Problems of Library and Information Science Research in Turkey: A Content Analysis of Journal Articles 1952-1994

IFLA Journal

Volumn 26, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 39-46

  Yontar, Aysel ^a   Yalvaç, Mesut ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 3142514725     PISSN: 03400352     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/034003520002600107     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Peritz, B.C. “The Methods of Library Science Research: Some Results from a Bibliometric Survey”. Library Research 2: 251-268 (1981).
2. Nour, M.M. “A Quantitative Analysis of the Research Articles Published in Core Library Journals of 1980”. Library and Information Science Research 7: 261-273 (1985).
3. Feehan, P.E., W. L. Gragg, M.M. Havener, and D.D. Kester. “Library and Information Science Research: An Analysis of the 1984 Journal Literature”. Library and Information Science Research 9: 173-185 (1987).
4. Atkins, S.E. “Subject Trends in Library and Information Science Research, 1975-1984”. Library Trends 36: 633-658 (1988).
5. Järvelin, K. and P. Vakkari. “Content Analysis of Research Articles in Library and Information Science”. Library and Information Science Research 12: 395-421 (1990).
6. Järvelin, K. and P. Vakkari. “The Evolution of Library and Information Science 1965-1985: A Content Analysis of Journal Articles”. Information Processing and Management 29 (1): 129-144 (1993).
7. Altinörs, G. “Türkiye'de kütüphanecilik bilim dali konusunda yapilmis olan docentlik, doktora ve bilim uzmanligi tezlerinde kullanilmis olan arastirma metodlari”. (Research methods used in the associate professorship, doctoral and masters theses made in the field of library science in Turkey) Unpublished master's thesis. Hacettepe University, Ankara, 1983.
8. Yontar, A. “Main Research Trends Being Investigated in Turkey as Revealed in Graduate Theses”. Booklet 7, Division Education and Research, 61st IFLA General Conference, Istanbul, Turkey, 20-26 August 1995.
9. Kurbanoglu, S. S. “Kütüphanecilik ve bilgi bilim tezlerinde kullanilan bilimsel arastirma yontemleri: Bir degerlendirme”. (Research methods used in library and information science theses: An evaluation). Türk Kütüphaneciligi 10 (4): 350-359 (1996).
10. Cakin, Y. “Türk Kütüphaneciler Dernegi Bülteni'nin icerik ve yazar yününden degerlendirilmesi”. (Content analysis of the Turkish Librarians' Association Bulletin by authorship and by other characteristics). Unpublished master's thesis. Hacettepe University, Ankara, 1980.
11. Jäarvelin and Vakkari (1993), “Türk Kütüphaneciler Dernegi Bülteni' nin icerik ve yazar yününden degerlendirilmesi”.
12. Yontar, Türk Kütüphaneciler Dernegi Bülteni' nin icerik ve yazar yününden degerlendirilmesi.
13. Järvelin and Vakkari (1990), Türk Kütüphaneciler Dernegi Bülteni' nin icerik ve yazar yününden degerlendirilmesi.
14. Järvelin and Vakkari (1993), Türk Kütüphaneciler Dernegi Bülteni' nin icerik ve yazar yününden degerlendirilmesi.
15. Kumpulainen, S. “Library and Information Science Research in 1975: Content Analysis of Journal Articles”. Libri 41 (1): 59-76 (1991).
16. Huanwen, C. “A Bibliometric Study of Library and Information Research in China”. Division Education and Research, 62nd IFLA General Conference, Beijing, China, 25-31 August 1996.
17. Yontar, “A Bibliometric Study of Library and Information Research in China”.