Reform of undergraduate medical teaching in the United Kingdom: A triumph of evangelism over common sense

British Medical Journal

Volumn 329, Issue 7457, 2004, Pages 92-94

  Williams, Gareth ^a   Lau, Alice ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CURRICULUM; HUMAN; LEARNING; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL PRACTICE; MEDICAL SCHOOL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SHORT SURVEY; UNITED KINGDOM;

EID: 3142583434     PISSN: 09598146     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.329.7457.92     Document Type: Short Survey

References (8)

1. General Medical Council. Tomorrow's doctors. Recommendations on undergraduate medical education. London: GMC, 2002.
2. Norman G. Research in medical education: three decades of progress. BMJ 2002;324:1560-2.
3. Misch DA. Andragogy and medical education: are medical students internally motivated to learn? Adv Health Ser Educ 2002;7:153-60.
4. Wood DF. ABC of learning and teaching in medicine: problem based learning. BMJ 2002.
5. Woodward CA, Ferrier BM. The content of the medical curriculum at McMaster University: graduates' evaluation of their preparation for postgraduate training. Med Educ 1983;17:54-60.
6. Vernon DTA, Blake RL. Does problem-based learning work? A meta-analysis of evaluate research. Acad Med 1993;68:550-63.
7. Chastonay P, Brenner E, Peel S, Guilbert J-J. The need for more efficiency and relevance in medical education. Med Educ 1996;30:235-8.
8. Barrows HS, Norman GR, Neufeld VR, Feightner JW. The clinical reasoning process of randomly selected physicians in general medical practice. Clin Invest Med 1982;5:49-56.