Designing a framework for the evaluation of paediatric telepsychiatry: A participatory approach

Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare

Volumn 10, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 165-169

  Boydell, Katherine M ^a,b   Greenberg, Natasha ^a,b   Volpe, Tiziana ^a,b  

^a HOSPITAL FOR SICK CHILDREN   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CHILD; CHILD CARE; COMMUNITY CARE; CONSULTATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; ECOLOGY; HEALTH PROGRAM; HUMAN; MEDICAL ASSESSMENT; PEDIATRICS; PSYCHIATRY; SOCIAL ASPECT; TECHNIQUE; TELECOMMUNICATION; TELEPHONE;

CHILD; CHILD HEALTH SERVICES; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMANS; MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES; ONTARIO; PROGRAM EVALUATION; REMOTE CONSULTATION;

EID: 3142550831     PISSN: 1357633X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1258/135763304323070823     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. McDonald I, Hill S, Daly J, Crowe B. Evaluating Telemedicine in Victoria: A Generic Framework. Melbourne: Victoria Department of Human Services, 1998
2. Yellowlees P. Practical evaluation of telemedicine systems in the real world. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare 1998;4 (suppl. 1):56-7
3. Boydell KM, Volpe T, Brown N. An Evaluation Design for Paediatric Telepsychiatry. Toronto: Division of Child Psychiatry, University of Toronto, 2001
4. Gelber H, Alexander M. An evaluation of an Australian video-conferencing project for child and adolescent telepsychiatry. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare 1999;5 (suppl. 1):21-3
5. Simpson J, Doze S, Urness D, Hailey D, Jacobs P. Evaluation of a routine telepsychiatry service. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare 2001;7:90-8
6. Kopel H, Nunn K, Dossetor D. Evaluating satisfaction with a child and adolescent psychological telemedicine outreach service. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare 2001;7 (suppl. 2):35-40
7. Ermer DJ. Experience with a rural telepsychiatry clinic for children and adolescents. Psychiatric Services 1999;50:260-1
8. Dossetor DR, Nunn KP, Fairley M, Eggleton D. A child and adolescent psychiatric outreach service for rural New South Wales: a telemedicine pilot study. Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health 1999;35:525-9
9. Farrell SP, McKinnon CR. Technology and rural mental health. Archives of Psychiatric Nursing 2003;17:20-6
10. Milstein RL, Wetterhall SF. Framework for Program Evaluation in Public Health. Washington, DC: Centre for Disease Control, Government Printing Office, 1999
11. Schorr L. Common Purpose: Strengthening Families and Neighborhoods to Rebuild America. New York: Anchor Books, Doubleday, 1997
12. Papineau D, Kiely MC. Participatory evaluation in a community organization: fostering stakeholder empowerment and utilization. Evaluation and Program Planning 1996;19:79-93
13. Mercier C. Participation in stakeholder-based evaluation: a case study. Evaluation and Program Planning 1997;20:467-75
14. Patton M. Utilization-Focused Evaluation: The New Century Text. 3rd edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1997
15. Diekelmann NL. Learning-as-testing: a Heideggerian hermeneutical analysis of the lived experiences of students and teachers in nursing. Advances in Nursing Science 1992;14:72-83
16. Creswell JW. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1998
17. Erlandson DA, Harris EL, Skipper BL, Allen SD. Doing Naturalistic Inquiry: A Guide to Methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1993
18. Lincoln YS, Guba EG. Naturalistic Inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1985
19. Brinkerhoff JM. Assessing and improving partnership relationships and outcomes: a proposed framework. Evaluation and Program Planning 2002;25:215-31
20. Mathie A, Greene JC. Stakeholder participation in evaluation: how important is diversity? Evaluation and Program Planning 1997;20:279-85
21. Cracknell BE. Knowing is all: or is it? Some reflections on why the acquisition of knowledge, focusing particularly on evaluation activities, does not always lead to action. Public Administration and Development 2001;21:371-9