Electrocardiographic poor R-wave progression: Analysis of multiple criteria reveals little usefulness

American Heart Journal

Volumn 148, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 80-85

  Gami, Apoor S ^a   Holly, Thomas A ^b,c   Rosenthal, James E ^b,c,d  

^a MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

^b NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^d Chicago VA Hlthcare System Lakeside   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

RADIOISOTOPE;

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; EXERCISE TEST; FEMALE; HEART BUNDLE BRANCH BLOCK; HEART INFARCTION; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE HYPERTROPHY; HEART MUSCLE ISCHEMIA; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDLINE; PATIENT SELECTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; Q WAVE; R WAVE; SINGLE PHOTON EMISSION COMPUTER TOMOGRAPHY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

AGED; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; TOMOGRAPHY, EMISSION-COMPUTED, SINGLE-PHOTON;

EID: 3142544682     PISSN: 00028703     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2004.02.005     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Zema M.J., Kligfield P. Electrocardiographic poor r wave progression I correlation with the frank vectorcardiogram. J Electrocardiol. 12:1979;3-10
2. DePace N.L., Colby J., Hakki A.H., et al. Poor r wave progression in the precordial leads clinical implications for the diagnosis of myocardial infarction. JACC. 2:1983;1073-1079
3. Chung E.J. Electrocardiography. 1974;Harper & Row, Hagerstown (Md)
4. Physician's guide to Marquette Electronics Resting ECG Analysis. 1991;Marquette Electronics, Milwaukee (Wis)
5. Zema M.J., Luminais S.K., Chiaramida S., et al. Electrocardiographic poor r wave progression III the normal variant. J Electrocardiol. 13:1980;135-142
6. Zema M.J., Kligfield P. Electrocardiographic poor r wave progression II correlation with angiography. J Electrocardiol. 12:1979;11-15
7. Zema M.J., Collins M., Alonso D.R., et al. Electrocardiographic poor r-wave progression correlation with postmortem findings. Chest. 79:1981;195-200
8. Zema M.J., Collins M., Alonso D., et al. Electrocardiographic poor r wave progression correlation with autopsy findings. Chest. 79:1980;1953-1959
9. Warner R.A., Reger M., Hill N.E., et al. Electrocardiographic criteria for the diagnosis of anterior myocardial infarction importance of the duration of precordial r waves. Am J Cardiol. 52:1983;690-692
10. Horan L.G., Flowers N.C. Electrocardiography and vectorcardiography. Braunwald E. Heart disease. 1980;82-127 WB Saunders, Philadelphia
11. Wagner A., Mahrholdt H., Holly T.A., et al. Contrast-enhanced MRI detects subendocardial myocardial infarcts that are missed by rou-tine SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging. Lancet. 361:2003;374-379
12. Bodenheimer M.M., Banka V.S., Helfant R.H. Q waves and ventricular asynergy predictive value and hemodynamic significance of antomic localization. Am J Cardiol. 35:1975;615-618
13. Murata K., Matsushita S., Kurihara H., et al. Some pitfalls of vectorcardiographic diagnosis of myocardial infarction with particular respect to emphysema. Circulation. 35:1967;172-177
14. Uthorralt N., Parodi O., Severi S., et al. Thallium-201 scintigraphy for diagnosis of old myocardial infarction comparison with electrocardiographic, ventriculographic and coronary arteriographic findings. Br Heart J. 43:1980;527-534
15. DePuey E.G., Rozanski A. Using gated technetium-99m-sestamibi SPECT to characterize fixed myocardial defects as infarct or artifact. J Nucl Med. 36:1995;952-955