Evolution of wave-packet spread under sequential scattering of particles of unequal mass

Physical Review Letters

Volumn 92, Issue 21, 2004, Pages

  Schulman, L S ^a  

^a CLARKSON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHARGED PARTICLES; CONVERGENCE OF NUMERICAL METHODS; ELECTROMAGNETIC WAVE INTERFERENCE; ELECTROMAGNETIC WAVE SCATTERING; FUNCTIONS; MATHEMATICAL TRANSFORMATIONS; MATRIX ALGEBRA; RESONANCE; STATISTICAL METHODS;

GAUSSIAN WAVE PACKETS; SEQUENTIAL SCATTERING; WAVE FUNCTIONS; WAVE-PACKET SPREADS;

HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS;

EID: 3142547282     PISSN: 00319007     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.210404     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. W. H. Zurek, S. Habib, and J. P. Paz, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 1187 (1993).
2. M. Tegmark, Foundations of Physics Letters 6, 571 (1993).
3. M. Tegmark and H. S. Shapiro, Phys. Rev. E 50, 2538 (1994).
4. D. Giulini, E. Joos, C. Kiefer, J. Kupsch, I.-O. Stamatescu, and H. D. Zeh, Decoherence and the Appearance of a Classical World in Quantum Theory (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1996).
5. L. S. Schulman, Phys. Rev. A 57, 840 (1998).
6. In 1D, with hard cores, No. 1 can bounce only between neighbors, so correlations can survive. In 3D or ID with possible transmission, this is not a problem. In using Eqs. (3) and (8), it would be more realistic to have collections of unequal-mass particles, each with a range of spreads, and to randomly pair them for scattering. I have done this numerically. Under the iterations (3) and (8), one gets the same result as for repeated iteration of a single pair.
7. Convergence of spread to the nonentangling values holds even if one takes the new spread from diag(ρ) in momentum space.
8. E. Merzbacher, Quantum Mechanics (Wiley, New York, 1970), 2nd ed.
9. W. H. Zurek, Phys. Today 44, No. 10, 36 (1991).
10. L. S. Schulman, in Path Integrals from meV to MeV, edited by M. Gutzwiller, A. Inomata, J. R. Klauder, and L. Streit (World Scientific, Singapore, 1986).
11. When Eq. (8) is iterated for fixed R, convergence fails along one axis.
12. 2. The fact that this gives nonentanglement if used in the successive scattering iteration is not surprising, since the fixed point involves the vanishing of the entangled portion, and the only question is convergence.
13. E. Feenberg, Ph.D. thesis, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1933, quoted in [14], p. 71.
14. E. C. Kemble, The Fundamental Principles of Quantum Mechanics with Elementary Applications (Dover, New York, 1958), 2nd ed.
15. Y. Aharonov, J. S. Anandan, and L. Vaidman, Phys. Rev. A 47, 4616 (1993).
16. G. M. D'Ariano, C. Macchiavello, and M. G. A. Paris, Phys. Rev. A 50, 4298 (1994).
17. T. J. Dunn, I. A. Walmsley, and S. Mukamel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 884 (1995).
18. W. Gale, E. Guth, and G. T. Trammell, Phys. Rev. 165, 1434 (1968).
19. C. Kurtsiefer, T. Pfau, and J. Mlynek, Nature (London) 386, 150 (1997).
20. D. Leibfried, D. M. Meekhof, B. E. King, C. Monroe, W. M. Itano, and D. J. Wineland, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 4281 (1996).
21. U. Leonhardt, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 4101 (1995).
22. C. Miquel, J. P. Paz, M. Saraceno, E. Knill, R. Laflamme, and C. Negrevergne, Nature (London) 418, 59 (2002).
23. A. Royer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 55, 2745 (1985).
24. D.T. Smithey, M. Beck, M. G. Raymer, and A. Faridani, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 1244 (1993).
25. M. Tegmark, Phys. Rev. A 54, 2703 (1996).
26. K. Vogel and H. Risken, Phys. Rev. A 40, 2847 (1989).
27. O. Carnal and J. Mlynek, Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 2689 (1991).
28. D.W. Keith, C. R. Ekstrom, Q. A. Turchette, and D. E. Pritchard, Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 2693 (1991).
29. H. Rauch, Phys. Scr. T76, 24 (1998).
30. To show the absence of interference with small transverse spread, the packet's transverse momentum must also be sufficiently constrained for the packet to land on one slit but have near-zero amplitude on the other. Note also that having the transverse spread sufficiently large is a necessary condition for interference, not sufficient.
31. 1. When time scales are comparable, this process can still take place, but a demonstration would require consideration of both kinds of evolution at the same time.
32. For large mass ratios many scatterings are required.
33. L. S. Schulman, Phys. Lett. A 211, 75 (1996).
34. L. S. Schulman, Time's Arrows and Quantum Measurement (Cambridge University Press, New York, 1997).