Intraoperative cytology in dogs and cats;Zur intraoperativen zytologischen diagnostik bei hund und katze

Tierarztliche Praxis Ausgabe K: Kleintiere - Heimtiere

Volumn 32, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 140-146

  Stockhaus, C ^a,d   Taprogge, B ^a   Schoon, H A ^b   Scharvogel, S ^a   Grevel, Vera ^a   Oechtering, G ^a   Teske, E ^c  

^a Klinik für Kleintiere   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LEIPZIG   (Germany)

^c UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^d Tierarztl Fachklinik F Kleintiere   (Germany)

Author keywords

Cat; Cytology; Dog; Intraoperative diagnosis

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CYTOLOGY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; ENDOCRINE SYSTEM; HISTOLOGY; HISTOPATHOLOGY; LYMPH NODE; MEDICAL EXAMINATION; MESENCHYMOMA; MOUTH CAVITY; MUSCULOSKELETAL SYSTEM; NONHUMAN; PERITONEUM; PEROPERATIVE CARE; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RESPIRATORY SYSTEM;

CANIS FAMILIARIS; FELIS CATUS;

EID: 3142590539     PISSN: 14341239     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1622412     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Anastasiadis P, Sivridis E, Koutlaki N, Tamiolakis D, Galazios G, Tsikouras P. The significance of rapid intraoperative cytology in the evaluation of intraperitoneal and retroperitoneal spread of cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2002; 84: 102-9.
2. Arora HL, Solanki RL, Poonia IJ. The role of imprint cytology in diagnosis of various bone and joint diseases. Indian J Cancer 1990; 27: 38-45.
3. Bennert KW, Abdul-Karim FW. Fine needle aspiration cytology vs. needle core biopsy of soft tissue tumors. A comparison. Acta Cytol 1994; 38: 381-4.
4. Chonmaitri IS. Imprint cytologic examination as an adjunct to frozen section. J Med Assoc Thai 1993; 76: 458-64.
5. Dollahite HA, Tatum L, Moinuddin SM, Carnesale PG. Aspiration biopsy of primary neoplasms of bone. J Bone Joint Surg 1989; 71: 1166-9.
6. Eich CS, Whitehair JG, Moroff S, Heeb LA. The accuracy of intraoperative cytopathological diagnosis compared with conventional histopathological diagnosis. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 2000; 36: 16-8.
7. Feinberg MR, Bhaskar AG, Bourne P. Differential diagnosis of malignant lymphomas by imprint cytology. Acta Cytol 1980; 24: 16-25.
8. Florell SR, Layfield LJ, Gerwels JW. A comparison of touch imprint cytology and Mohs frozen-section histology in the evaluation of Mohs micrographic surgical margins. J Am Acad Dermatol 2001; 44: 660-4.
9. Hahn PF, Eisenberg PJ, Pitman MB, Gazelle GS, Mueller PR. Cytopathologic touch preparations (imprints) from core needle: accuracy compared with fine-needle aspirates. Am J Roentgenol 1995; 165: 1277-9.
10. Hall RL, MacWilliams PS. The cytologic examination of cutaneous and subcutaneous masses. Sem Vet Med Surg 1988; 3: 94-108.
11. Jayaram G, Miac MD, Gupta M. Fine needle aspiration cytology in the diagnosis of bone tumours. Malaysian J Pathol 1994; 16: 137-44.
12. Kinias IS, Rammou-Kinia R. Cytology of bone lesions by intraoperative sampling during fracture treatment. Diagn Cytopathol 2002; 26: 145-9.
13. Lukacs GL, Miko TL, Fabian E, Zs-Nagy I, Csaky G, Balazs G. The validity of some morphologic methods in the diagnosis of thyroid malignancy. Acta Chir Scand 1983; 149: 759-66.
14. Mahmood S, Conway D, Ramesar KC. Use of intraoperative cytologic assessment of mandibular marrow scrapings to predict resection margin status in patients with squamous cell carcinoma. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2001; 59: 1138-41.
15. Miralles TG, Gosalbez F, Menendez P, Astudillo A, Torre C, Buesa J. Fine needle aspiration cytology in soft-tissue lesions. Acta Cytol 1986; 30: 671-8.
16. Noguchi M. Sentinel lymph node biopsy as an alternative to routine axillary lymph node dissection in breast cancer patients. J Surg Oncol 2001; 76: 144-56.
17. O'Keefe DA, Couto CG. Fine-needle aspiration of the spleen as an aid in the diagnosis of splenomegaly. J Vet Int Med 1987; 1: 102-9.
18. Orell SR, Sterrettt GF, Walters MN, Whitaker D. Lunge, Mediastinum, Pleura. In: Punktionszytologie, 1. Aufl. Berlin: Thieme 1999; 167-212.
19. Powers CN, Berardo MD, Frable J. Fine-Needle aspiration biopsy: Pitfalls in the diagnosis of spindle-cell lesions. Diagnostic Cytopathol 1994; 10: 232-41.
20. Saito Y, Yamakawa Y, Kiriyama M, Fukai I, Kondo S, Kaji M, Yano M, Yokoyama T, Fujii Y. Diagnosis of visceral pleural invasion by lung cancer using intraoperative touch cytology. Ann Thorac Surg 2002; 73: 1552-6.
21. Scopa CD, Melachrinou M, Apessou D, Bonikos D. Tissue imprints in surgical pathology: a rapid intraoperative diagnostic aid. Diagn Cytopathol 1990; 6: 5-8.
22. Shin MH, Hajdu SI. Management of soft tissue sarcomas of the extremity. Sem Oncol 1981; 8: 172-9.
23. Souka S, Kamel M, Rocca M, el Assi M, Hebeishy N, Sheir SH. The combined use of cytological imprint and frozen section in the intraoperative diagnosis of ovarian tumors. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1990; 31: 43-6.
24. Stockhaus C, Teske E. Klinische Erfahrungen mit Feinnadelbiopsien der Milz bei der Diagnostik von Splenomegalien beim Hund. Kleintierprax 1998; 43: 325-36.
25. Stockhaus C, Teske E. Die zytologische Diagnostik von Umfangsvermehrungen der Haut, Unterhaut und Mundhöhle bei Hund und Katze - Eine retrospektive Untersuchung (1995). Kleintierprax 1999; 44: 421-34.
26. Stockhaus C, Teske E. Klinische Erfahrungen mit der zytologischen Diagnostik beim Hund. Schweiz Arch Tierheilkd 2000; 143: 233-40.
27. Stockhaus C, Schoon HA, Scharvogel S, Teske E. Die Bedeutung der Zytologie für den Nachweis von Knochentumoren bei Hund und Katze. Tierärztl Prax 2003; 31 (K): 117-23.
28. Stockhaus C, Schoon HA, Grevel V, Oechtering G, Teske E. Zur diagnostischen Aussagekraft der Zytologie für den Nachweis von Weichteilsarkomen bei Hund und Katze. Tierärztl Prax 2003; 31 (K): 148-53.
29. Stockhaus C, van den Ingh TAI, Rothuizen J, Teske E. A multistep approach in the cytologic evaluation of liverbiopsies of dogs with hepatic diseases. Vet Pathol 2004 (accepted).
30. Suen KC, Wood WS, Syed A, Quenville NF, Clement PB. Role of imprint cytology in the intraoperative diagnosis: value and limitations. J Clin Pathol 1978; 31: 328-37.
31. Thunnissen FB, Peterse JL, van Pel R, Jansen JW, Ladde BE, Arends JW, Volovics A. Reliability of fine needle aspiration cytology for distinguishing between carcinoma, lymphoma and sarcoma; the influence of clinical information. Cytopathology 1993; 4: 107-14.
32. Thunnissen FB, Kroese AH, Ambergen AW, Peters JL, Jansen JW, Ladde BE, van Pel R, Tiebosch ATMG, Schaafsma W. Which cytological criteria are the most discriminative to distinguish carcinoma, lymphoma, and soft-tissue sarcoma? Diagn Cytopathol 1997; 17: 333-8.
33. Tyler RD, Cowell RL, Meinkoth JH. Cutaneous and subcutaneous lesions. In: Diagnostic Cytology and Hematology in the Dog and Cat, 2nd ed. Cowell RL, Tyler RD, Meinkoth JH, ed. St. Louis: Mosby 1999; 20-51.
34. Venetti S, Ioannidou-Mouzaka L, Toufexi H, Xenitides J, Anastasiadis P. Imprint cytology. A rapid, reliable method of diagnosing breast malignancy. Acta Cytol 1996; 40: 649-52.
35. Whitehair JG, Griffey SM, Olander HJ, Vasseur PB, Naydan D. The accuracy of intraoperative diagnoses based on examination of frozen sections. Vet Surg 1993; 22: 255-9.
36. Wood EF, O'Brien RT, Young KM. Ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of focal parenchymal lesions of the lung in dogs and cats. J Vet Intern Med 1998; 12: 338-42.