Dental esthetic self-perception in young adults with and without previous orthodontic treatment

Angle Orthodontist

Volumn 76, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 412-416

  Bernabé, Eduardo ^a   Kresevic, Valeria D ^b   Cabrejos, Sandra C ^a   Flores Mir, Fernando ^a   Flores Mir, Carlos ^c,d  

^a UNIVERSIDAD PERUANA CAYETANO HEREDIA   (Peru)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

^d UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Dental appearance; Esthetic self perception; Orthodontic treatment need; Young adults

Indexed keywords

EID: 31344482435     PISSN: 00033219     EISSN: 00033219     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Brook PH, Shaw WC. The development of an index of orthodontic treatment priority. Eur J Orthod. 1989;11:309-320.
2. Grzywacz I. The value of the aesthetic component of the Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need in the assessment of subjective orthodontic treatment need. Eur J Orthod. 2003;25:57-63.
3. Mugonzibwa EA, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM, Van't Hof MA, Kikwilu EN. Perceptions of dental attractiveness and orthodontic treatment need among Tanzanian children. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2004;125:426-433.
4. Mandall NA, Wright J, Conboy FM, O'Brien KD. The relationship between normative orthodontic treatment need and measures of consumer perception. Community Dent Health. 2001;18:3-6.
5. Jarvinen S. Indexes for orthodontic treatment need. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2001;120:237-239.
6. de Oliveira CM, Sheiham A. The relationship between normative orthodontic treatment need and oral health-related quality of life. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2003;31:426-436.
7. Hamdan AM. The relationship between patient, parent and clinician perceived need and normative orthodontic treatment need. Eur J Orthod. 2004;26:265-271.
8. Gosney MB. An investigation into some of the factors influencing the desire for orthodontic treatment. Br J Orthod. 1986;13:87-94.
9. Espeland LV, Stenvik A. Perception of personal dental appearance in young adults: relationship between occlusion, awareness, and satisfaction. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1991;100:234-241.
10. Espeland LV, Stenvik A, Medin L. Concern for dental appearance among young adults in a region with non-specialist orthodontic treatment. Eur J Orthod. 1993;15:17-25.
11. Pietila T, Pietila I. Dental appearance and orthodontic services assessed by 15-16-year-old adolescents in eastern Finland. Community Dent Health. 1996;13:139-144.
12. Jenny J, Cons NC. Comparing and contrasting two orthodontic indices, the Index of Orthodontic Treatment need and the Dental Aesthetic Index. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1996;110:410-416.
13. Daniels C, Richmond S. The development of the index of complexity, outcome and need (ICON). J Orthod. 2000;27:149-162.
14. Evans R, Shaw W. Preliminary evaluation of an illustrated scale for rating dental attractiveness. Eur J Orthod. 1987;9:314-318.
15. Mandall NA, McCord JF, Blinkhorn AS, Worthington HV, O'Brien KD. Perceived aesthetic impact of malocclusion and oral self-perceptions in 14-15-year-old Asian and Caucasian children in greater Manchester. Eur J Orthod. 2000;22:175-183.
16. Howells DJ, Shaw WC. The validity and reliability of ratings of dental and facial attractiveness for epidemiologic use. Am J Orthod. 1985;88:402-408.
17. Flores-Mir C, Major PW, Salazar FR. Self-perceived orthodontic treatment need evaluated through 3 scales in a university population. J Orthod. 2004;31:329-334; discussion 302.
18. Burgersdijk R, Truin GJ, Frankenmolen F, Kalsbeek H, van't Hof M, Mulder J. Malocclusion and orthodontic treatment need of 15-74-year-old Dutch adults. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1991;19:64-67.
19. Tuominen ML, Tuominen RJ, Nystrom ME. Subjective orthodontic treatment need and perceived dental appearance among young Finnish adults with and without previous orthodontic treatment. Community Dent Health. 1994;11:29-33.
20. Tuominen ML, Tuominen RJ. Factors associated with subjective need for orthodontic treatment among Finnish university applicants. Acta Odontol Scand. 1994;52:106-110.
21. Lagerström L, Stenvik A, Espeland L, Hallgren H. Outcome of a scheme for orthodontic care: a comparison of untreated and treated 19-year-olds. Swed Dent J. 2000;24:49-51.
22. Lilja-Karlander E, Kurol J, Josefsson E. Attitudes and satisfaction with dental appearance in young adults with and without malocclusion. Swed Dent J. 2003;27:143-150.
23. Kerosuo H, Kerosuo E, Niemi M, Simola H. The need for treatment and satisfaction with dental appearance among young Finnish adults with and without a history of orthodontic treatment. J Orofac Orthop. 2000;61:330-340.
24. Stenvik A, Espeland L, Linge BO, Linge L. Lay attitudes to dental appearance and need for orthodontic treatment. Eur J Orthod. 1997;19:271-277.
25. Helm S, Petersen PE, Kreiborg S, Solow B. Effect of separate malocclusion traits on concern for dental appearance. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1986;14:217-220.
26. Gherunpong S, Tsakos G, Sheiham A. Developing and evaluating an oral health-related quality of life index for children; the CHILD-OIDP. Community Dent Health. 2004;21:161-169.
27. Gil J, García E, Rodríguez G. Discriminant Analysis.Madrid, Spain: La Muralla-Hespérides; 2001:25-26.
28. Espeland LV, Stenvik A. Orthodontically treated young adults: awareness of their own dental arrangement. Eur J Orthod. 1991;13:7-14.
29. Polit D, Hungler B. Scientific Research in Health Sciences. México DF, Mexico: McGraw-Hill Interamericana; 1997:284.
30. Burden DJ. The ranking of dental aesthetics. Br J Orthod. 1995;22:259-261.