Evidence-based urology - A utopia?

European Urology

Volumn 46, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 143-146

  Månsson, Wiking ^a  

^a LUND UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

Author keywords

EBM; Evidence based medicine

Indexed keywords

ALLOPURINOL; ANDROGEN;

BLADDER CANCER; BLADDER RECONSTRUCTION; CHRONIC PROSTATITIS; CONFERENCE PAPER; DATA BASE; DRUG INDICATION; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; HORMONE INHIBITION; HUMAN; IMMUNOTHERAPY; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MEDLINE; PATIENT CARE; PHILOSOPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SURGICAL TRAINING; URINE INCONTINENCE; VALIDATION PROCESS;

EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; HUMANS; PUBLISHING; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS; UROLOGY;

EID: 3142566666     PISSN: 03022838     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2004.04.015     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Sackett D.L., Rosenberg W.M.C., Gray J.A.M., Haynes R.B., Richardson W.S. Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't. BMJ. 312:1996;71-72
2. Djulbegovic B., Lyman G., Ruckdeschel J.C. Why evidence-based oncology? Editorial. Evidence-based Oncology. 1:2000;2-5
3. Chalmers T.C., Smith H. Jr., Blackburn B., Silverman B., Schroeder B., Reitman D., et al. A method for assessing the quality of a randomized control trial. Control Clin. Trials. 2:1981;31-49
4. Begg C., Cho M., Eastwood S., Horton R., Moher D., Olkin I., et al. Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement. JAMA. 276:1996;637-639
5. Moher D., Schulz K.F., Altman D.G. for the CONSORT Group The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials. JAMA. 285:2001;1987-1991
6. Downs S.H., Black N. The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. J. Epidemiol. Community Health. 52:1998;377-384
7. Bracken M.B. Reporting observational studies. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 96:1989;383-388
8. Rangel S.J., Moss R.L. The need for critical analysis of case-series reporting in Pediatric Surgery. Seminars in Pediatric Surgery. 11:2002;184-189
9. Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine Levels of Evidence (May 2001). http://www.cebm.net/levels_of_evidence.asp.
10. Abrams P, Grant A, Khoury S. Evidence-based medicine. Overview of the main steps for developing and grading guideline recommendations. ICUD, 2004.
11. Harris R.P., Helfand M., Woolf S.H., Lohr K.N., Mulrow C.D., Teutsch S.M., Atkins D. for the Methods Work Group, third U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Current methods of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force: a review of the process. Am. J. Prev. Med. 20(3S):2001;21-35
12. Hardin Jr WD, Stylianos S, Lally KP. Evidence-based practice in pediatric surgery. J Pediatr Surg 1999;34:908-912 [Discussion 912-913].
13. McCulloch P., Taylor I., Sasako M., Lovett B., Griffin D. Randomised trials in surgery: problems and possible solutions. BMJ. 324:2002;1448-1451
14. Grimes D.A., Bachicha J.A., Learman L.E. Teaching critical appraisal to medical students in obstetrics and gynecology. Obstet. Gynecol. 92:1998;877-882
15. Olatunbosun O.A., Edouard L., Pierson R.A. Physician's attitudes toward evidence based obstetric practice: a questionnaire survey. BMJ. 316:1998;3365-3366
16. Salomon M.J., McLeod R.S. Clinical studies in surgical journals - have we improved? Dis. Colon. Rectum. 36:1993;43-48
17. NICE. Guideline Development Process - Information for National Collaborating Centres and Guideline Development Groups. 2001, NICE, London. http://www.nice.org.uk/pdf/guidelinedevelopmentnccsfinal.pdf.