Biomorphometric analysis of human prostatic carcinoma by using three-dimensional computer models

Human Pathology

Volumn 35, Issue 7, 2004, Pages 798-807

  Werahera, Priya N ^a   Miller, Gary J ^a   Torkko, Kathleen ^a   Crawford, E David ^a   Stewart, J Scott ^a   Deantoni, Edward P ^a   Miller, Heidi L ^a   Lucia, M Scott ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

Author keywords

3 D computer model; clinically threatening; Gleason grades; multifocality; planimetric technique; prostate cancer; prostate specific antigen; PSA; Six Random Systematic Core Biopsy; SRSCB; transrectal ultrasound; TRUS; tumor volume; wire frame model

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CANCER GRADING; COMPUTER MODEL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC ERROR; DISEASE SEVERITY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MORPHOMETRICS; PROSTATE; PROSTATE BIOPSY; PROSTATE CARCINOMA; PROSTATECTOMY; TUMOR VOLUME;

ADENOCARCINOMA; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MALE; MODELS, ANATOMIC; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS;

EID: 3142566442     PISSN: 00468177     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2004.02.015     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Jemal A., Tiwari R.C., Murray T., et al. Cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 2004. 54:2004;8-29
2. Jemal A., Thomas A., Murray T., et al. Cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 52:2002;23-47
3. American Cancer Society [ACS]. Cancer Facts and Figures 2003. 2003;2 ACS, Atlanta, GA
4. Sakr W.A., Grignon D.J., Crissman J.D. High grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) and prostatic adenocarcinoma between ages of 20-69 An autopsy study of 249 cases. In Vivo. 8:1994;439-443
5. Miller G.J., Cygan J.M. Diagnostic correlations with whole mount of radical prostatectomy specimens. Monogr Pathol. 34:1992;183-197
6. Miller G.J. Histopathology of prostate cancer Prediction of malignant behavior and correlation with ultrasonography. Urology. 33:(suppl):1989;18-26
7. Hodge K.K., McNeal J.C., Terris M.K., et al. Random systematic versus directed ultrasound guided transrectal core biopsies of the prostate. J Urol. 142:1989;71-74
8. Tobler M., Watson G., Leavitt D.D. The application of dynamic field shaping and dynamic dose rate control in conformal rotational treatment of the prostate. Med Dosim. 27:2002;251-254
9. Daneshgari F., Taylor G.D., Miller G.J., et al. Computer simulation of the probability of detecting low volume carcinoma of the prostate with six random systematic core biopsies. Urology. 45:1995;604-609
10. Loughlin M., Carlbom I., Busch C. Three-dimensional modeling of biopsy protocols for localized prostate cancer. Comput Med Imaging Graph. 22:1998;229-238
11. Bauer J.J., Zeng J., Weir J., et al. Three-dimensional computer simulated prostate models Lateral prostate biopsies increase the detection rate of prostate cancer. Urology. 53:1999;961-967
12. Chen M.E., Troncoso P., Johnston D.A., et al. Optimization of prostate biopsy strategy using computer based analysis. J Urol. 158:1997;2168-2175
13. Ruijter E.T., Werahera P.N., van de Kaa C.A., et al. Detection of abnormal E-cadherin expression by simulated prostate biopsy. J Urol. 160:1998;1368-1372
14. Crawford E.D., Hirano D., Werahera P.N., et al. Computer modeling of prostate biopsy Tumor size and location - not clinical significance - determine cancer detection. J Urol. 159:1998;1260-1264
15. Kawata N., Miller G.J., Crawford E.D., et al. Laterally-directed biopsies detect more clinically threatening prostate cancer Computer simulated results. Prostate. 57:2003;118-128
16. Werahera P.N., Miller G.J., Taylor G.D., et al. A 3D reconstruction algorithm for interpolation and extrapolation of planar cross sectional data. IEEE Trans Biomed Imaging. 14:1995;765-771
17. Hirano D., Werahera P.N., Crawford E.D., et al. Morphological analysis and classification of latent prostate cancer using a 3-dimensional computer algorithm Analysis of tumor volume, grade, tumor doubling time and life expectancy. J Urol. 159:1998;1265-1269
18. Werahera P.N., Taylor G.D., Brubaker T., et al. Trendler R.C. Image reconstruction of radical prostatectomy specimens using a three dimensional reconstruction algorithm. 1994;1595-1599 IEEE, Piscataway, NY. Proceedings of 1994 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference.
19. Brubaker T.A., Hounder R.J., Vander Harr T.H. Octree encoding for visualization of atmospheric conditions and processes. J Atmos Oceanic Technol. 8:1991;507-516
20. Waters D.J., Boswick D.G., Murphy G.P. Conference summary First International Workshop on Animal Models of Prostate Cancer. Prostate. 36:1998;47-48
21. Lucia M.S., Bostwick D.G., Bosland M., et al. Rodent models of prostate cancer. Prostate. 36:1998;49-55
22. Stearns M.E., Ware J.L., Agus D.B., et al. Human xenograft models of prostate cancer. Prostate. 36:1998;56-58
23. Green J.E., Greenberg N.M., Ashendel C.L., et al. Transgenic and reconstitution models of prostate cancer. Prostate. 36:1998;59-63
24. Waters D.J., Sakr W.A., Hayden D.W., et al. Spontaneous prostate carcinoma in dogs and nonhuman primates. Prostate. 36:1998;64-69
25. McNeal J.E. Origin and development of carcinoma of the prostate. Cancer. 23:1969;24-34
26. McNeal J.E. Cancer volume and site of origin of adenocarcinoma in the prostate relationship to local and distant spread. Hum Pathol. 23:1992;258-266
27. Bostwick D.G. Grading prostate cancer. Am J Clin Pathol. 102:(4 Suppl 1):1994;S38-S56
28. Miller G.J., Cygan J.M. Morphology of prostate cancer The effect of multifocality on histological grade, tumor volume and capsule penetration. J Urol. 152:1994;1709-1713
29. Stamey T.A., Freiha F.S., McNeal J.E., et al. Localized prostate cancer. Relationship of tumor volume to clinical significance for treatment of prostate cancer. Cancer. 71:1993;933-938
30. Epstein J.I., Walsh P.C., Carmichael M., et al. Pathologic and clinical findings to predict tumor extent of nonpalpable (stage T1c) prostate cancer. JAMA. 271:1994;368-374
31. Bangma C.H., Hengeveld E.J., Niemer A.Q., et al. Errors in transrectal ultrasonic planimetry of the prostate Computer simulation of volumetric errors applied to a screening population. Ultrasound Med Biol. 21:1995;1083-1084
32. Shinohara K., Wheeler T.M., Scardino P.T. The appearance of prostate cancer on transrectal ultrasonography Correlation of imaging and pathological examinations. J Urol. 142:1989;76-82
33. Norberg M., Holmberg L., Busch C., et al. Multiple transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsies for the detection of prostate cancer and determination of tumor volume, grade and seminal vesicle invasion. Eur Radiol. 6:1996;56-61
34. Chen M.E., Johnston D.A., Tang K., et al. Detailed mapping of prostate carcinoma foci. Cancer. 89:2000;1800-1809
35. Chen M.E., Tronsoco P., Tang K., et al. Comparison of prostate biopsy schemes by computer simulation. Urology. 53:1999;951-960