Female MSW Students’ Satisfaction with Practicum Supervision: The Effect of Supervisor Gender

Journal of Social Work Education

Volumn 32, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 415-419

  Vonk, M Elizabeth ^a   Zucrow, Ellen ^a   Thyer, Bruce A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 3142565059     PISSN: 10437797     EISSN: 21635811     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10437797.1996.10778471     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Friedlander, M.L., &Ward, L. G. (1984).Development and validation of the supervisory styles inventory.Journal ofCounseling Psychology, 31,541-557.
2. Hudson, W. W., Thyer, B. A., & Stocks, J. T. (1985). Assessing the importance of experimental outcomes. Journal of Social Service Review, 8, 87-98.
3. Leighton J. (1991). Gender stereotyping in supervisory styles. Psychoanalytic Review, 78,347-363.
4. Munson, C. E. (1993). Clinical social work supervision. Binghamton, NY: Haworth.
5. Nelson, M. L., & Holloway, E. L. (1990). Relation of gender to power and involvement in supervision.Journal of Counseling Psychology, 37,473-481.
6. Putney, M. W., Worthington, E. L., Jr., & McCullough, M. E. (1992). Effects of supervisor and supervisee theoretical orientation and supervisor-supervisee matching on interns' perceptions ofsuperAsionJoumalofCounseüngPsyàwlogy, 39,258-265.
7. Robyak J. E., Goodyear, R. K., & Prange, M. (1987). Effects of supervisors’ sex, focus, and experience on preferences for interpersonal power bases. Counselor Education and Supervision, 26, 299-309.
8. Robyak, J. E., Goodyear, R. K., Prange, M. E., & Donham, G. (1986). Effects of gender, supervision, and presenting problems on practicum students’ preference for interpersonal power bases.JoumalofCounselingPsychology, 33,159-163.
9. Thyer, B. A. (1987) Statistics and Research [Letter to the Editor]. Social Work, 32, 552.
10. Thyer, B. A., Sowers-Hoag, K., & Love, J. P., (1986). The influence of field instructor and student gender combinations on student perceptions of field instruction quality. Arete, 11(2), 25-30.
11. Thyer, B. A., Stocks, J. T., & Hudson, W. W. (1987). Report proportions of variance explained [Letter]. American Journal of Psychiatry, 144, 690.
12. Twohey, D., & Volker, J. (1993). Listening for the voices of care and justice in counselor supervision. Counselor Education and Supervision, 32,189-197.
13. Vonk, E. M., & Thyer, B. A. (in press). Evaluating the quality of supervision: A review of instruments for use in field instruction. The Clinical Supervisor.
14. Worthington, E. L. (1984). Empirical investigation of supervision of counselors as they gain experience. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 31,63-75.
15. Worthington, E. L., & Roehlke, H.J. (1979). Effective supervision as perceived by beginning coun-selors-in-training. Journal ofCounselingPsychology, 26,54-73.