? Focus...;Quand, comment et pourquoi réaliser une imagerie des artères des membres inférieurs: Le point sur...

Journal de Radiologie

Volumn 85, Issue 6 II, 2004, Pages 845-853

  Laissy, J P ^a   Pernes, J M ^a  

^a BICHAT HOSPITAL   (France)

Author keywords

Arteries; Atherosclerosis; CT; MR studies

Indexed keywords

CONTRAST MEDIUM;

ANGIOGRAPHY; ARTERY CALCIFICATION; COLOR ULTRASOUND FLOWMETRY; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; HUMAN; LIMB BLOOD VESSEL; LIMB ISCHEMIA; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; NEPHROTOXICITY; REVIEW; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TREATMENT PLANNING;

EID: 3142594181     PISSN: 02210363     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/s0221-0363(04)97690-1     Document Type: Review

References (26)

1. Gillum RF. Peripheral arterial occlusive disease of the extremities in the United States: hospitalization and mortality. Am Heart J 1990;120:1414-8.
2. INSERM. Imagerie Médicale en France dans les hôpitaux publics, expertise collective. 1996.
3. Lundin P, Svensson A, Henriksen E et al. Imaging of aortoiliac arterial disease. Duplex ultrasound and MR angiography versus digital subtraction angiography. Acta Radiol 2000;41:125-32.
4. Eiberg JP, Madycki G, Hansen MA, Christiansen S, Gronvall Rasmussen JB, Schroeder TV. Ultrasound imaging of infrainguinal arterial disease has a high interobserver agreement. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2002;24:293-9.
5. Lujan S, Criado E, Puras E, Izquierdo LM. Duplex scanning or arteriography for preoperative planning of lower limb revascularisation. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2002;24:31-6.
6. Owen RS, Baum RA, Carpenter JP, Holland GA, Cope C. Symptomatic peripheral vascular disease: selection of imaging parameters and clinical evaluation with MR angiography. Radiology 1993;187:627-35.
7. Ofer A, Nitecki SS, Linn S et al. Multidetector CT angiography of peripheral vascular disease: a prospective comparison with intraarterial digital subtraction angiography. AJR 2003;180:719-24.
8. Martin ML, Tay KH, Flak B et al. Multidetector CT angiography of the aortoiliac system and lower extremities: a prospective comparison with digital subtraction angiography. AJR 2003;180:1085-91.
9. Ho KY, Leiner T, de Haan MW, Kessels AG, Kitslaar PJ, van Engelshoven JM. Peripheral vascular tree stenoses: evaluation with moving-bed infusion-tracking MR angiography. Radiology 1998;206:683-92.
10. Carriero A, Maggialetti A, Pinto D et al. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography MoBI-trak in the study of peripheral vascular disease. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2002;25:42-7.
11. Steffens JC, Schafer FK, Oberscheid B et al. Bolus-chasing contrast-enhanced 3D MRA of the lower extremity. Acta Radiol 2003;44:185-92.
12. Zimmermann-Paul GG, Quick HH, Vogt P, von Schultess GK, Kling D, Debatin JF. High-resolution intravascular magnetic resonance imaging: monitoring of plaque formation in heritable hyperlipidemic rabbits. Circulation 1999;99:1054-61.
13. Ruehm SG, Corot C, Vogt P, Kolb S, Debatin JF. Magnetic resonance imaging of atherosclerotic plaque with ultrasmall superparamagnetic particles of iron oxide in hyperlipidemic rabbits. Circulation 2001;103:415-22.
14. Lawrence JA, Kim D, Kent KC, Stehling MK, Rosen MP, Raptopoulos V. Lower extremity spiral CT angiography versus catheter angiography. Radiology 1995;194:903-8.
15. Rieker O, Duber C, Schmiedt W, von Zitzewitz H, Schweden F, Thelen M. Prospective comparison of CT angiography of the legs with intraarterial digital subtraction angiography. AJR 1996;166:269-76.
16. Beregi JP, Djabbari M, Desmoucelle F, Willoteaux S, Wattinne L, Louvegny S. Popliteal vascular disease: evaluation with spiral CT angiography. Radiology 1997;203:477-83.
17. Bourlet P, De Fraissinnette B, Garcier JM et al. Evaluation comparative de l'angio-TDM spiralée, de l'angio-IRM 2D temps de vol et 3D gadolinium en pathologie athéromateuse aorto-iliaque. J Radiol 2000;81:1619-25.
18. Kramer SC, Gorich J, Aschoff AJ et al. Diagnostic value of spiral-CT angiography in comparison with digital subtraction angiography before and after peripheral vascular intervention. Angiology 1998;49:599-606.
19. Cronberg CN, Sjoberg S, Albrechtsson U et al. Peripheral arterial disease. Contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography of the lower leg and foot compared with conventional angiography. Acta Radiol 2003;44:59-66.
20. Quinn SF, Sheley RC, Semonsen KG, Leonardo VJ, Kojima K, Szumowski J. Aortic and lower-extremity arterial disease: evaluation with MR angiography versus conventional angiography. Radiology 1998;206:693-701.
21. Ho KY, Leiner T, Van Engelshoven JM. MR angiography of run-off vessels. Eur Radiol 1999;9:1285-9.
22. Dorenbeck U, Seitz J, Volk M et al. Evaluation of arterial bypass grafts of the pelvic and lower extremities with gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography: comparison with digital subtraction angiography. Invest Radiol 2002;37:60-4.
23. Bertschinger K, Cassina PC, Debatin JF, Ruehm SG. Surveillance of peripheral arterial bypass grafts with three-dimensional MR angiography: comparison with digital subtraction angiography. AJR 2001;176:215-20.
24. Yin D, Baum RA, Carpenter JP, Langlotz CP, Pentecost MJ. Cost-effectiveness of MR angiography in cases of limb-threatening peripheral vascular disease. Radiology 1995;194:757-64.
25. Douek PC, Revel D, Chazel S, Falise B, Villard J, Amiel M. Fast MR angiography of the aortoiliac arteries and arteries of the lower extremity: value of bolus-enhanced, whole volume subtraction technique. AJR 1995;165:431-7.
26. Rofsky NM, Johnson G, Adelman MA, Rosen RJ, Krinsky GA, Weinreb JC. Peripheral vascular disease evaluated with reduced-dose gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography. Radiology 1997;205:163-9.